Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1980 24 Hours of Dayton GTU class winning 914-6, pics
flat6parts
post Dec 18 2014, 04:34 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 31-March 14
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 17,182
Region Association: Southern California



Hey all, though you might like some eye candy.
Today we had our friends 1980 IMSA 24 Hours of Daytona GTU class winning and 5th overall 914-6 at our shop (carrera6) in San Gabriel, CA
It is still in it's 1983 Sebring livery
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i1093.photobucket.com-17182-1418942051.1.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i1093.photobucket.com-17182-1418942051.2.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i1093.photobucket.com-17182-1418942051.3.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i1093.photobucket.com-17182-1418942052.4.jpg)
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i1093.photobucket.com-17182-1418942052.5.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
eric9144
post Dec 18 2014, 05:02 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,734
Joined: 30-March 11
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 12,876
Region Association: Southern California



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Dec 18 2014, 07:16 PM
Post #3


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,426
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



Cool but not as cool as being there like I was in 1980...

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post Dec 19 2014, 01:55 PM
Post #4


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Dec 19 2014, 01:58 PM
Post #5


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,620
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



did that car run as a 2.5 or 3.o by then?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Dec 19 2014, 04:04 PM
Post #6


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,426
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



GTU was under 2.5 at that time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Dec 19 2014, 04:34 PM
Post #7


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,620
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



What year did IMSA allow 914's to go 3.0?

I Actually have considered running a 2.5 IMSA classification
Was the white car at COTA ?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Dec 20 2014, 07:23 AM
Post #8


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,426
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Dec 19 2014, 03:34 PM) *

What year did IMSA allow 914's to go 3.0?



I don't remember that one but by the time the engine size was increased the RX7 and Toyotas were winning it all.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Jan 6 2015, 08:48 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



QUOTE(brant @ Dec 19 2014, 05:34 PM) *

What year did IMSA allow 914's to go 3.0?



It was 2.8L for a while, maybe from the late 70's or so, and then 3.0L starting in the mid to late 80's. 914's aged out and were no longer legal around the late 80's, so may never have run with the 3.0L in GTU.

Scott
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carr914
post Jan 7 2015, 06:00 AM
Post #10


Racer from Birth
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 118,448
Joined: 2-February 04
From: Tampa,FL
Member No.: 1,623
Region Association: South East States



If I remember correctly this car has a 2.8
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gms
post Jan 7 2015, 09:53 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,694
Joined: 12-March 04
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 1,785
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(flat6parts @ Dec 18 2014, 04:34 PM) *

It is still in it's 1983 Sebring livery

This is the 1983 Sebring Livery
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gms
post Jan 7 2015, 09:55 AM
Post #12


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,694
Joined: 12-March 04
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 1,785
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(carr914 @ Jan 7 2015, 06:00 AM) *

If I remember correctly this car has a 2.8

2.5L in the 1980 IMSA rule book
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carr914
post Jan 8 2015, 06:17 AM
Post #13


Racer from Birth
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 118,448
Joined: 2-February 04
From: Tampa,FL
Member No.: 1,623
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(gms @ Jan 7 2015, 10:55 AM) *

QUOTE(carr914 @ Jan 7 2015, 06:00 AM) *

If I remember correctly this car has a 2.8

2.5L in the 1980 IMSA rule book
Attached Image


Probably should have said it now has a 2.8
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Vysoc
post Jul 25 2015, 04:22 PM
Post #14


Vysoc
***

Group: Members
Posts: 586
Joined: 27-August 09
From: Young Harris, Georgia
Member No.: 10,737
Region Association: South East States



Great photo URY!......love the number and the color and the Ford Pick-Up in the backround, what year is the Econoline thingy?

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/flag.gif) Vysoc
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ndfrigi
post Jul 25 2015, 04:37 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,928
Joined: 21-August 11
From: Orange County
Member No.: 13,474
Region Association: Southern California



Hi Scott, is that the car inside your hanger in Long Beach seated on the upper level of the lift?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
naro914
post Jul 28 2015, 06:45 AM
Post #16


Losing my mind...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,476
Joined: 26-May 06
From: Charlotte, NC
Member No.: 6,073
Region Association: South East States



guys
where can I find the rule book that shows what was and what is currently legal?
Glen - where did you find that rule?
Scott - do you have something that somewhere shows that a 2.8 or 3.0 was legal?

I need to make some decisions on our engine and would like to make that based on what I may be able to run in vintage racing in the future. From what I've learned (and it always seems to be a moving target) that if it was IMSA legal at some point in the past, I can run. I'd just like to have the documentation to back it up...

At the Hawk, the head of tech gave me shit for months in advance for Papa Smurf - saying things like "take all that crap off the car" and "we don't allow shit like that" referring to the wing and splitter (which I agreed to take off), slicks, fiberglass body, etc...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stownsen914
post Jul 28 2015, 08:56 AM
Post #17


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 3-October 06
From: Ossining, NY
Member No.: 6,985
Region Association: None



Bob - I just googled for a while looking for "IMSA rulebook" and wasn't finding much at first, but finally noticed that the rulebook is actually called "IMSA Code" and then found a bunch of the early and mid 80s rulebook on this website http://www.mulsannescorner.com/. Scroll to the very bottom and look for "1981 IMSA GTP chassis rules". It looks like the IMSA code/rulebook for that year for all classes including GTU. I see links for the '86, '85, and '81 ones too. Quick summary of what I see:
- In 1981 the GTU limit was 2.5L
- By 1985 the GTU limit had jumped to 3.0L. I guess 2.8L was somewhere in between there.
- The 914/6 was listed as an eligible car in all 4 years. I know it became ineligible in the late 80s, but that must have been after 1987.

I've been looking for these too, so glad I finally found them!

I believe the vintage organizations like HSR and SVRA more or less align their rules with IMSA rules with classes for different periods, and some allowances to encourage participation. It sounds like you've seen those rules already, but they're worth checking as well to make sure your car lines up well with one of their classes.

Scott
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gms
post Jul 28 2015, 11:00 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,694
Joined: 12-March 04
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 1,785
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(naro914 @ Jul 28 2015, 07:45 AM) *

At the Hawk, the head of tech gave me shit for months in advance for Papa Smurf - saying things like "take all that crap off the car" and "we don't allow shit like that" referring to the wing and splitter (which I agreed to take off), slicks, fiberglass body, etc...

In 2011 I ran at the BRIC which was the predecessor to the Hawk. I was so insulted by Jack and his uneducated critique of my car that I have never been back to race.

I have an IMSA 914 that has the same panels, sticker and scars as when it was built and raced in the 1980s. The irony was that it was one of a few real professional race cars in attendanceā€¦as far as I can tell they are trying to make this a concours event.

Jack told me he wanted to create a "snap shoot in time" look during each race that is why my body work from the late '70s was not allowed. I looked at the entry list and there was a 1983 Porsche 944 in our run group...WTF!

I have attended the race for the past 12 years but last year topped them all when a 2010 Boss Mustang was entered in Group 8 and won against cars with engines half its size. It further ruined the race for me because Frank Beck (in a 914/6) usually wins.

As soon as I have finished with my 8 years of research about 914s in IMSA I will publish a book to correctly set allowable engines, wheels and body work for these stubborn tech guys.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
naro914
post Jul 28 2015, 11:05 AM
Post #19


Losing my mind...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,476
Joined: 26-May 06
From: Charlotte, NC
Member No.: 6,073
Region Association: South East States



OK, I must be a moron (don't agree with me!!). I am looking at the '1981 IMSA GTP Chassis Rules" book and can't find 916/6 listed.

EDIT: never mind, I found it. 11.4.8.2
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
naro914
post Jul 28 2015, 12:03 PM
Post #20


Losing my mind...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,476
Joined: 26-May 06
From: Charlotte, NC
Member No.: 6,073
Region Association: South East States



so here are two documents that Jack sent me at one point....GTO and GTU specs.

Seems to me that I could run Papa Smurf with a 3.2 engine, no wing or splitter, in GTO. If I went to a 2.999 engine, it could be GTU.

Is that how you read it??



Attached File(s)
Attached File  IMSA_GTO_08.pdf ( 80.65k ) Number of downloads: 80
Attached File  IMSA_GTU_08.pdf ( 86.36k ) Number of downloads: 77
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th May 2024 - 12:48 PM