914 front suspension upgrade, 930 front suspension not the way to go? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
914 front suspension upgrade, 930 front suspension not the way to go? |
billium01 |
Jun 3 2016, 05:36 PM
Post
#1
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 136 Joined: 12-April 13 Member No.: 15,764 Region Association: None |
Hello everyone,
I've scoured this forum dozens of times for info on 5 lug upgrades. Including the all your questions answered super thread on the subject. Talked to a knowledgeable fellow today and he said stay away from the 930 front end. It has undesirable anti dive geometry built in. He said go with early 911 suspension. Any thoughts on this? |
914Sixer |
Jun 3 2016, 05:55 PM
Post
#2
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 8,870 Joined: 17-January 05 From: San Angelo Texas Member No.: 3,457 Region Association: Southwest Region |
The only drawback that comes to mind is the weight and the fact that it is way overkill. You could spend the money better on other things. Not race inclined so I can't say about the dive issues.
|
Steve |
Jun 3 2016, 05:58 PM
Post
#3
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,570 Joined: 14-June 03 From: Orange County, CA Member No.: 822 Region Association: Southern California |
The only downside I heard is that the aluminum cross member flexes really bad compared to the early steel one. For a conversion the aluminum cross member supports bolting the fuel pump to it and it's also easier to adapt a hydraulic clutch to it.
It's also lighter. |
SirAndy |
Jun 3 2016, 05:59 PM
Post
#4
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,606 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
He said go with early 911 suspension. Not too early though. I have a complete frontend from a '84 Carrera in mine ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
SirAndy |
Jun 3 2016, 06:01 PM
Post
#5
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,606 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
It's also lighter. Yes, but the weight is as low to the ground as it will ever get and it's not unsprung weight. I wouldn't worry about the few grams more for a steel crossmember. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
Mueller |
Jun 3 2016, 07:14 PM
Post
#6
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
I cannot see how it has built in anti-dive...I think someone is making stuff up.
I'm 99% sure they have a wider track depending on the year (almost an inch per side?) |
Dave_Darling |
Jun 3 2016, 10:57 PM
Post
#7
|
914 Idiot Group: Members Posts: 14,981 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California |
I have heard the anti-dive thing before. But we had some people who measured the parts and found the dimensions and angles were identical... There may have been some difference in how they were mounted, but the parts were supposedly the same.
I wouldn't bother with 930 stuff mostly because it's going to be more expensive than plain old 911 parts. And it won't be any better for our purposes. --DD |
mgp4591 |
Jun 4 2016, 01:17 AM
Post
#8
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 5,367 Joined: 1-August 12 From: Salt Lake City Ut Member No.: 14,748 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
He said go with early 911 suspension. Not too early though. I have a complete frontend from a '84 Carrera in mine ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) For the uninitiated, what isn't desirable about an earlier 911 front suspension? And how early are we talking about? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) |
sixnotfour |
Jun 4 2016, 02:29 AM
Post
#9
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 10,412 Joined: 12-September 04 From: Life Elevated..planet UT. Member No.: 2,744 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
He said go with early 911 suspension. Not too early though. I have a complete frontend from a '84 Carrera in mine ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) For the uninitiated, what isn't desirable about an earlier 911 front suspension? And how early are we talking about? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) the ball joint is bolt on...most consider the 70s early not many remember the 60'z Attached image(s) |
sixnotfour |
Jun 4 2016, 02:43 AM
Post
#10
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 10,412 Joined: 12-September 04 From: Life Elevated..planet UT. Member No.: 2,744 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
I have heard the anti-dive thing before. But we had some people who measured the parts and found the dimensions and angles were identical... There may have been some difference in how they were mounted, but the parts were supposedly the same. I wouldn't bother with 930 stuff mostly because it's going to be more expensive than plain old 911 parts. And it won't be any better for our purposes. --DD the anti dive is built into the chassis ..not the suspension itself.. basically the rear mounting point is 21mm higher.. |
JFJ914 |
Jun 4 2016, 08:19 AM
Post
#11
|
Senior Member Group: Benefactors Posts: 813 Joined: 13-June 03 From: Alpharetta, GA Member No.: 814 Region Association: South East States |
Hello everyone, I've scoured this forum dozens of times for info on 5 lug upgrades. Including the all your questions answered super thread on the subject. Talked to a knowledgeable fellow today and he said stay away from the 930 front end. It has undesirable anti dive geometry built in. He said go with early 911 suspension. Any thoughts on this? The track is much wider w/the 930 and can only be used if the car flared. |
Luke M |
Jun 4 2016, 08:45 AM
Post
#12
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,369 Joined: 8-February 05 From: WNY Member No.: 3,574 Region Association: North East States |
Hello everyone, I've scoured this forum dozens of times for info on 5 lug upgrades. Including the all your questions answered super thread on the subject. Talked to a knowledgeable fellow today and he said stay away from the 930 front end. It has undesirable anti dive geometry built in. He said go with early 911 suspension. Any thoughts on this? The track is much wider w/the 930 and can only be used if the car flared. The 930 does have a wider track like some have said. The 930 parts are not cheap either. I had a 930 setup and sold it all because of these things. I instead went with the Boxster brake setup. It all works with either the 20 or 24 mm SC/Carrera rotors which are way cheaper to replace then the 930 ones. Get in touch with Rich Johnson he sells a hole setup. |
sixnotfour |
Jun 5 2016, 08:35 AM
Post
#13
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 10,412 Joined: 12-September 04 From: Life Elevated..planet UT. Member No.: 2,744 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
1976 930's have 1976 911S brakes with spacers to widen the track..
and 18mm sway bay through the body...this would be a sweet find.. you would need to install shorter studs though.. |
mepstein |
Jun 5 2016, 08:44 AM
Post
#14
|
914-6 GT in waiting Group: Members Posts: 19,244 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
Good point about "which year" 930 suspension. Like all 911 years, it changed from year to year. With the current rise in prices, it will cost you more to buy "930 suspension" than to buy the suspension pieces you want for the front of your car. A good place to start would be to read Eric Shea's article on five lug conversion. It covers different front strut options and the brake choices you will have with the struts.
|
billium01 |
Jun 6 2016, 06:06 PM
Post
#15
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 136 Joined: 12-April 13 Member No.: 15,764 Region Association: None |
thanks everyone for the input! Gonna keep an eye out for a 911 suspension.
|
racerbvd |
Jun 6 2016, 07:45 PM
Post
#16
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,368 Joined: 3-February 03 From: Sunny FL. Member No.: 226 Region Association: None |
|
jcd914 |
Jun 6 2016, 09:38 PM
Post
#17
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,081 Joined: 7-February 08 From: Sacramento, CA Member No.: 8,684 Region Association: Northern California |
On my 71, I went with struts & brakes off a 72 911T.
These have 3 inch caliper bolt spacing and pinch bolt ball joint attachment. Kept my 914 control arms, ball joints and t-bars. I have a set of Alfa Romeo Brembo caliper to add down the road. If you get 73 or latter you get the taper pin ball joint attachment, which is better. I think 911 went to 3 1/2 inch caliper bolt spacing in 1975 but I am not sure. Jim |
colingreene |
Jun 7 2016, 12:21 AM
Post
#18
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 729 Joined: 17-October 13 From: Southern California Member No.: 16,526 Region Association: Southern California |
My concern would be how stiff the torsion bars are. Might not be ideal with such a light car.
|
billium01 |
Jun 7 2016, 12:27 AM
Post
#19
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 136 Joined: 12-April 13 Member No.: 15,764 Region Association: None |
|
sixnotfour |
Jun 7 2016, 05:36 AM
Post
#20
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 10,412 Joined: 12-September 04 From: Life Elevated..planet UT. Member No.: 2,744 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Call John Walkers Workshop Seattle Wa. his inventory varies, but worth the call, and closer to you.
he is a great guy and very fair ...tell em Hines sent you 206 789 6800 don't ask too many 914 questions though.... |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 11:09 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |