Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> welding helmut, any difference between these 2 ??
jimkelly
post Aug 9 2013, 01:01 PM
Post #21


Delaware USA
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,969
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Delaware, USA
Member No.: 2,460
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



this is not a standing ovation for speedglas - dang.

jim

--

QUOTE(tomeric914 @ Aug 9 2013, 10:58 AM) *

Speedglas SUCKS. I got retina burn from using their helmets and returned the overprice POS.

I've used a Jackson EQC for the past 13 years and it has been 100% reliable. Try before you buy if possible. Each AD helmet is just a little different. Some have no adjustment, some have shade adjustment, some have sensitivity adjustment. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tomeric914
post Aug 9 2013, 01:43 PM
Post #22


One Lap of America in a 914!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,259
Joined: 25-May 08
From: Syracuse, NY
Member No.: 9,101
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(jimkelly @ Aug 9 2013, 03:01 PM) *

this is not a standing ovation for speedglas - dang.

Sorry Jim. I've been welding for 30+ years and have always been very careful when it come to weld safety. I got burned (literally) by two separate brand new Spedglas helmets. F them, never again. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/finger.gif)

Others may have had good luck with them, YMMV.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Aug 9 2013, 02:55 PM
Post #23


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,669
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(jimkelly @ Aug 9 2013, 05:57 AM) *
welding Helmut

I had no idea you could weld humans ...

https://www.google.com/#bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&a...p;q=Helmut+Kohl

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimkelly
post Aug 9 2013, 03:01 PM
Post #24


Delaware USA
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,969
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Delaware, USA
Member No.: 2,460
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



5 years worth of dust about to get wiped away

I ordered speedglas a minute before tomeric's post - crossing my fingers now.
$154 - $40 rebate = $114 : )

can't wait to get started TACKING AND MIGGING

preferably not on people - especially myself

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porcharu
post Aug 9 2013, 03:12 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,314
Joined: 27-January 05
From: Campbell, CA
Member No.: 3,518
Region Association: Northern California



If it's anything like my Speedglas you will love it. I could ride my bike with this helmet on (and gas weld as well) I love the thing. It was not cheap by any means but it has a HUGE 'screen' (like 2x of most) and goes really dark for high power welding and light enough to do low amp TIG or gas welding. Even has a setting for grinding but now way in hell am I grinding in a high end welding helmet. Great headgear as well, I can see how someone could wear this thing all day - thankfully I have an easy deskjob and don't have to do any 'real' work anymore.
My old $100 or so helmet I got while buying my MIG died a few years ago and when i upgraded I realized the old one sucked and would be illegal to sell now as the response time was over the limit - no wonder I felt like I had sand in my eyes after a long welding session. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)

QUOTE(jimkelly @ Aug 9 2013, 02:01 PM) *

5 years worth of dust about to get wiped away

I order speedglas a minute before tomeric's post - crossing my fingers now.

can't wait to get started TACKING AND MIGGING

preferably not on people - especially myself

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
scotty b
post Aug 9 2013, 03:15 PM
Post #26


rust free you say ?
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 16,375
Joined: 7-January 05
From: richmond, Va.
Member No.: 3,419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(tomeric914 @ Aug 9 2013, 11:43 AM) *

QUOTE(jimkelly @ Aug 9 2013, 03:01 PM) *

this is not a standing ovation for speedglas - dang.

Sorry Jim. I've been welding for 30+ years and have always been very careful when it come to weld safety. I got burned (literally) by two separate brand new Spedglas helmets. F them, never again. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/finger.gif)

Others may have had good luck with them, YMMV.


No offense, but I seriously doubt the helmet was the issue. I've been using a Speedglas for about 10 years now with no issues. Most of the professional welders I know either have a Speedglas, Miller, or Optrel. I have never heard of any issues with any of the 3.

What was behind you when you got " screwed " by the speedglas helmets? I have had retina burn bad and it had nothing to do with the cheapo helmet I was using. It had to do with the arc flash bouncing off a yellow car that was about 2 feet behind me for 3 hours.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Aug 9 2013, 05:55 PM
Post #27


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,457
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Dr Evil @ Aug 9 2013, 11:45 AM) *

I have the HF one and it works OK, but the head strap is shit. The connection to the mask broke soon after I bought it, and the mask will not stay in place. I am going to invest in a better helmet. I have gotten flashed before using the HF helmet and yes, it sucks. Maybe my welds will pretty up if I get a better helmet. I used whatever Zach had at his garage and it was fine. No idea what brand. The one you post looks like a good deal. Thanks!

Cheap harbor freight crap.
I've been intending to upgrading for a year, but have done no welding so I haven't.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tomeric914
post Aug 9 2013, 06:33 PM
Post #28


One Lap of America in a 914!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,259
Joined: 25-May 08
From: Syracuse, NY
Member No.: 9,101
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(scotty b @ Aug 9 2013, 05:15 PM) *

What was behind you when you got " screwed " by the speedglas helmets? I have had retina burn bad and it had nothing to do with the cheapo helmet I was using. It had to do with the arc flash bouncing off a yellow car that was about 2 feet behind me for 3 hours.

Interesting. It didn't matter where I was. On the ground, over the bench, direct sunlight, neither Speedglas worked worth a damn. Have they improved since then? Maybe, but maybe not. It's burned into my memory and I won't use them.

The issue was that Speedglas wouldn't switch from light to dark fast enough. Every time an arc was started there was a split second of blindness. It didn't matter how the lens would set, it was not fast enough. Multiple spot welds while hanging a panel and you're blind real quick.

Jim, you'll probably be fine, but you'll know for certain if it isn't working right. See what the return policy is just in case.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Aug 9 2013, 06:50 PM
Post #29


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



I've been using a HF helmet for years upon years.

I've had a Prostar helmet, but it wasnt as good as my HF one for viewing area and speed. Strap was better, but still I like the HF one. I'd get one for a backup any day.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimkelly
post Aug 9 2013, 07:07 PM
Post #30


Delaware USA
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,969
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Delaware, USA
Member No.: 2,460
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



the consensus is clear.

HF helmet is clearly sufficient, even good, especially for the price.

but it seems several brand name helmets are likely better overall.

well, I popped for $114 vs $40, and it sounds like i'll be fine.

thanks all!

first order of business is to lengthen a engine bay side shift rod by 1.5" without using JBWELD (IMG:style_emoticons/default/tooth.gif)

jim
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Aug 9 2013, 07:17 PM
Post #31


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



I have a Lincoln.

I like it.


KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bulitt
post Aug 9 2013, 07:49 PM
Post #32


Achtzylinder
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,188
Joined: 2-October 11
Member No.: 13,632
Region Association: South East States



I believe all helmets sold in the US have to meet minimum ANSI safety standards.
However as mentioned, some have cheap straps, small viewing areas, and different sensitivity controls. I had a N tool and the strap and helmet were very thin floppy plastic. Replaced it with a Miller Classic. Much larger viewing, multiple sensitivity settings, nice straps, and takes two AAA batteries. Nothing worse than welding and the button battery goes out. Cant go wrong with a Speedglas, Miller, Lincoln.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Aug 9 2013, 11:12 PM
Post #33


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,002
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Might be picking up an unused Miller Elite tomorrow (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Discount!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Aug 10 2013, 10:54 AM
Post #34


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,825
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



I welded for over 13 years (got me through college) and have never ONCE tried the auto-darkening lenses.
Being an EE, I just dont trust the electronics with my eye-sight.

Plain old large-glass Miller.
I even learned to put electrical tape around the perimeter of the lens and the splash covers.
I prefer the gold coated plastic lenses over the old-school glass, but they are very delicate.

I use a cover on the outside and the inside to protect the lens coating from scratches.
Put the three together and put e-tape around all three, then put the whole assembly in the lens holder that goes into the hood.
I found that if i didnt use the tape, sometimes light would get around the edges by refraction if you welded in strange viewing angles.

And I actually prefer the kind that goes on over a hardhat.
That way the head strap is only as good as your hat.

And I have been flash burned enough times to know how bad it sucks.

If you get flashed, put raw potato slices over your eyes.
That is almost as good as the drops they give you in the ER.

Stu
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimkelly
post Aug 13 2013, 12:28 PM
Post #35


Delaware USA
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,969
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Delaware, USA
Member No.: 2,460
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



because I got the speedglas so cheap ($114), I decided to get a harbor freight unit too ($39 with coupon), as a backup and to have one for a second person situation.

the speedglas unit is the one on the ... left I think : )


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bartlett 914
post Aug 13 2013, 12:47 PM
Post #36


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,216
Joined: 30-August 05
From: South Elgin IL
Member No.: 4,707
Region Association: Upper MidWest



My Optrel died. It was pretty expensive when I got it. It has internal batteries that are charged by the photocell. One shorted and the unit cannot be opened. OK it can but is now totally destroyed. I was at a supply house and asking about the differences. One point was the number of photo receivers. The number helps insure fast response. My unit had 2. Better ones have more. I also liked the removable plastic lens. It was replaceable when scratched. Mine also had a pocket for a magnifier. I cut up an old Optovisor and used that lens. I was able to see real nice.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimkelly
post Aug 13 2013, 01:03 PM
Post #37


Delaware USA
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,969
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Delaware, USA
Member No.: 2,460
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



two more pics - the speedglas has more controls.



Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bperry
post Aug 13 2013, 03:10 PM
Post #38


Lurker
**

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 16-February 04
From: Dallas, Tx
Member No.: 1,661



QUOTE(Bartlett 914 @ Aug 13 2013, 01:47 PM) *

One point was the number of photo receivers. The number helps insure fast response. My unit had 2. Better ones have more.

Not only that but having more sensors can help reduce the possibility
of being flashed when you are in odd positions, since it is less likely
that all the sensors are blocked by obstructions.

I have a Jackson NexGen EQC.
It is a great lens with a large viewing area with lots of features,
like a grind only mode,
but the battery covers are a poor design and it is easy to break them when
replacing the CR2450 coin batteries.
I like the helmut but I don't think I buy it again, there are others out there
for less money that have the same features without the battery cover issue.

My hot button features:
- switch time 1/20,000 or better
- shade control
- delay control
- sensitivity
- replaceable batteries that are easy to replace
- cheater (reading glass lens) compatible
- comfortable head gear.


Having used helmuts with large openings vs smaller ones, to me
the "extra large" viewing area is a bit over rated.
Particularly if you need to use corrective lenses.
I would spend more on other features like a faster switch time,
or a lower "light" state.
i.e. how light is the glass when not welding.
This varries a bit between different lenses.
The cheaper lenses are not as light when not welding.
That means you need more light to see prior to starting the arc.


--- bill
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 08:28 AM