Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Fire Suppression System, Suggestions wanted
Cairo94507
post Jan 16 2015, 09:05 AM
Post #1


Michael
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 1-November 08
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 9,712
Region Association: Northern California



Hi Everyone - As my car moves forward I think it is time to consider a small fire suppression system for the engine compartment. I would like something with maybe 3 nozzles which can be strategically placed to address a possible engine compartment fire.

I am hoping some of our members may have experience with these and would be willing to make a recommendation as to what is a neat, compact system. I want to get it mocked up before we move along to paint in case Scotty needs to weld in any brackets, etc. So please let me hear your thoughts.

Oh, this is going to be a stock 3.2 Motronic engine if that helps.

Thanks for your collective wisdom in helping me reduce the chance of an engine fire which consumes my car.

Michael
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
76-914
post Jan 16 2015, 09:13 AM
Post #2


Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,497
Joined: 23-January 09
From: Temecula, CA
Member No.: 9,964
Region Association: Southern California



http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pspa...phoenix1301.php
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iamchappy
post Jan 16 2015, 09:17 AM
Post #3


It all happens so fast!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,893
Joined: 5-November 03
From: minnetonka, mn
Member No.: 1,315
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I went with a SPA unit i purchased from Pegusas Racing. Very easy install with push on connectors. I have nozzels placed above and below engine.

https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/advcat.as...yID=FIRESYSTEMS


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Jan 16 2015, 10:23 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



I used this:
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productde....asp?RecID=3431

There are different models. One supports 2 nozzles and one supports 3 nozzles.

Here's my installation:
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i366.photobucket.com-10819-1421425437.1.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jan 16 2015, 10:54 AM
Post #5


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,984
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



Different agents are available, as well:

Some of the dry chemical extinguishers are corrosive. They will eat wiring insulation and aluminum. They're almost impossible to clean up, too. I'm not sure if all of them are, these days, but try to avoid those.

The halon extinguishers work quite well, but obviously halon is harder to find now and rather more $$ than it used to be. Halon is also less effective in open areas where the wind can blow it away.

Old-fashioned CO2 is heavier and bulkier than the above. It can work well in enclosed spaces especially, but moving air will tend to dissipate it.

There are foam extinguishing agents that seem to work better in areas with air flow, but they make a mess and may be heavier and bulkier than halon or dry chem.

In a race car, there is generally one (or more) nozzle pointed at the engine, one pointed at the driver, and often but not always one at the fuel cell. The idea is go give the driver time to exit the vehicle, not to save the car.

It is possible that the CO2 can cool hot parts enough to keep them from re-starting a fire. I think the foam is supposed to be persistent enough to have a real shot at keeping fires from re-starting. But the dry-chem and halon are just for temporary supression.

Most extinguisher systems are used by racers. Check the Paddock section of this BBS, and the Racing section of the Pelican BBS, for lots more discussion.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cairo94507
post Jan 16 2015, 12:27 PM
Post #6


Michael
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 1-November 08
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 9,712
Region Association: Northern California



Great info so far but I definitely want to hear more opinions. I will not be racing this car and really am looking for a system that will save the car in the event a fire starts. I definitely do not want something that starts eating wiring and aluminum.....not like these cars do not have enough issues with the natural elements eating them up.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Jan 16 2015, 01:27 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



One thing I forgot to mention about my system: It uses water as part of the supressant, so it cannot be stored outside in freezing weather.

That's probably a show-stopper for a street car.
I never checked to see if you could put some anti-freeze in with the mix.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Jan 16 2015, 02:56 PM
Post #8


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,260
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I don't think you need one. Your will be fastidious about making sure all the lines and connectors are in perfect condition. You will not be driving the car to any extreme. You will be checking it often. You will have full coverage insurance. I think it's just dead weight in your car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PanelBilly
post Jan 16 2015, 03:29 PM
Post #9


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,805
Joined: 23-July 06
From: Kent, Wa
Member No.: 6,488
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I've thought about adding a system too, but concluded that the best protection was just to make sure there weren't any leaks and that the lines were routed out of the way.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Jan 16 2015, 03:34 PM
Post #10


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,345
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



I run an AFFF sire foam system. It's refillable by me and runs off a gas cartridge, CO2 or something. It is not allowed by all racing bodies so I keep a fire extinguisher too. It dumps fire foam on the engine, I aimed the nozzles at the fuel rail and intake manifold.

This is the system I run.

https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productde....asp?RecID=3431

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bandjoey
post Jan 16 2015, 06:32 PM
Post #11


bandjoey
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,925
Joined: 26-September 07
From: Bedford Tx
Member No.: 8,156
Region Association: Southwest Region



Racer Chris fuel lines to eliminate fire possibilities (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Jan 16 2015, 07:04 PM
Post #12


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,581
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(bandjoey @ Jan 16 2015, 04:32 PM) *

Racer Chris fuel lines to eliminate fire possibilities (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Run that by Jamie Rust... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)

More than one way to have a fire. Fuel lines are just one of them...

Good way to cut down on the possibilities though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Jan 16 2015, 07:32 PM
Post #13


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,345
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



I added my fire system so I would never need to use it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cairo94507
post Jan 16 2015, 08:24 PM
Post #14


Michael
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 1-November 08
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 9,712
Region Association: Northern California



I already have the Tangerine Racing SS fuel lines. Mark has a point, I am diligent but part of me still wants to have the added security of a fire system. But maybe the two nozzle system will be sufficient instead of 3 nozzles. Here is what I was considering after Chappy, Stugray and Mike all recommended Pegasus:
https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productde....asp?RecID=7024
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iamchappy
post Jan 16 2015, 08:48 PM
Post #15


It all happens so fast!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,893
Joined: 5-November 03
From: minnetonka, mn
Member No.: 1,315
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I went for foam as i believe it is the best at preventing the fire from restarting. With gas i've heard fire was extinquished but restarted after all the gas that puts it out, was used up, and the car ends up burning up after all.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cairo94507
post Jan 16 2015, 09:33 PM
Post #16


Michael
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 1-November 08
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 9,712
Region Association: Northern California



HHHMMMMMMM......OK so I think Chappy, Mike and stugray have convinced me to go with foam- thank you very much guys.

The AFFF (foam) system is water soluble and environmentally safe too. Even though the system can accommodate 3 nozzles, I think two will be sufficient. I will check this thread again tomorrow and see if by chance another system is recommended but we may have a winner here. The system sells for $339 which seems like a reasonable investment in my car.

I wonder if the insurance company would also cut me a break on my rate?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Jan 16 2015, 10:32 PM
Post #17


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,345
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Cairo94507 @ Jan 16 2015, 07:33 PM) *

HHHMMMMMMM......OK so I think Chappy, Mike and stugray have convinced me to go with foam- thank you very much guys.

The AFFF (foam) system is water soluble and environmentally safe too. Even though the system can accommodate 3 nozzles, I think two will be sufficient. I will check this thread again tomorrow and see if by chance another system is recommended but we may have a winner here. The system sells for $339 which seems like a reasonable investment in my car.

I wonder if the insurance company would also cut me a break on my rate?

I'm itching to pull the handle to see what it does. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/evilgrin.gif)

I just don't want to clean the mess. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

An ounce of prevention... I hope I never need it, but it's there just in case.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Jan 16 2015, 10:52 PM
Post #18


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mike Bellis @ Jan 16 2015, 09:32 PM) *


I'm itching to pull the handle to see what it does. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/evilgrin.gif)

I just don't want to clean the mess. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)

An ounce of prevention... I hope I never need it, but it's there just in case.


My brother installed one in his TR4 and triggered it by accident.
I wasnt there but he said IT SURE WORKS! and that it was easy to clean up.

There was no evidence afterwards.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cairo94507
post Jan 20 2015, 08:53 AM
Post #19


Michael
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,745
Joined: 1-November 08
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 9,712
Region Association: Northern California



OK- after considering all of the options I went with this system, AFFF, because I appreciate that the foam will not only extinguish a fire but hopefully keep it from reigniting. Of course water clean up is a bonus too.

I am sure I will sleep better knowing if I am crushing around and a fire starts, this will extinguish it immediately - absent operator error (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)

Thanks for all of the input, links and opinions - this site is terrific and I could not be building this car w/o the help and wisdom of all here.

Link: https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/productde....asp?RecID=3431
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ThePaintedMan
post Jan 20 2015, 02:05 PM
Post #20


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,886
Joined: 6-September 11
From: St. Petersburg, FL
Member No.: 13,527
Region Association: South East States



I have the FireSense AFFF system in my car. AFFF foam, as said before is non-toxic and won't destroy other components like the old chemicals used to.

It's important to note that decreasing the number of nozzles, while not covering as much area will increase the amount of time the suppression occurs over and the amount of foam being sprayed into a given area.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th May 2024 - 06:27 PM