Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ugh -Looks Like I have a Burned Exhaust valve, Just in time for Okteenerfest
Mblizzard
post Aug 7 2016, 06:29 PM
Post #21


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



Long day but found a few interesting things. Which one of these was not firing?

Attached Image

Well new heads going on within only minor issues.

Attached Image

One more,long day then back on road.



User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonewolfe
post Aug 7 2016, 06:47 PM
Post #22


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



Hey Mike! is this a stock size 2.0L motor? It seems to me that 44x38 valves would be too large for a 2.0L. How does the motor run differently with those large valves? What compression are you running and which cam? Are you still running the SSI's with the Tangerine Evo 4 muffler? I bought the same mufflwe from Tangerine after I heard the sound clips from your car!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 7 2016, 07:11 PM
Post #23


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 7 2016, 04:47 PM) *

Hey Mike! is this a stock size 2.0L motor? It seems to me that 44x38 valves would be too large for a 2.0L. How does the motor run differently with those large valves? What compression are you running and which cam? Are you still running the SSI's with the Tangerine Evo 4 muffler? I bought the same mufflwe from Tangerine after I heard the sound clips from your car!


It is a 2056 so the valves are not too big.

Leaving a bit on the table as I am still running stock cam. Will swap cam at some point to get into that 120 hp range.

Running SS heat exchangers. But planning to get the CFR headers at some point.

I had hoped to do cam and heads at the same time but the budget would not allow.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonewolfe
post Aug 7 2016, 07:36 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 7 2016, 06:11 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 7 2016, 04:47 PM) *

Hey Mike! is this a stock size 2.0L motor? It seems to me that 44x38 valves would be too large for a 2.0L. How does the motor run differently with those large valves? What compression are you running and which cam? Are you still running the SSI's with the Tangerine Evo 4 muffler? I bought the same mufflwe from Tangerine after I heard the sound clips from your car!


It is a 2056 so the valves are not too big.

Leaving a bit on the table as I am still running stock cam. Will swap cam at some point to get into that 120 hp range.

Running SS heat exchangers. But planning to get the CFR headers at some point.

I had hoped to do cam and heads at the same time but the budget would not allow.


I know all about that budget factor. Fortunately, I'm a pretty patient guy. Have you been happy with the Evo 4 muffler?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cwpeden
post Aug 7 2016, 07:50 PM
Post #25


Great White North, huh?
***

Group: Members
Posts: 916
Joined: 20-August 06
From: Victoria BC
Member No.: 6,693
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 6 2016, 06:08 PM) *

QUOTE(Bartlett 914 @ Aug 6 2016, 04:07 PM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 6 2016, 07:02 PM) *

QUOTE(stugray @ Aug 6 2016, 12:14 PM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 6 2016, 02:03 PM) *

Well engine out and torn down to the heads. Will start diggin in tomorrow.

Of course found more things to fix. CV joint fell apart on the passenger side. WTF? It is always something.

The CVs often 'fall apart' when removing the drivetrain, but was the cage broken?


Cage looked good but the clip on end was gone!

Is the clip really necessary? I would want one installed but I believe the shaft floats laterally in the bearing once installed.


I am pretty sure the clip is necessary. It is rare that parts are added that are not needed and the clip is present on most CV joints I have ever seen.


Pretty sure they serve a purpose...The CV was toast, both inner race and outer.
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Aug 7 2016, 07:56 PM
Post #26


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,579
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 7 2016, 08:29 PM) *

Long day but found a few interesting things. Which one of these was not firing?

Attached Image

Well new heads going on within only minor issues.

Attached Image

One more,long day then back on road.

Ignition related?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 8 2016, 04:15 AM
Post #27


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(r_towle @ Aug 7 2016, 05:56 PM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 7 2016, 08:29 PM) *

Long day but found a few interesting things. Which one of these was not firing?

Attached Image

Well new heads going on within only minor issues.

Attached Image

One more,long day then back on road.

Ignition related?


Pretty sure compression related. Less than 100 psi on the black cylinder.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 8 2016, 04:17 AM
Post #28


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 7 2016, 05:36 PM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 7 2016, 06:11 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 7 2016, 04:47 PM) *

Hey Mike! is this a stock size 2.0L motor? It seems to me that 44x38 valves would be too large for a 2.0L. How does the motor run differently with those large valves? What compression are you running and which cam? Are you still running the SSI's with the Tangerine Evo 4 muffler? I bought the same mufflwe from Tangerine after I heard the sound clips from your car!


It is a 2056 so the valves are not too big.

Leaving a bit on the table as I am still running stock cam. Will swap cam at some point to get into that 120 hp range.

Running SS heat exchangers. But planning to get the CFR headers at some point.

I had hoped to do cam and heads at the same time but the budget would not allow.



I know all about that budget factor. Fortunately, I'm a pretty patient guy. Have you been happy with the Evo 4 muffler?

Extremely happy with Evo. Great sound, well made, seems to add a bit of power right in the mid range, and looked really good!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
76-914
post Aug 8 2016, 01:23 PM
Post #29


Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,505
Joined: 23-January 09
From: Temecula, CA
Member No.: 9,964
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 8 2016, 03:15 AM) *

QUOTE(r_towle @ Aug 7 2016, 05:56 PM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 7 2016, 08:29 PM) *

Long day but found a few interesting things. Which one of these was not firing?

Attached Image

Well new heads going on within only minor issues.

Attached Image

One more,long day then back on road.

Ignition related?


Pretty sure compression related. Less than 100 psi on the black cylinder.

Did the leak down point at the exhaust or intake?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 8 2016, 01:40 PM
Post #30


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(76-914 @ Aug 8 2016, 11:23 AM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 8 2016, 03:15 AM) *

QUOTE(r_towle @ Aug 7 2016, 05:56 PM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 7 2016, 08:29 PM) *

Long day but found a few interesting things. Which one of these was not firing?

Attached Image

Well new heads going on within only minor issues.

Attached Image

One more,long day then back on road.

Ignition related?


Pretty sure compression related. Less than 100 psi on the black cylinder.

Did the leak down point at the exhaust or intake?


Exhaust.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 11 2016, 07:05 PM
Post #31


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



Well hopefully this weekend will see me driving again. It is funny haw many little pats it takes to get this done and how lucky we are to have some really good vendors.

PMB, Aasse, Ecklers, Bruce Stone, CFR, 914 Rubber, and others all supplied parts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 16 2016, 02:23 PM
Post #32


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



Well looks like it may have been a bit more serious than a valve.

That looks like a scratch that will buff out. Right?

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
76-914
post Aug 16 2016, 02:31 PM
Post #33


Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,505
Joined: 23-January 09
From: Temecula, CA
Member No.: 9,964
Region Association: Southern California



Uhhh, no!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonewolfe
post Aug 16 2016, 03:27 PM
Post #34


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 819
Joined: 12-September 11
From: Oakland, CA
Member No.: 13,549
Region Association: Northern California



I think the original 2.0 heads are no longer worth the money to repair. They always seem to crack. I have three sets of 2.0 heads and the all have cracks. Once you get them welded up a complete valve job with new seats and you're in the $1000 range and they're just going to crack again. It's a shame that nobody is making new 2.0 heads with modern alloys that are more durable. Thank goodness we at least have AMC heads to build up as replacements. Anyone have any cracking issues with AMC heads?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HAM Inc
post Aug 16 2016, 06:12 PM
Post #35


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 846
Joined: 24-July 06
From: Watkinsville,GA
Member No.: 6,499
Region Association: None



QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 16 2016, 02:27 PM) *

I think the original 2.0 heads are no longer worth the money to repair. They always seem to crack. I have three sets of 2.0 heads and the all have cracks. Once you get them welded up a complete valve job with new seats and you're in the $1000 range and they're just going to crack again. It's a shame that nobody is making new 2.0 heads with modern alloys that are more durable. Thank goodness we at least have AMC heads to build up as replacements. Anyone have any cracking issues with AMC heads?

So far I have yet to see an AMC head crack.

Seen them come back for service from track cars that ran over 1400* EGT's. Warped them and killed the valve job, but they didn't crack.

Seen them abused on CA busses with clogged catalytic converters that heated the heads so high it degraded the 1800* rated exhaust seats we install. Again, warped but not cracked.

They are very good castings, but the parts are garbage.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
craig downs
post Aug 16 2016, 07:21 PM
Post #36


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 768
Joined: 25-November 05
From: mira loma ca.
Member No.: 5,189
Region Association: Southern California



That's good to know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 16 2016, 07:28 PM
Post #37


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Aug 16 2016, 04:12 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 16 2016, 02:27 PM) *

I think the original 2.0 heads are no longer worth the money to repair. They always seem to crack. I have three sets of 2.0 heads and the all have cracks. Once you get them welded up a complete valve job with new seats and you're in the $1000 range and they're just going to crack again. It's a shame that nobody is making new 2.0 heads with modern alloys that are more durable. Thank goodness we at least have AMC heads to build up as replacements. Anyone have any cracking issues with AMC heads?

So far I have yet to see an AMC head crack.

Seen them come back for service from track cars that ran over 1400* EGT's. Warped them and killed the valve job, but they didn't crack.

Seen them abused on CA busses with clogged catalytic converters that heated the heads so high it degraded the 1800* rated exhaust seats we install. Again, warped but not cracked.

They are very good castings, but the parts are garbage.


If I ever do this again I will likely go the no 2.0 head.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HAM Inc
post Aug 17 2016, 02:50 AM
Post #38


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 846
Joined: 24-July 06
From: Watkinsville,GA
Member No.: 6,499
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 16 2016, 06:28 PM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Aug 16 2016, 04:12 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 16 2016, 02:27 PM) *

I think the original 2.0 heads are no longer worth the money to repair. They always seem to crack. I have three sets of 2.0 heads and the all have cracks. Once you get them welded up a complete valve job with new seats and you're in the $1000 range and they're just going to crack again. It's a shame that nobody is making new 2.0 heads with modern alloys that are more durable. Thank goodness we at least have AMC heads to build up as replacements. Anyone have any cracking issues with AMC heads?

So far I have yet to see an AMC head crack.

Seen them come back for service from track cars that ran over 1400* EGT's. Warped them and killed the valve job, but they didn't crack.

Seen them abused on CA busses with clogged catalytic converters that heated the heads so high it degraded the 1800* rated exhaust seats we install. Again, warped but not cracked.

They are very good castings, but the parts are garbage.


If I ever do this again I will likely go the no 2.0 head.


They're not cheap, but they are spectacular, more powerful and beefier than the O.E. castings.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Aug 17 2016, 06:06 AM
Post #39


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Aug 17 2016, 12:50 AM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Aug 16 2016, 06:28 PM) *

QUOTE(HAM Inc @ Aug 16 2016, 04:12 PM) *

QUOTE(lonewolfe @ Aug 16 2016, 02:27 PM) *

I think the original 2.0 heads are no longer worth the money to repair. They always seem to crack. I have three sets of 2.0 heads and the all have cracks. Once you get them welded up a complete valve job with new seats and you're in the $1000 range and they're just going to crack again. It's a shame that nobody is making new 2.0 heads with modern alloys that are more durable. Thank goodness we at least have AMC heads to build up as replacements. Anyone have any cracking issues with AMC heads?

So far I have yet to see an AMC head crack.

Seen them come back for service from track cars that ran over 1400* EGT's. Warped them and killed the valve job, but they didn't crack.

Seen them abused on CA busses with clogged catalytic converters that heated the heads so high it degraded the 1800* rated exhaust seats we install. Again, warped but not cracked.

They are very good castings, but the parts are garbage.


If I ever do this again I will likely go the no 2.0 head.


They're not cheap, but they are spectacular, more powerful and beefier than the O.E. castings.


I looked into them so I know. Really was not planning on this change but I think I will plan for the expense.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
malcolm2
post Aug 17 2016, 06:47 AM
Post #40


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,745
Joined: 31-May 11
From: Nashville
Member No.: 13,139
Region Association: South East States



So is everything back together? Jack stands back in the tool box?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 01:52 PM