Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> how many are using lightened flywheel and or stage 2 clutch kit, lightened flywheel
wes
post Sep 27 2013, 11:59 AM
Post #1


wes
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,588
Joined: 8-December 07
From: Ukiah Ca
Member No.: 8,436
Region Association: Northern California



I am thinking of using a lightened flywheel and wondering what others experience. I did a search and all seems to be older, Also the stage 2 clutch kit. I have a 2.0 built to 2.4 with about 150 hp and will be mostly street use,, but I like power. Thanks
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 14)
r3dplanet
post Sep 27 2013, 12:28 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 679
Joined: 3-September 05
From: Portland, Oregon
Member No.: 4,741
Region Association: None



I'm sure others will disagree, but I had a lightened flywheel in my 2002 Golf GTI that the clutch shop talked me into. I hated every last minute of it. The whole idea is apparently to keep the revs sustained during the brief moment of gear changes, which I'm sure is great on the track where the RPMs are always high. But on the street it was really irritating. I lived with it for about six months until I had the money to swap the flywheel out for a stock one. Much more drivable. I'm guessing this is why virtually every street car comes equipped with a "heavy" flywheel.

Don't flame me.

-marcus
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Woody
post Sep 27 2013, 12:54 PM
Post #3


Sandbox Rabblerouser and head toilet scrubber
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,858
Joined: 28-December 10
From: San Antonio Texas
Member No.: 12,530
Region Association: Southwest Region



I'm using a light flywheel on my 2056. Its been cut down to 11 pounds. Love it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wes
post Sep 27 2013, 01:16 PM
Post #4


wes
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,588
Joined: 8-December 07
From: Ukiah Ca
Member No.: 8,436
Region Association: Northern California



Has it affected you're shifting?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Sep 27 2013, 01:30 PM
Post #5


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,468
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



I put one on Sandy's car. I got it in a trade deal. I never weighed it. Hmmm.. should have. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) Anyway, the car will be on the road soon. I have a 2.0 with stock injection. We shall see if I like it.

The thought is it will free up some hp. and spin up faster out of the corners but may suck on the freeway when your trying to hold a steady speed. Also there is an issue with the engine stalling when your in town and let off the gas and let the idle drop while your foot is on the brake. Without the inertia of the heavier flywheel will sometimes the engine drops below idle and stalls.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
patrick3000
post Sep 27 2013, 01:32 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 192
Joined: 19-July 06
From: Maryland
Member No.: 6,468



QUOTE(r3dplanet @ Sep 27 2013, 02:28 PM) *

I'm sure others will disagree, but I had a lightened flywheel in my 2002 Golf GTI that the clutch shop talked me into. I hated every last minute of it. The whole idea is apparently to keep the revs sustained during the brief moment of gear changes, which I'm sure is great on the track where the RPMs are always high. But on the street it was really irritating. I lived with it for about six months until I had the money to swap the flywheel out for a stock one. Much more drivable. I'm guessing this is why virtually every street car comes equipped with a "heavy" flywheel.

Don't flame me.

-marcus


X2

Same deal with the 98 Boxster that I had, would fly up to 6K, always shifting. I hated it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ar15.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Sep 27 2013, 01:52 PM
Post #7


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,584
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(rick 918-S @ Sep 27 2013, 03:30 PM) *

I put one on Sandy's car. I got it in a trade deal. I never weighed it. Hmmm.. should have. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) Anyway, the car will be on the road soon. I have a 2.0 with stock injection. We shall see if I like it.

The thought is it will free up some hp. and spin up faster out of the corners but may suck on the freeway when your trying to hold a steady speed. Also there is an issue with the engine stalling when your in town and let off the gas and let the idle drop while your foot is on the brake. Without the inertia of the heavier flywheel will sometimes the engine drops below idle and stalls.

It affects idle, freeways speeds are not an issue...you are on the gas.
The idle may annoy you.

It can work if the car is in perfect tune.
I have run an 11 lb one for 10 years...
I know when I need a tuneup...it stalls at the lights.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bills914-4
post Sep 28 2013, 09:08 AM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 310
Joined: 1-March 08
From: suburbs of Miami FL.
Member No.: 8,762
Region Association: South East States



I run a 11lbs. flywheel , KEP 2 1/2 stage (custom order) & a Clutch Net disc (fiber carbon) in my 2.8 -4 , it's fun (mostly weekend driving) , I think a 13lbs. would be a little easier if it's going to be driven more often & especially if it's local city (traffic)
driving , just my $ .02 , Bill D.

(http://www.clutchnet.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=flypage.pbv.v2.tpl&product_id=36945&category_id=9789&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=140) ,

Here's my 11lbs. ,
Attached Image

Here's my 13lbs. for a future 2.4 ( 71c x 103 ) ,sorry about bright blur,
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Sep 28 2013, 09:28 AM
Post #9


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,345
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



My Audi motor has a lightened flywheel and a SPEC stage 3 clutch. In the donor vehicle is was almost un-driveable. Not enough rotating mass to get it moving without stalling. In my 914 it is awesome, works great. The difference is almost 2000lbs of vehicle mass.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Drums66
post Sep 28 2013, 12:17 PM
Post #10


914 Rudiments
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,321
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Coronado,Cali
Member No.: 151
Region Association: Southwest Region



....11lb, in a street car "hassle"till you get used to it? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) (not bad gitty-up)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Sep 28 2013, 02:28 PM
Post #11


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,598
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(r3dplanet @ Sep 27 2013, 10:28 AM) *

I'm sure others will disagree, but I had a lightened flywheel in my 2002 Golf GTI that the clutch shop talked me into. I hated every last minute of it. The whole idea is apparently to keep the revs sustained during the brief moment of gear changes, which I'm sure is great on the track where the RPMs are always high. But on the street it was really irritating. I lived with it for about six months until I had the money to swap the flywheel out for a stock one. Much more drivable. I'm guessing this is why virtually every street car comes equipped with a "heavy" flywheel.

Don't flame me.

-marcus


Spins the motor up faster. Some cars are already pretty light. 911 comes to mind...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pcar916
post Sep 28 2013, 04:54 PM
Post #12


Is that a Lola?
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,523
Joined: 2-June 05
From: Little Rock, AR
Member No.: 4,188
Region Association: None



You didn't actually ask a question...

Since 1999, my flywheel weighs 6.75 lbs on a 3.6L engine. The total flywheel/clutch/PP weight is less than 19lbs. Computer engine... no problems.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Sep 28 2013, 06:05 PM
Post #13


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,598
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



This may effect EFI with low frequency sampling. Engine spins up too fast. If as I suspect, you are talking about a factory EFI system, it samples enough to avoid the problem.

MS I and II are batch fired and might have a problem or perhaps could perform better if the weren't batch fired. MS III *can* fire individually and should be better and have better low mid response.

Idle to redline happens quicker with a lighter rotating mass. Not sure high rev shifting has anything at all to do with it because that same mass decells quicker as well...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Sep 28 2013, 09:45 PM
Post #14


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,468
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



QUOTE(r_towle @ Sep 27 2013, 02:52 PM) *

QUOTE(rick 918-S @ Sep 27 2013, 03:30 PM) *

I put one on Sandy's car. I got it in a trade deal. I never weighed it. Hmmm.. should have. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) Anyway, the car will be on the road soon. I have a 2.0 with stock injection. We shall see if I like it.

The thought is it will free up some hp. and spin up faster out of the corners but may suck on the freeway when your trying to hold a steady speed. Also there is an issue with the engine stalling when your in town and let off the gas and let the idle drop while your foot is on the brake. Without the inertia of the heavier flywheel will sometimes the engine drops below idle and stalls.

It affects idle, freeways speeds are not an issue...you are on the gas.
The idle may annoy you.

It can work if the car is in perfect tune.
I have run an 11 lb one for 10 years...
I know when I need a tuneup...it stalls at the lights.

Rich


On the freeway the heavy flywheel helps prevent the snap back to idle from compression. The heavy flywheel allows for a smoother driving experience without cruise control. If you let off the gas slightly the engine speed with decrease faster making for a choppy cruising speed. How much? Don't know. But I will soon enough.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Woody
post Sep 28 2013, 10:28 PM
Post #15


Sandbox Rabblerouser and head toilet scrubber
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,858
Joined: 28-December 10
From: San Antonio Texas
Member No.: 12,530
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(wes @ Sep 27 2013, 02:16 PM) *

Has it affected you're shifting?

Its not bad. Just shift faster.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th May 2024 - 04:38 PM