Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Need Raby 9590 cam info
Frank S
post May 8 2015, 08:40 AM
Post #21


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 135
Joined: 15-April 15
From: Wiesbaden, Germany
Member No.: 18,632
Region Association: Germany



QUOTE(Bleyseng @ May 8 2015, 03:28 PM) *

Happier with a stock cam, no. A stock cam engine get max 95-100hp on a great day most don't even come close to that on a dyne.
The Raby cam wakes up the engine to 115-120hp and runs cooler. Yes, it takes time to tune the MPS and get the timing right but big deal. Oh and it idles at 1000rpms and sounds great. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)


Hi Geoff,
it looks like I'll oder a cam kit from TypeIVStore and use just the upper part of it with a stock cam in first place. If the car is once registered I can upgrade with the 9590 and the lower valve train plus springs...
Much easier to dial everything in if I can drive the car.

Are you running the original distributor with a limitation on centrifugal?

Best Regards,
Frank
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post May 8 2015, 10:02 AM
Post #22


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,981
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(worn @ May 7 2015, 06:33 PM) *

You mean that the poster is being tested in Germany not California?


No, I mean that the CA guys don't actually have much experience with getting the 9500-series cams past the sniffer test. Because very few 914s actually have to pass those.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post May 8 2015, 10:19 AM
Post #23


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,614
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Dave_Darling @ May 8 2015, 09:02 AM) *
No, I mean that the CA guys don't actually have much experience with getting the 9500-series cams past the sniffer test. Because very few 914s actually have to pass those.

Ok, now your post makes sense. You could have said that the first time around ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/poke.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Highland
post Oct 27 2015, 12:03 AM
Post #24


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 512
Joined: 8-August 11
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 13,418
Region Association: Southern California



To get the recommended 14 degrees BTDC at idle is there a recommended distributor or modification?

The best I can do is 6 degrees BTDC at idle with a maximum advance of 30 degrees at 3500+ rpm.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
euro911
post Oct 27 2015, 02:04 AM
Post #25


Retired & living the dream. God help me if I wake up!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,848
Joined: 2-December 06
From: So.Cal. & No.AZ (USA)
Member No.: 7,300
Region Association: Southern California



I'm sure there are some really knowledgeable gear heads here that could answer the question, but I'd also post it on the ShopTalk forum.

My 2056 with a 9580 cam is running a VJR-4-BR-8 from a 36HP VW Bus

Attached Image


Bus & Pickup Mar 1955-1959 * 36HP

Distributor: VW 211-905-205E, Bosch VJR 4 BR 8/1 (0231 129 019)
Can Use:
Points: 01 001
Condenser: 02 170
Rotor: 1237 332 072 (NLA) - Can use 04 008
Cap: 03 019
Coil: 00 001 (Blue Coil: 00 016)
Vacuum Can: None
Ignition Wires: 09 001
Spark Plug: W8AC
Timing Set At:: 7.5° BTDC Static
Advance/Retard Range: 27° @3400 RPM See diagram (Glenn, the ultimate dizzy guru, says the spring rates and weights are the same as the VJU-4-BR-8 and the VJU-BR-8 shown)

Attached Image


You might want to contact him too: Link to Glenn's site
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 27 2015, 08:18 AM
Post #26


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Highland @ Oct 26 2015, 10:03 PM) *

To get the recommended 14 degrees BTDC at idle is there a recommended distributor or modification?

The best I can do is 6 degrees BTDC at idle with a maximum advance of 30 degrees at 3500+ rpm.


Then your dizzy has too much built in advance. This must be limited to around 16 degrees, so you can achieve 12-14* at idle, and 28-30* degrees at full advance.

This makes a world of difference in idle quality, as well as all around performance, and fuel economy, not to mention CHT and OT control.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
toon1
post Oct 27 2015, 09:22 AM
Post #27


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 29-October 05
From: tracy,ca
Member No.: 5,022



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Oct 27 2015, 07:18 AM) *

QUOTE(Highland @ Oct 26 2015, 10:03 PM) *

To get the recommended 14 degrees BTDC at idle is there a recommended distributor or modification?

The best I can do is 6 degrees BTDC at idle with a maximum advance of 30 degrees at 3500+ rpm.


Then your dizzy has too much built in advance. This must be limited to around 16 degrees, so you can achieve 12-14* at idle, and 28-30* degrees at full advance.

This makes a world of difference in idle quality, as well as all around performance, and fuel economy, not to mention CHT and OT control.


Since we're on this subject( and a slight hijack).....

Jake, do you have a suggested timing curve you can post for these cams?

I've been tuning and things are going good but one thing that has me stuck is the correct timing at different RPM's.

BTW...I went in to adjust my rockers this w/e and after about 3500 miles, it was not needed. Been running B.P. oil and it's been working great!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Highland
post Oct 27 2015, 10:59 AM
Post #28


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 512
Joined: 8-August 11
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 13,418
Region Association: Southern California



Can someone tell me the solution to limiting the advance on my distributor?

I'm not sure how to proceed to solve the problem.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Highland
post Oct 27 2015, 05:29 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 512
Joined: 8-August 11
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 13,418
Region Association: Southern California



Is everyone else running a programmable ignition controller when using the rat 9590 with d-jet?

Would I need to purchase something like an MSD 6A to use a RAT 9590 cam?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 28 2015, 10:31 PM
Post #30


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Highland @ Oct 27 2015, 03:29 PM) *

Is everyone else running a programmable ignition controller when using the rat 9590 with d-jet?

Would I need to purchase something like an MSD 6A to use a RAT 9590 cam?

Absolutely not. Most have stock distributors, set up as factory, or with DIY modified advance limitations.

I know of no one using an external gadget like you mention with the 9590, or the 9550 camshafts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 29 2015, 05:16 PM
Post #31


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,197
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



The type IV Store does not offer the 9550.

Am I missing something?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TheCabinetmaker
post Oct 29 2015, 05:50 PM
Post #32


I drive my car everyday
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,300
Joined: 8-May 03
From: Tulsa, Ok.
Member No.: 666



The 9550 is an earlier version of the 9590.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
toon1
post Oct 29 2015, 09:38 PM
Post #33


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 29-October 05
From: tracy,ca
Member No.: 5,022



QUOTE(914_teener @ Oct 29 2015, 04:16 PM) *

The type IV Store does not offer the 9550.

Am I missing something?


The 9550 isn't offered anymore. I have one in my car. Not a "power cam" but I am getting 39mpg out of the 1.7.

I'd like to see how the 1.7 would perform with the 9590 but I don't think it would get the MPG's.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Oct 30 2015, 08:06 AM
Post #34


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(toon1 @ Oct 29 2015, 07:38 PM) *

QUOTE(914_teener @ Oct 29 2015, 04:16 PM) *

The type IV Store does not offer the 9550.

Am I missing something?


The 9550 isn't offered anymore. I have one in my car. Not a "power cam" but I am getting 39mpg out of the 1.7.

I'd like to see how the 1.7 would perform with the 9590 but I don't think it would get the MPG's.


The intake profile of each is exactly the same between 9550 and 9590. The exhaust profile slightly changed to be more compliant with ethanol and oxygenated fuels.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
toon1
post Oct 30 2015, 08:31 AM
Post #35


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 29-October 05
From: tracy,ca
Member No.: 5,022



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Oct 30 2015, 07:06 AM) *

QUOTE(toon1 @ Oct 29 2015, 07:38 PM) *

QUOTE(914_teener @ Oct 29 2015, 04:16 PM) *

The type IV Store does not offer the 9550.

Am I missing something?


The 9550 isn't offered anymore. I have one in my car. Not a "power cam" but I am getting 39mpg out of the 1.7.

I'd like to see how the 1.7 would perform with the 9590 but I don't think it would get the MPG's.


The intake profile of each is exactly the same between 9550 and 9590. The exhaust profile slightly changed to be more compliant with ethanol and oxygenated fuels.


I've been doing a lot of tuning lately and it seems like the cam likes a lot of timing on rpm ramp up.

My idle timing is 14*, by 2200 rpm I'm already at 24*, 28-29* at 3500. No ping lots of power and 15:1 Afr on light throttle( around town driving).
Freeway I can cruise around 70 with good MAP and about 14.5:1 AFR.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914work
post Oct 30 2015, 08:39 AM
Post #36


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 291
Joined: 9-November 11
Member No.: 13,762
Region Association: None



Now THAT'S useful information.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
toon1
post Oct 30 2015, 08:52 AM
Post #37


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 29-October 05
From: tracy,ca
Member No.: 5,022



QUOTE(914werke @ Oct 30 2015, 07:39 AM) *

Now THAT'S useful information.


I'm running megasquirt so I can control the Timing and fueling.

I am just now starting to realize how much of a benefit this is for these engines.unfortunately my poor little 1.7 has been the abused sacrifice of my FI learning curve.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 30 2015, 09:10 AM
Post #38


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,197
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(toon1 @ Oct 30 2015, 07:52 AM) *

QUOTE(914werke @ Oct 30 2015, 07:39 AM) *

Now THAT'S useful information.


I'm running megasquirt so I can control the Timing and fueling.

I am just now starting to realize how much of a benefit this is for these engines.unfortunately my poor little 1.7 has been the abused sacrifice of my FI learning curve.



I am more in line with the original post.

I have been looking at this cam for a while for a 2056 with stock injection.

Geoff (Bleyseng) says it requires some adjustment of the MPS. I'll assume he is running a stock distributor.

His feedback is very positive. I think it is almost mandatory to have a CHT gauge and AFR gauge or instrumentation for tuning.

All I have left to do is choose the cam.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
toon1
post Oct 30 2015, 10:06 AM
Post #39


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,849
Joined: 29-October 05
From: tracy,ca
Member No.: 5,022



The cam ( IIRC) was designed for stock FI.

If you had an AFR gauge there is not much adjustment that can be made.

CHT...IMHO is a must, just to know when the temps start to rise you can back off or pull over and let it cool. don't scrimp, spend the money and get the Dakota digital
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Frank S
post Oct 30 2015, 12:28 PM
Post #40


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 135
Joined: 15-April 15
From: Wiesbaden, Germany
Member No.: 18,632
Region Association: Germany



I've ordered all the parts I need for the rebuild and the last open question I have is:
What is the optimum CR for 9590 if I build up the 2056 from 2.0 D-Jet for a 914.
Once Jake reported very good results with a 9560 cam and a CR of 8.8 : 1 and I'm not sure if I should go for CR of 9 : 1 with my build.
Any recommendations?
Thanks,
Frank
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th May 2024 - 12:26 AM