Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> The charm of an early 1.7, What is it?
orthobiz
post Sep 19 2016, 05:51 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,754
Joined: 8-January 07
From: Cadillac, Michigan
Member No.: 7,438
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I'm looking at possibly buying an unmolested 1971 and as the owner of two 1974's, what is there to recommend the early cars? I'm thinking about the prone-to-failure window cranks, fixed passenger seat, unreinforced doors, oil bath air filter, tail shifter, central vent, etc. as potential liabilities rather than assets. Am I wrong? Gotta admit, I think steelies rule!

Also, is it possible to have textured seats with smooth vinyl door panels? Johnson's book says the textured seats were "available" but "apparently not fitted."

Thanks,

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 19)
Garland
post Sep 19 2016, 06:04 AM
Post #2


Restoration Fanatic
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,329
Joined: 8-January 04
From: ......Michigan......
Member No.: 1,535
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Paul, I've owned many early teeners over the years. I've had two cars with smooth door panels, and textured seats.

Never had a window crank fail. Beyond that, all other failures of our wonderful cars are typical but not unique to the early years. Have had many tail shifters and a couple side shift, have not noticed major concerns between the two has so many others have stated.

Unreinforced doors or later, oil bath filters can be replaced but I still use mine.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rgalla9146
post Sep 19 2016, 08:11 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,555
Joined: 23-November 05
From: Paramus NJ
Member No.: 5,176
Region Association: None



I don't know about the smooth door/textured seat issue but I can say that the vinyl upholstery in a 1971 was a one year only pattern.
Compared to other years it had a larger 'grain' (elephant hyde ?) and was very shiny.
I would gladly own a 1970 1.7
By now the remedies for early car issues are well known.
Finding a solid example is the challenge.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Sep 19 2016, 09:12 AM
Post #4


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,275
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I like the early cars. Light. Classic look. Simple. Quirky. Baby GT's.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jrblackbox
post Sep 19 2016, 10:55 AM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 285
Joined: 8-September 15
From: Easton, CT
Member No.: 19,140
Region Association: None



I love my little 71 1.7 peashooter, even though it has steelies, a fixed passenger seat and tailshifter!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SKL1
post Sep 19 2016, 02:07 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,602
Joined: 19-February 11
From: north Scottsdale
Member No.: 12,732
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Interior vinyl can be very confusing. My '71 was built in 9/70. My dad bought one about 6 months after I got mine and it was a 3/71 build, still a '71. Interior was totally different than mine...

Still love my'71 after 45 years, but admittedly it isn't a tailshifter anymore, and has OEM 914-6 running gear.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jrblackbox
post Sep 19 2016, 02:26 PM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 285
Joined: 8-September 15
From: Easton, CT
Member No.: 19,140
Region Association: None



QUOTE(SKL1 @ Sep 19 2016, 12:07 PM) *

Interior vinyl can be very confusing. My '71 was built in 9/70. My dad bought one about 6 months after I got mine and it was a 3/71 build, still a '71. Interior was totally different than mine...

Still love my'71 after 45 years, but admittedly it isn't a tailshifter anymore, and has OEM 914-6 running gear.

hmmm... my 71 was built in 9/70 as well!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
era vulgaris
post Sep 19 2016, 04:45 PM
Post #8


J is for Genius
***

Group: Members
Posts: 982
Joined: 10-November 13
From: Raleigh, NC
Member No.: 16,629
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(orthobiz @ Sep 19 2016, 07:51 AM) *

I'm looking at possibly buying an unmolested 1971 and as the owner of two 1974's, what is there to recommend the early cars? I'm thinking about the prone-to-failure window cranks, fixed passenger seat, unreinforced doors, oil bath air filter, tail shifter, central vent, etc. as potential liabilities rather than assets. Am I wrong? Gotta admit, I think steelies rule!

Also, is it possible to have textured seats with smooth vinyl door panels? Johnson's book says the textured seats were "available" but "apparently not fitted."

Thanks,

Paul


You forgot about the dash mounted windshield wiper switch!

But I don't look at all those traits as liabilities. I think they're all charming in their own way.
I've owned a big fire-breathing 914 and it was fun, but the next 914 I get will be an early 1.7. I just love the look of the steelies with hubcaps. And I'd prefer to have a car that's a bit more simplistic, and that looks a bit more classic. Now it's just a matter of finding a good one!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mark04usa
post Sep 19 2016, 08:12 PM
Post #9


'70 1.7 Tangerine
**

Group: Members
Posts: 351
Joined: 14-September 09
From: Austin TX
Member No.: 10,805
Region Association: Southwest Region



Early 914 1.7 is a simple, honest car. Fun to drive on twisty roads, and keeps up with hiway traffic no problem. My Jan '70 1.7 on this past 914 day (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris Pincetich
post Sep 19 2016, 10:11 PM
Post #10


B-)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,082
Joined: 3-October 05
From: Point Reyes Station, CA
Member No.: 4,907
Region Association: Northern California



Older is cooler (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif)
'nuff said (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Sep 20 2016, 05:20 AM
Post #11


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,275
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(mark04usa @ Sep 19 2016, 10:12 PM) *

Early 914 1.7 is a simple, honest car. Fun to drive on twisty roads, and keeps up with hiway traffic no problem. My Jan '70 1.7 on this past 914 day (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

Mine cruises at hiway speeds just fine but the acceleration is so bad that I feel like I will get run over every time traffic slows down and then speeds back up. I'm yelling for more power and the little engine is screaming she's giving me all she's got. That should all get fixed with the addition of a 3.2
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
913B
post Sep 20 2016, 08:01 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 847
Joined: 25-April 05
From: South Bay/SoCal
Member No.: 3,983
Region Association: None



No kidding my stocker 1.7 is gutless. I have to be careful passing vehicles I don't think I can pass anything on the roads today. Makes me want to get a bigger motor but don't want to deal with regrets of cooling issue. Oh well someday (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hissyfit.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
0396
post Sep 20 2016, 08:20 AM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,046
Joined: 13-October 03
From: L.A. Calif
Member No.: 1,245
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(porsche913b_sp @ Sep 20 2016, 07:01 AM) *

No kidding my stocker 1.7 is gutless. I have to be careful passing vehicles I don't think I can pass anything on the roads today. Makes me want to get a bigger motor but don't want to deal with regrets of cooling issue. Oh well someday (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hissyfit.gif)


+1 on stock 1.7 being gutless against the current state of cars on the local highways.

My .02 cents, if you want it, get it...simple
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Sep 20 2016, 08:29 AM
Post #14


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,275
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(396 @ Sep 20 2016, 10:20 AM) *

QUOTE(porsche913b_sp @ Sep 20 2016, 07:01 AM) *

No kidding my stocker 1.7 is gutless. I have to be careful passing vehicles I don't think I can pass anything on the roads today. Makes me want to get a bigger motor but don't want to deal with regrets of cooling issue. Oh well someday (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hissyfit.gif)


+1 on stock 1.7 being gutless against the current state of cars on the local highways.

My .02 cents, if you want it, get it...simple

It's fine around town. Lots of smiles per miles.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rav914
post Sep 20 2016, 10:11 AM
Post #15


All-weather fan
***

Group: Members
Posts: 738
Joined: 15-April 07
From: WA
Member No.: 7,669
Region Association: None



I loved my '70. The windshield wiper switch, smooth door panels, silver dot guages, and late model steelies were the aesthetic items I liked. It felt solid and when I put a 1911cc motor in it, it moved quickly. Would like to have another someday (-6 conversion).


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mark04usa
post Sep 20 2016, 11:37 AM
Post #16


'70 1.7 Tangerine
**

Group: Members
Posts: 351
Joined: 14-September 09
From: Austin TX
Member No.: 10,805
Region Association: Southwest Region



You folks with "gutless" 1.7's must either have a very poor running engine (likely way over carbureted) or do not know how to drive the car. My car is a stock 914, not a hot rod. It is a great car the way it is. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Garland
post Sep 20 2016, 11:51 AM
Post #17


Restoration Fanatic
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,329
Joined: 8-January 04
From: ......Michigan......
Member No.: 1,535
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(mark04usa @ Sep 20 2016, 11:37 AM) *

You folks with "gutless" 1.7's must either have a very poor running engine (likely way over carbureted) or do not know how to drive the car. My car is a stock 914, not a hot rod. It is a great car the way it is. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)




60 in the straightaway, 90 in the curves. Stock 1.7 driven well, can have some very long legs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Sep 20 2016, 12:06 PM
Post #18


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,198
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Garland @ Sep 20 2016, 10:51 AM) *

QUOTE(mark04usa @ Sep 20 2016, 11:37 AM) *

You folks with "gutless" 1.7's must either have a very poor running engine (likely way over carbureted) or do not know how to drive the car. My car is a stock 914, not a hot rod. It is a great car the way it is. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)




60 in the straightaway, 90 in the curves. Stock 1.7 driven well, can have some very long legs.



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) Well said.

With the stock injection WELL TUNED and working. It is fun.

Makes it hard for me to finish my 2056 project.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
913B
post Sep 20 2016, 12:19 PM
Post #19


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 847
Joined: 25-April 05
From: South Bay/SoCal
Member No.: 3,983
Region Association: None



QUOTE(mark04usa @ Sep 20 2016, 10:37 AM) *

You folks with "gutless" 1.7's must either have a very poor running engine (likely way over carbureted) or do not know how to drive the car. My car is a stock 914, not a hot rod. It is a great car the way it is. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)

Hmm really ? Mines is with the stock D-Jet and come to think about it. The PO had put some bigger jugs in them when it got rebuilt as I recall (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) but maybe its me driver then (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Sep 20 2016, 12:39 PM
Post #20


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,198
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(porsche913b_sp @ Sep 20 2016, 11:19 AM) *

QUOTE(mark04usa @ Sep 20 2016, 10:37 AM) *

You folks with "gutless" 1.7's must either have a very poor running engine (likely way over carbureted) or do not know how to drive the car. My car is a stock 914, not a hot rod. It is a great car the way it is. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif)

Hmm really ? Mines is with the stock D-Jet and come to think about it. The PO had put some bigger jugs in them when it got rebuilt as I recall (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) but maybe its me driver then (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)



....or with the bigger pistons the D-jet is not calibrated right.

Well tuned?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2024 - 09:57 AM