Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Difference between 73/74 & 75/75 2.0?
KenH
post Feb 25 2005, 12:50 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 680
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Gilroy, CA
Member No.: 156



The new GGR Points Classification System seperates the 73/74 & 75/75 2.0s.

They say:

The '73-'74s have a 21.4 lb/hp ratio

and

The '75-'76s have a 26.8 lb/hp ratio.

I cannot find any difference in the books I have.

Is there a difference between the two ??

If so what publication is in??

Thanks,

Ken
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nebreitling
post Feb 25 2005, 01:02 AM
Post #2


Member Emeritus
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-March 03
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 478



whoa! you're right... this is new, why did they pop this now?

21.4 vs 26.8 seems a little too far spread even after the smog equipment, poor exhaust, and extra heavy bumpers....

guess it's time to reclassify the car..
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nebreitling
post Feb 25 2005, 01:06 AM
Post #3


Member Emeritus
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-March 03
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 478



looks like it's just a difference in TT points -- not AX.

http://sandbox.visualproduce.com/rulcomm_c...b/cars_list.php
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Reiche
post Feb 25 2005, 01:08 AM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 169
Joined: 13-October 04
From: Vista, CA
Member No.: 2,934



The '73-'74 2.0 made 95HP to the '75-'76 88HP. As for the weight difference, the '75-'76 model had the much heavier bumpers and smoggy stuff. Calculates to 2033 lbs. for the '73-'74, 2358 lbs. for the '75-'76. Seems a tad high to me for the late model, but I've ever weighed one.

Oops. Cross post
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
skline
post Feb 25 2005, 02:22 AM
Post #5


Born to Drive
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,910
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Member No.: 17
Region Association: Southern California



That seems backwards to me, the early had more power and should be higher than the 75/76. Something doesnt seem right.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Feb 25 2005, 02:32 AM
Post #6


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



What? Yes.

The ugly new one sucks, yes.


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Feb 25 2005, 08:53 AM
Post #7


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



The late ones have about 85lbs in 5 mph bumpers and the he's are heavier but 325lb difference, nah. I weighed mine on a truck scale with gas and it was in the 22xx range.

Its lighter now with the early bumpers, and SSI he's and Bursch muffler. Thats right, the banana oem muffler weight atleast 200lbs!


Geoff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dmenche914
post Feb 25 2005, 09:58 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,212
Joined: 27-February 03
From: California
Member No.: 366



what year did they add side impact door protection? It adds my guess of close to 40-50 lbs per door, them suckers are much heavier than the early doors.

So what year did they make the side impact change?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
skline
post Feb 25 2005, 10:04 AM
Post #9


Born to Drive
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,910
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Member No.: 17
Region Association: Southern California



That was added mid 73 to comply with saftey standards in the US.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rhodes71/914
post Feb 25 2005, 10:05 AM
Post #10


Glacier
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,374
Joined: 8-August 04
From: End of the Road, Alaska
Member No.: 2,482



QUOTE (dmenche914 @ Feb 25 2005, 07:58 AM)
what year did they add side impact door protection? It adds my guess of close to 40-50 lbs per door, them suckers are much heavier than the early doors.

So what year did they make the side impact change?

Dr 914 says 73 was the first year of the side impact doors making them more than twice as heavy, USA only.

They also had the 911 style window regulator.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Feb 25 2005, 10:10 AM
Post #11


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



It was mid 73. I have seen early 73's with early doors early regulators. Early doors and late regulators. Late doors and late regulators. They just grabbed whatever parts were there and stuck them on at Karmann using up old stock, heck why waste it.


Geoff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914ghost
post Feb 25 2005, 10:30 AM
Post #12


BOB
**

Group: Members
Posts: 406
Joined: 25-November 03
From: Wenatchee Washington
Member No.: 1,387



So, where's the HP difference?
Just the SMOG crap and a worse flowing exhaust?
7hp in a 914 is noticable but not a big fat deal really. I just bought a 76' 2.0 and was wondering this same thing.
Bob O
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Feb 25 2005, 10:34 AM
Post #13


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,315
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



The 914 I have now is a 10/72 car sold as a 73' of course. It has late regulators and no side beems. I haven't wieghed it, but would like to, just for reference.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rhodes71/914
post Feb 25 2005, 10:38 AM
Post #14


Glacier
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,374
Joined: 8-August 04
From: End of the Road, Alaska
Member No.: 2,482



Ok I guess I should have been more specific how about early-73 starting with vin #4732900.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Feb 25 2005, 10:44 AM
Post #15


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE (Root_Werks @ Feb 25 2005, 08:34 AM)
The 914 I have now is a 10/72 car sold as a 73' of course. It has late regulators and no side beems. I haven't wieghed it, but would like to, just for reference.

Whats its VIN?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MarkV
post Feb 25 2005, 11:05 AM
Post #16


Fear the Jack Stands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,493
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Sunny Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 154
Region Association: None



I have 4732906003 and it has late regulators and no side beams.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MarkG
post Feb 25 2005, 12:33 PM
Post #17


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 314
Joined: 24-May 04
From: Colorado Springs
Member No.: 2,102



Is it possible/how difficult to remove the side beams?

I have a '76, plan on FG bumpers and early exhaust. Any additional weight savings has to be good.......
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Feb 25 2005, 01:30 PM
Post #18


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,981
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE (skline @ Feb 25 2005, 12:22 AM)
That seems backwards to me, the early had more power and should be higher than the 75/76. Something doesnt seem right.

Something isn't right--your understanding of ratios. The stated ratio is lbs/hp, not hp/lb. Higher, in this case, is worse.


You can cut the door beams out of the later doors if you can get your angle grinder inside the door. The only ones I've seen had already had the door webbing gutted; I don't think the window mechanisms were in there either.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Feb 25 2005, 01:36 PM
Post #19


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



I don't have a door here to look at, but how much could those flimsy little bars weigh? And (again) we run into insurance liability issues .................................... The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
KenH
post Feb 25 2005, 04:24 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 680
Joined: 16-January 03
From: Gilroy, CA
Member No.: 156



Dave,

The email I got from the rules guy is "lb/hp".

I do not know where he got his info.

I was hoping somebody had Porsche documentation as to what the differences are.

Ken
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd May 2024 - 01:15 PM