Need Raby 9590 cam info |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Need Raby 9590 cam info |
Frank S |
May 8 2015, 08:40 AM
Post
#21
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 135 Joined: 15-April 15 From: Wiesbaden, Germany Member No.: 18,632 Region Association: Germany |
Happier with a stock cam, no. A stock cam engine get max 95-100hp on a great day most don't even come close to that on a dyne. The Raby cam wakes up the engine to 115-120hp and runs cooler. Yes, it takes time to tune the MPS and get the timing right but big deal. Oh and it idles at 1000rpms and sounds great. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Hi Geoff, it looks like I'll oder a cam kit from TypeIVStore and use just the upper part of it with a stock cam in first place. If the car is once registered I can upgrade with the 9590 and the lower valve train plus springs... Much easier to dial everything in if I can drive the car. Are you running the original distributor with a limitation on centrifugal? Best Regards, Frank |
Dave_Darling |
May 8 2015, 10:02 AM
Post
#22
|
914 Idiot Group: Members Posts: 14,981 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California |
|
SirAndy |
May 8 2015, 10:19 AM
Post
#23
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,614 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
No, I mean that the CA guys don't actually have much experience with getting the 9500-series cams past the sniffer test. Because very few 914s actually have to pass those. Ok, now your post makes sense. You could have said that the first time around ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
Highland |
Oct 27 2015, 12:03 AM
Post
#24
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 8-August 11 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 13,418 Region Association: Southern California |
To get the recommended 14 degrees BTDC at idle is there a recommended distributor or modification?
The best I can do is 6 degrees BTDC at idle with a maximum advance of 30 degrees at 3500+ rpm. |
euro911 |
Oct 27 2015, 02:04 AM
Post
#25
|
Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up! Group: Members Posts: 8,848 Joined: 2-December 06 From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA) Member No.: 7,300 Region Association: Southern California |
I'm sure there are some really knowledgeable gear heads here that could answer the question, but I'd also post it on the ShopTalk forum.
My 2056 with a 9580 cam is running a VJR-4-BR-8 from a 36HP VW Bus Bus & Pickup Mar 1955-1959 * 36HP Distributor: VW 211-905-205E, Bosch VJR 4 BR 8/1 (0231 129 019) Can Use: Points: 01 001 Condenser: 02 170 Rotor: 1237 332 072 (NLA) - Can use 04 008 Cap: 03 019 Coil: 00 001 (Blue Coil: 00 016) Vacuum Can: None Ignition Wires: 09 001 Spark Plug: W8AC Timing Set At:: 7.5° BTDC Static Advance/Retard Range: 27° @3400 RPM See diagram (Glenn, the ultimate dizzy guru, says the spring rates and weights are the same as the VJU-4-BR-8 and the VJU-BR-8 shown) You might want to contact him too: Link to Glenn's site |
Jake Raby |
Oct 27 2015, 08:18 AM
Post
#26
|
Engine Surgeon Group: Members Posts: 9,394 Joined: 31-August 03 From: Lost Member No.: 1,095 Region Association: South East States |
To get the recommended 14 degrees BTDC at idle is there a recommended distributor or modification? The best I can do is 6 degrees BTDC at idle with a maximum advance of 30 degrees at 3500+ rpm. Then your dizzy has too much built in advance. This must be limited to around 16 degrees, so you can achieve 12-14* at idle, and 28-30* degrees at full advance. This makes a world of difference in idle quality, as well as all around performance, and fuel economy, not to mention CHT and OT control. |
toon1 |
Oct 27 2015, 09:22 AM
Post
#27
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
To get the recommended 14 degrees BTDC at idle is there a recommended distributor or modification? The best I can do is 6 degrees BTDC at idle with a maximum advance of 30 degrees at 3500+ rpm. Then your dizzy has too much built in advance. This must be limited to around 16 degrees, so you can achieve 12-14* at idle, and 28-30* degrees at full advance. This makes a world of difference in idle quality, as well as all around performance, and fuel economy, not to mention CHT and OT control. Since we're on this subject( and a slight hijack)..... Jake, do you have a suggested timing curve you can post for these cams? I've been tuning and things are going good but one thing that has me stuck is the correct timing at different RPM's. BTW...I went in to adjust my rockers this w/e and after about 3500 miles, it was not needed. Been running B.P. oil and it's been working great! |
Highland |
Oct 27 2015, 10:59 AM
Post
#28
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 8-August 11 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 13,418 Region Association: Southern California |
Can someone tell me the solution to limiting the advance on my distributor?
I'm not sure how to proceed to solve the problem. |
Highland |
Oct 27 2015, 05:29 PM
Post
#29
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 512 Joined: 8-August 11 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 13,418 Region Association: Southern California |
Is everyone else running a programmable ignition controller when using the rat 9590 with d-jet?
Would I need to purchase something like an MSD 6A to use a RAT 9590 cam? |
Jake Raby |
Oct 28 2015, 10:31 PM
Post
#30
|
Engine Surgeon Group: Members Posts: 9,394 Joined: 31-August 03 From: Lost Member No.: 1,095 Region Association: South East States |
Is everyone else running a programmable ignition controller when using the rat 9590 with d-jet? Would I need to purchase something like an MSD 6A to use a RAT 9590 cam? Absolutely not. Most have stock distributors, set up as factory, or with DIY modified advance limitations. I know of no one using an external gadget like you mention with the 9590, or the 9550 camshafts. |
914_teener |
Oct 29 2015, 05:16 PM
Post
#31
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,197 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California |
The type IV Store does not offer the 9550.
Am I missing something? |
TheCabinetmaker |
Oct 29 2015, 05:50 PM
Post
#32
|
I drive my car everyday Group: Members Posts: 8,300 Joined: 8-May 03 From: Tulsa, Ok. Member No.: 666 |
The 9550 is an earlier version of the 9590.
|
toon1 |
Oct 29 2015, 09:38 PM
Post
#33
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
The type IV Store does not offer the 9550. Am I missing something? The 9550 isn't offered anymore. I have one in my car. Not a "power cam" but I am getting 39mpg out of the 1.7. I'd like to see how the 1.7 would perform with the 9590 but I don't think it would get the MPG's. |
Jake Raby |
Oct 30 2015, 08:06 AM
Post
#34
|
Engine Surgeon Group: Members Posts: 9,394 Joined: 31-August 03 From: Lost Member No.: 1,095 Region Association: South East States |
The type IV Store does not offer the 9550. Am I missing something? The 9550 isn't offered anymore. I have one in my car. Not a "power cam" but I am getting 39mpg out of the 1.7. I'd like to see how the 1.7 would perform with the 9590 but I don't think it would get the MPG's. The intake profile of each is exactly the same between 9550 and 9590. The exhaust profile slightly changed to be more compliant with ethanol and oxygenated fuels. |
toon1 |
Oct 30 2015, 08:31 AM
Post
#35
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
The type IV Store does not offer the 9550. Am I missing something? The 9550 isn't offered anymore. I have one in my car. Not a "power cam" but I am getting 39mpg out of the 1.7. I'd like to see how the 1.7 would perform with the 9590 but I don't think it would get the MPG's. The intake profile of each is exactly the same between 9550 and 9590. The exhaust profile slightly changed to be more compliant with ethanol and oxygenated fuels. I've been doing a lot of tuning lately and it seems like the cam likes a lot of timing on rpm ramp up. My idle timing is 14*, by 2200 rpm I'm already at 24*, 28-29* at 3500. No ping lots of power and 15:1 Afr on light throttle( around town driving). Freeway I can cruise around 70 with good MAP and about 14.5:1 AFR. |
914work |
Oct 30 2015, 08:39 AM
Post
#36
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 291 Joined: 9-November 11 Member No.: 13,762 Region Association: None |
Now THAT'S useful information.
|
toon1 |
Oct 30 2015, 08:52 AM
Post
#37
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
Now THAT'S useful information. I'm running megasquirt so I can control the Timing and fueling. I am just now starting to realize how much of a benefit this is for these engines.unfortunately my poor little 1.7 has been the abused sacrifice of my FI learning curve. |
914_teener |
Oct 30 2015, 09:10 AM
Post
#38
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,197 Joined: 31-August 08 From: So. Cal Member No.: 9,489 Region Association: Southern California |
Now THAT'S useful information. I'm running megasquirt so I can control the Timing and fueling. I am just now starting to realize how much of a benefit this is for these engines.unfortunately my poor little 1.7 has been the abused sacrifice of my FI learning curve. I am more in line with the original post. I have been looking at this cam for a while for a 2056 with stock injection. Geoff (Bleyseng) says it requires some adjustment of the MPS. I'll assume he is running a stock distributor. His feedback is very positive. I think it is almost mandatory to have a CHT gauge and AFR gauge or instrumentation for tuning. All I have left to do is choose the cam. |
toon1 |
Oct 30 2015, 10:06 AM
Post
#39
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,849 Joined: 29-October 05 From: tracy,ca Member No.: 5,022 |
The cam ( IIRC) was designed for stock FI.
If you had an AFR gauge there is not much adjustment that can be made. CHT...IMHO is a must, just to know when the temps start to rise you can back off or pull over and let it cool. don't scrimp, spend the money and get the Dakota digital |
Frank S |
Oct 30 2015, 12:28 PM
Post
#40
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 135 Joined: 15-April 15 From: Wiesbaden, Germany Member No.: 18,632 Region Association: Germany |
I've ordered all the parts I need for the rebuild and the last open question I have is:
What is the optimum CR for 9590 if I build up the 2056 from 2.0 D-Jet for a 914. Once Jake reported very good results with a 9560 cam and a CR of 8.8 : 1 and I'm not sure if I should go for CR of 9 : 1 with my build. Any recommendations? Thanks, Frank |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th May 2024 - 12:26 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |