Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Mid Engine Transmissions, I been thinking
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 05:22 PM
Post #21


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE (Mueller @ Jan 21 2005, 09:53 AM)
MR2 is not mid-engine.......it's basicly a traditional* FWD platform moved to the near middle of the vehicle

*confused*

how does transverse mounting alter the location of the engine?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jan 21 2005, 05:25 PM
Post #22


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,571
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE (Mueller @ Jan 21 2005, 02:42 PM)
QUOTE
The 928 puts out 300+ in stock trim...and it wont stay stock...I have seen 600HP versions out there.


have you priced how expensive it is to hot rod the 928 engine? they are not cheap at all......you might end up being very happy with 300hp (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)

Supercharger!

Forced induction on the 5.0 liter would easily kill off a 901 tranny.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jan 21 2005, 05:27 PM
Post #23


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,571
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE (MattR @ Jan 21 2005, 03:22 PM)
QUOTE (Mueller @ Jan 21 2005, 09:53 AM)
MR2 is not mid-engine.......it's basicly a traditional* FWD platform moved to the near middle of the vehicle

*confused*

how does transverse mounting alter the location of the engine?

the mr2 is a traversed mounted engine.

Which BTW I think might be a valid swap in for a 914.

Its basically a FWD engine and tranny with the motor mounted sideways (crank is left to right, versus a Type 4 which thecrank is front to rear)
So the engine and tranny are both sideways, flywheel etc are all sideways..

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jan 21 2005, 05:29 PM
Post #24


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



the engine almost sits on top of the transmission, it it not what we consider mid-engine...

he wants to mate a V8 or similar engine to the transmission, not the easiest task with a transverse transmission as well


QUOTE
Supercharger!

Forced induction on the 5.0 liter would easily kill off a 901 tranny.

Rich
...go ahead...not too many 928s have had successful superchargers added without blowing the engine first (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Jan 21 2005, 05:33 PM
Post #25


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



B&B (a German company) made a 928 targa... was maybe '79...

Looked like a Super-Teener... and ended up with a six-pack of tiny turbos.

=o0


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 05:34 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



Isnt a mid engine car a car in which the engine sits in the middle (defined as being between the axles)?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jan 21 2005, 05:37 PM
Post #27


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE (MattR @ Jan 21 2005, 04:34 PM)
Isnt a mid engine car a car in which the engine sits in the middle (defined as being between the axles)?

look at the location of the axle...it's damn near under the engine (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)

(bottom left hand corner of pic)
(IMG:http://www.jhotexports.com/ebay/20041104/sw20_3sgte1_4.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jan 21 2005, 05:38 PM
Post #28


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



here is a better view of the transmission, it's the part in the lower left with the axles sticking out:

(IMG:http://www.jhotexports.com/ebay/20041104/sw20_3sgte1_6.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 05:39 PM
Post #29


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



Yes, I understand that, but why does that have to do with it being mid engine (versus front engine or rear engine). If its not a mid-engine car, what is it? The engine (cg) definatly doesnt sit in front of the front axles, or behind the rear axles.

By that logic a Ferrari 246 dino isnt mid engine??? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Jan 21 2005, 05:42 PM
Post #30


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



No, a Dino is a 'true' mid-engined car.

There is a big difference between sitting just in front of vs just over the axles.


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 05:44 PM
Post #31


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



The CG of the engine is in front of the axles though. Not as much as a 914, but when you open the lid of a MR2 (my buddy has a mk2), you're definatly look at an engine thats placed in front of the axles.

Would you consider the MR2 a rear engine (sorry for the typo) car? Even though the name means "Mid engine Rear 2 wheel drive"?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
eeyore
post Jan 21 2005, 05:45 PM
Post #32


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 889
Joined: 8-January 04
From: meridian, id
Member No.: 1,533
Region Association: None



I think the point of exclusion of the MR2 trans solution is that it is a transverse engine, with a transverse transmission. The V8s in question are intended for fore-aft installation, not side-side.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 05:49 PM
Post #33


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



I know its not a solution for the 914, Im just disputing the MR2 not being a mid engine car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Jan 21 2005, 05:50 PM
Post #34


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



QUOTE (MattR @ Jan 21 2005, 07:44 PM)
Would you consider the MR2 a rear wheel drive car?  Even though the name means "Mid engine Rear 2 wheel drive"?

You mean consider it a mid-engined car?

Never.

Lamborghini Muiras have transverse mounted 12s, and until the SA/SV, the transaxle and motor shared oil, and were one unit... not that it's important to this conversation, but that is the only super-duper transverse mounting I know of.... or can think of off the top of this thing I keep what's left of my brain in.

Oh, but the Muira is a mid-engined car... the package is well forward of the rear axles.

Look at the MR2 motor/trans package assembly... the CG is about 3 feet off the ground.. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wink.gif)


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 05:55 PM
Post #35


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



Im not disputing z axis CG. I know the car is crap (compared to our treasures (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif)). But check out this picture. I think it explains what Im talking about.

(IMG:http://www.enetconsulting.com/tropsmr2/p5130001.jpg)

Check out the position of the center of gravity (XY plane) in relation to the position of the struts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 05:56 PM
Post #36


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



Here's another image:

(IMG:http://www.spyderchat.com/spyderimages/mr-stech3.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Jan 21 2005, 05:58 PM
Post #37


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



Draw a line at the rear of the front tires, and another at the front of the rear tires..

That is what I am talking about.

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Jan 21 2005, 05:58 PM
Post #38


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



This really is just splitting hairs. I've always considered the MR2 to be mid-engined. The engine is behind the seats, but there's a trunk behind it, and you can't reach much of anything in the engine bay from above, only from below. Pretty much like a 914. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif)

By Mike's definition, using a Mini drivetrain would make it mid-engined. The entire Mini gearbox was directly under the crank. The clutch was on the end. But the diff hung out the back, so the complete engine/gearbox was entirely in front of the axles.

If the crank is forward of the diff, it's mid-engined. If the crank is aft of the diff, it's rear-engined. That's my definition...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Jan 21 2005, 06:03 PM
Post #39


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



After studying the pic a little longer... I came up with that same thought... but..

I think the class needs a little more clarification.. like Mid-1, Mid-2...

A true mid-engined car, by definition (I have read) has the passenger compartment, and the powertrain between the axle lines, front-and-rear.

Having a trunk sure makes it tough! I have obsessed enough!


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Jan 21 2005, 06:07 PM
Post #40


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE (redshift @ Jan 21 2005, 03:58 PM)
Draw a line at the rear of the front tires, and another at the front of the rear tires..

That is what I am talking about.

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)


M

Why do the tires define the location of the engine? Would putting smaller tires on the car change its engine location? It should be measured from the center of the tire, where the forces are applied.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th May 2024 - 04:42 AM