Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Track car alignment, Unsettled debate
stephenpowless
post Sep 27 2013, 08:42 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 27-September 13
From: Minneapolis
Member No.: 16,444
Region Association: None



I have a 74 914 tub converted to a track car. Sheridan body kit, 3.6 varioram motor, 915 tranny(which I hate and may convert to G50), 935 front suspension, 944 turbo brakes, bilstein coil overs. On flat straightaways, it's debating which tire to follow and darts left and right, as if there is a strong cross wind. Had it re-aligned as follows; scale, L/F 497. R/F 458, L/RR 638, R/RR 590. Camber : L/F 3.5. R/F 3.6. L/RR 1.8. R/RR 2.0. Toe: L/R front 0, L/RR 1.5. R/RR 1.5. It's still "debating" at speed, which is very unnerving going into turn one at BIR. The questions are; is the alignment the problem or do I need some downforce via a wing? Appreciate any insight. This is my first visit to this forum. Thanks in advance.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Matt Romanowski
post Sep 27 2013, 09:01 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 878
Joined: 4-January 04
From: Manchester, NH
Member No.: 1,507



That is a ton of camber in the front combined with no toe. I would say to try a little toe in to see if it settles down.

How are your tire temps after a session?

And what tires do you run?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Sep 27 2013, 10:21 PM
Post #3


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,616
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Sounds like a car that should be on slicks with zero camber.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
old dog
post Sep 27 2013, 10:23 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 63
Joined: 14-December 12
From: Oxnard,CA.
Member No.: 15,257
Region Association: Central California



Radial race tires do run an outrageous amount of camber, but a little bit of toe in should help. Castor angle is also a stabilizer in a straight line , I didn't notice that measurement ? Also, make sure it is toe in at the rear and we haven't mistakenly given her toe out in the rear ( which can also be very exciting ). If it is "nervous " in a straight line , something is wrong.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Sep 27 2013, 10:23 PM
Post #5


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,616
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



2178lbs?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stephenpowless
post Sep 27 2013, 10:33 PM
Post #6


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 27-September 13
From: Minneapolis
Member No.: 16,444
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Sep 27 2013, 08:23 PM) *

2178lbs?

2183 lbs. Hoosier 245/40ZR17 R6 front, 295/35ZR17 R6 rear
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Sep 28 2013, 07:33 AM
Post #7


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,616
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I run about a quarter degree less negative camber in the front than in the back. So up your rear number and straighten out your front. Hoosiers also.

I always set my rear suspension to a balanced number that is close to what I can max the worse side at. And then set my front ratio for a quarter less than I got on the rear.
So for example rear at -2.50. And front at -2.25

I think your front end is skating down the straight on a very small corner of contact patch.

We noticed significant brake capability loss when we went more than -2.75 or -3 degrees in the front. Even though th Hoosier would like the negative camber in the corners it didn't like the contact patch under breaking.

We settled on -2.25 ish for our front setting

What suspension bushings do you run in the rear? With a bushing that has no movement like a metal mono ball you can go to zero toe. Otherwise a 16th of toe in.

I think you probably should realign. I don't know how often you are realigning but it changes much more than you would expect and frequent re alignments are a necessity on a track 914.

Our car weights are different which also has an impact on the tires and their temps so you may have slightly different alignment needs too
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Sep 28 2013, 08:34 AM
Post #8


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,917
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Sep 28 2013, 08:33 AM) *

I run about a quarter degree less negative camber in the front than in the back. So up your rear number and straighten out your front. Hoosiers also.

I always set my rear suspension to a balanced number that is close to what I can max the worse side at. And then set my front ratio for a quarter less than I got on the rear.
So for example rear at -2.50. And front at -2.25

I think your front end is skating down the straight on a very small corner of contact patch.

We noticed significant brake capability loss when we went more than -2.75 or -3 degrees in the front. Even though th Hoosier would like the negative camber in the corners it didn't like the contact patch under breaking.

We settled on -2.25 ish for our front setting

What suspension bushings do you run in the rear? With a bushing that has no movement like a metal mono ball you can go to zero toe. Otherwise a 16th of toe in.

I think you probably should realign. I don't know how often you are realigning but it changes much more than you would expect and frequent re alignments are a necessity on a track 914.

Our car weights are different which also has an impact on the tires and their temps so you may have slightly different alignment needs too

I agree with Brant that you should be running less front camber.
You should also check bump steer on all 4 corners.
Depending on the how low the car is, the loaded rear tire could be toeing out quickly as you turn in, which means extra rear static toe-in is needed.

Without knowing the camber and toe curves of your suspension setup
raising the ride height may be the easiest way to improve handling.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Apr 22 2016, 04:22 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Sep 28 2013, 07:33 AM) *



We settled on -2.25 ish for our front setting




Brant,

I tried your suggestions on my front suspension to get more camber than stock.
I removed the kidney shaped "hats" and trimmed the inboard side off with a bandsaw to eliminate interference inside the shock tower.

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i366.photobucket.com-10819-1461363731.1.jpg)


I also enlarged the bolt holes in the in board direction.

Now I can get up to 2.0 degrees camber on that side before the "neck" of the shock top hits the side of the large opening.

So I am wondering if I can use the porting tool and remove the inboard lip of that hole to give me another .25 degrees.
Can I enlarge the big hole by ~0.25 in without ruining the rigidity?
I am sure the lip adds some stiffness in that area, but I dont think it will make much of a difference overall.

Here is where I would like to cut back about far enough to remove that lip entirely.
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i366.photobucket.com-10819-1461363732.2.jpg)

Thoughts?

I could buy the $350 offset billet tops but this costs essentially zero.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post Apr 25 2016, 07:21 AM
Post #10


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,917
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



QUOTE(stugray @ Apr 22 2016, 06:22 PM) *

Can I enlarge the big hole by ~0.25 in without ruining the rigidity?

You can grind that lip away. That's how I got the last bit of negative camber in my car when I ran it in ITB.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Apr 27 2016, 01:44 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



As mentioned by others, that's a lot of neg. camber in the front.

Definitely check your bump steer if you haven't, as Chris suggests above. Often overlooked. If it's not right, the car can wander all over the track. If your bump steer is bad enough, even small undulations like you see on a straight can make the car wander.

You'll hear different opinions on what toe to run. I run 1/16" toe out in front and 3/16" toe in at the rear. 914 rear arms are known to flex a lot, so I run more toe in at the back than you might with other cars. I am running wide Goodyear radial slicks, for what it's worth.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
6freak
post Apr 27 2016, 03:26 PM
Post #12


MR.C
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,740
Joined: 19-March 08
From: Tacoma WA
Member No.: 8,829
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



tighten front sway bar more weight on front wheels JMO
HAVE FUN
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th April 2024 - 05:39 PM