Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> turbine engine setup for 5k, is this for real
thelogo
post Oct 6 2014, 02:53 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 1,510
Joined: 6-April 10
Member No.: 11,572
Region Association: None



http://m.ebay.com/itm/301333942262


Somebody post the photo from this link if they know how

............


I always thought I would see someone's car with this setup here
Before I saw it anywhere else.



I know dodge experimented with this in the 60 s right

But how viable is this power plant

And how much would be involved in , money wise $$$

To do this installation.. I'm thinkin a lot.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Oct 6 2014, 03:02 PM
Post #2


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,651
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Sleepin
post Oct 6 2014, 03:19 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,647
Joined: 20-November 07
From: Grand Junction, Co.
Member No.: 8,357
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Limo powerplant.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fixer34
post Oct 6 2014, 03:41 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,085
Joined: 16-September 14
From: Chicago area
Member No.: 17,908
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I put this in the 'Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do it...' category.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Oct 6 2014, 04:03 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,559
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



QUOTE(fixer34 @ Oct 6 2014, 05:41 PM) *

I put this in the 'Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD do it...' category.


That tank looking thing will need to be upholstered.
It'll be next to your hip and under your elbow.
For 160 HP why bother ?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SLITS
post Oct 6 2014, 04:10 PM
Post #6


"This Utah shit is HARSH!"
**********

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 13,602
Joined: 22-February 04
From: SoCal Mountains ...
Member No.: 1,696
Region Association: None



STP Racing pulled it off at the Brickyard.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
busmech
post Oct 6 2014, 05:36 PM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 12-April 09
From: Daly City Ca
Member No.: 10,258
Region Association: Northern California



There is one problem, the exhaust is going forward as built.
http://www.jetpower.co.uk/gtp70_gallery.htm

I remember having a Car and Driver with a Vette powered by P&W PT6. Built by Granitelle. It idled at 60MPH and at the 1/4 mile left 2 black streeks for 1,200 feet. You can run them on about anything, but this one would not work for a 914 maybe a VW but you would burn the paint off the car behind you.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
veekry9
post Oct 6 2014, 06:28 PM
Post #8


OldMember
****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 3,068
Joined: 17-June 13
From: TO
Member No.: 16,025
Region Association: Canada




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2A5ijU3Ivs



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4itFz7EVGqA


http://www.granatellimotorsports.com/

http://jalopnik.com/5979348/forgotten-cars...urbine-cars-too

More research needed,lot of BS spouted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STP-Paxton_Turbocar

http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2014/06...ads-to-auction/

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elliot Cannon
post Oct 6 2014, 06:38 PM
Post #9


914 Guru
*****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 8,487
Joined: 29-December 06
From: Paso Robles Ca. (Central coast)
Member No.: 7,407
Region Association: None



Chrysler tried it back in the early sixties. They leased them to a few families around the country to try it out. There was one close to my house. And, of course, Leno has one. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FourBlades
post Oct 6 2014, 07:10 PM
Post #10


From Wreck to Rockin
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,054
Joined: 3-December 07
From: Brevard, FL
Member No.: 8,414
Region Association: South East States




Everyone knows you can't turbine a 914!

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

John
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Oct 6 2014, 07:15 PM
Post #11


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,345
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



I see my next donor motor... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)

I bet it's loud! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
veekry9
post Oct 6 2014, 08:35 PM
Post #12


OldMember
****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 3,068
Joined: 17-June 13
From: TO
Member No.: 16,025
Region Association: Canada



Attached Image
Roads?
Where we're going,we don't need Roads

Gas Turbine generator charges batteries runs electric motors.
Intrinsic losses mount.
Way Neato tho.
Anyone interested in an attempt to do better what Rover and Chrysler did?
Deep pocket develops hole.
New materials available today may make feasible a more efficient turbine and drive.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Oct 6 2014, 08:58 PM
Post #13


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



A lot easier to do in a front engine car...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIFaxA3dj3Y
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mapguy
post Oct 7 2014, 12:05 AM
Post #14


Freelance Generalist
**

Group: Members
Posts: 90
Joined: 31-January 14
From: Inland Empire, CA
Member No.: 16,945
Region Association: Southern California



One word: Sandrail. I bet you'd be the only guy at the dunes with one. At least until you sucked sand into the blades.

I wouldn't want to be around for that.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/blowup.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Oct 7 2014, 05:35 AM
Post #15


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



Two words: M1 Abram.

From Wikipedia: The M1 Abrams' powertrain comprises a 1,500 shaft horsepower (1,100 kW) Honeywell AGT 1500 (originally made by Lycoming) multi-fuel gas turbine, and a six speed (four forward, two reverse) Allison X-1100-3B Hydro-Kinetic automatic transmission, giving it a governed top speed of 45 mph (72 km/h) on paved roads, and 30 mph (48 km/h) cross-country. With the engine governor removed, speeds of around 60 mph (97 km/h) are possible on an improved surface; however, damage to the drivetrain (especially to the tracks) and an increased risk of injuries to the crew can occur at speeds above 45 mph (72 km/h). The tank was built around this engine[59] and it is multifuel capable; meaning that it can be powered with diesel, kerosene, any grade of motor gasoline, and jet fuel (such as JP-4 or JP-8). For logistical reasons, JP-8 is the US military's universal fuel powering both aircraft and vehicle fleets. On the other hand, Australian M1A1 AIM SA burn diesel fuel, since the use of JP-8 is less common in the Australian Army.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ripper911
post Oct 7 2014, 05:59 AM
Post #16


corde pulsum tangite
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,920
Joined: 25-April 10
From: Powder Springs, GA
Member No.: 11,654
Region Association: South East States



It should fit in a 914.

(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i921.photobucket.com-11654-1412683165.1.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Oct 7 2014, 06:08 AM
Post #17


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,559
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



QUOTE(maf914 @ Oct 7 2014, 07:35 AM) *

Two words: M1 Abram.

From Wikipedia: The M1 Abrams' powertrain comprises a 1,500 shaft horsepower (1,100 kW) Honeywell AGT 1500 (originally made by Lycoming) multi-fuel gas turbine, and a six speed (four forward, two reverse) Allison X-1100-3B Hydro-Kinetic automatic transmission, giving it a governed top speed of 45 mph (72 km/h) on paved roads, and 30 mph (48 km/h) cross-country. With the engine governor removed, speeds of around 60 mph (97 km/h) are possible on an improved surface; however, damage to the drivetrain (especially to the tracks) and an increased risk of injuries to the crew can occur at speeds above 45 mph (72 km/h). The tank was built around this engine[59] and it is multifuel capable; meaning that it can be powered with diesel, kerosene, any grade of motor gasoline, and jet fuel (such as JP-4 or JP-8). For logistical reasons, JP-8 is the US military's universal fuel powering both aircraft and vehicle fleets. On the other hand, Australian M1A1 AIM SA burn diesel fuel, since the use of JP-8 is less common in the Australian Army.


It will require a muffler the size of the car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
veekry9
post Oct 7 2014, 07:05 AM
Post #18


OldMember
****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 3,068
Joined: 17-June 13
From: TO
Member No.: 16,025
Region Association: Canada



Attached Image

http://www.avonaero.com/garrett70.htm
Two would fit nicely in a helicopter.

A miniature turbine EV has got to be more efficient than a piston engine EV.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbseto
post Oct 7 2014, 07:17 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,253
Joined: 6-August 14
From: Cincy
Member No.: 17,743
Region Association: North East States



...until you factor in maintenance costs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
CptTripps
post Oct 7 2014, 08:22 AM
Post #20


:: Punch and Pie ::
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,584
Joined: 26-December 04
From: Mentor, OH
Member No.: 3,342
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I'd go Electric before I'd go Turbine...

...and I'd likely blow a hobo in a truck-stop bathroom before either.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2024 - 10:28 PM