Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Which is more cost effective- /6 head options
tornik550
post Dec 30 2014, 11:48 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,248
Joined: 29-January 07
From: Ohio
Member No.: 7,486
Region Association: None



I would like heads with 2.7l port sizes for my /6. I currently have a very nice set of rebuilt 2.2l heads and I have the opportunity to obtain 2.7l heads for a very reasonable price however they need rebuilt. Both heads have the same valve sizes.

Which would be more cost effective-

1. Have the 2.2l heads ported to 2.7l port sizes?

or

2. Have the 2.7l heads rebuilt? (I know that it is difficult to give an exact rebuild price without inspecting the heads- just looking for educated guesses)


Please stick with the two above options (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Dec 30 2014, 11:57 AM
Post #2


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(tornik550 @ Dec 30 2014, 12:48 PM) *


Please stick with the two above options (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)

#3 just machine port the intake openings, way cheaper than a full port job.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tornik550
post Dec 30 2014, 12:31 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,248
Joined: 29-January 07
From: Ohio
Member No.: 7,486
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Dec 30 2014, 12:57 PM) *

QUOTE(tornik550 @ Dec 30 2014, 12:48 PM) *


Please stick with the two above options (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)

#3 just machine port the intake openings, way cheaper than a full port job.



So I am going to look very ignorant here but is this option a legitimate option? I thought that the 2.7l exhaust ports were larger than the 2.2l? I realize that his may be a joke however I wanted to check.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Dec 30 2014, 01:31 PM
Post #4


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



No, not a joke. Laughing you only give 2 options.

I'm just saying porting to me is reshaping the whole ports, bench flowing, etc., thus expensive. Just opening the ports a bit on a milling machine will be a lot faster and the results are consistently the same.
Machine the exhausts as well.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tornik550
post Dec 30 2014, 01:37 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,248
Joined: 29-January 07
From: Ohio
Member No.: 7,486
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Dec 30 2014, 02:31 PM) *

No, not a joke.
I'm just saying porting to me is reshaping the whole ports, bench flowing, etc., thus expensive. Just opening the ports a bit on a milling machine will be a lot faster and the results are consistently the same.
Machine the exhausts as well.


Do you know anyone who can machine port?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Dec 30 2014, 01:47 PM
Post #6


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(tornik550 @ Dec 30 2014, 02:37 PM) *

QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Dec 30 2014, 02:31 PM) *

No, not a joke.
I'm just saying porting to me is reshaping the whole ports, bench flowing, etc., thus expensive. Just opening the ports a bit on a milling machine will be a lot faster and the results are consistently the same.
Machine the exhausts as well.


Do you know anyone who can machine port?

I can, but I'm in Canada.
Any good shop should be able to, but I'd talk to cgarr over on the bird board.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Dec 30 2014, 05:01 PM
Post #7


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,584
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



i am inclined to agree with Mark here.

if the valve sizes are the same, and the heads are rebuilt you have the base setup for what you need.

Using todays technology, you should be able to machine everything identical.

Do you have head flow charts for both sets of heads?
Have you given any thought to what you will be gaining for the money if you do this work on the heads?


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
Two options is not acceptable on this forum, we can make up at least 9 more options.
Lets get Mueller in this and Dave...that will give you at least three or four more choices...

rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gereed75
post Dec 30 2014, 05:48 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,247
Joined: 19-March 13
From: Pittsburgh PA
Member No.: 15,674
Region Association: North East States



Just had a set of 2.4 head ports taken from 30 to 36 by Craig Garrett (Cgarr). Great service, great work and very reasonable. Talk with him. He is very easy to deal with and helpful.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2024 - 12:55 PM