Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> HONDA B or H series motors, has anyone dropped on in?
DrifterJay
post Jun 24 2003, 02:24 AM
Post #1


I break stuff...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,034
Joined: 25-May 03
From: Oceanside, California
Member No.: 737
Region Association: None



I know I am going to get bashed, but I am curious, has anyone ever thought of dropping in a simple Honda DOHC motor like for instance a B16a1. I mean isnt that cool. I 1.6 liter capable of producing 160 hp. I dont know...There are a million reasons why to not do it..for instance its a Honda motor. U will sound like instance rice...But they are really cheap..and plentiful..yet they have no torque...I dont know...there is a very large aftermarket..Did you know that there are NA B18c5 motors running with over 230hp on standard pump gas. All while maintaining decent driveability with good gas mileage? I am sorry for blabbering. I am bored and Honda is all I really know...
Jared
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DrifterJay
post Jun 24 2003, 02:25 AM
Post #2


I break stuff...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,034
Joined: 25-May 03
From: Oceanside, California
Member No.: 737
Region Association: None



has anyone dropped one***** heheh...
Jared
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DrifterJay
post Jun 24 2003, 02:26 AM
Post #3


I break stuff...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,034
Joined: 25-May 03
From: Oceanside, California
Member No.: 737
Region Association: None



Our members have made a total of 36,914 posts
read that a min ago...
Jared
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post Jun 24 2003, 02:38 AM
Post #4


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



You really ARE bored, aren't you.

When I was 8 days away from going into the US of Army, I was shittin' green nickles. That was back in 19&68. It's better now, I hear.

Gud luck.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DrifterJay
post Jun 24 2003, 02:56 AM
Post #5


I break stuff...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,034
Joined: 25-May 03
From: Oceanside, California
Member No.: 737
Region Association: None



I need to get laid..
Jared (IMG:style_emoticons/default/chowtime.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Curvie Roadlover
post Jun 24 2003, 04:55 AM
Post #6


Two trunks are better than one!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,025
Joined: 29-December 02
From: Southeast Michigan
Member No.: 42



QUOTE(J P Stein @ Jun 24 2003, 12:38 AM)
That was back in 19&68. It's better now, I hear.


Better now? in 1968 it was as bad as it ever was!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ar15.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/vampire.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jun 24 2003, 10:35 AM
Post #7





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0



I don't see why it wouldn't work. Just need an adapter for the tranny. There is a lot of room in the engine bay in that car, so I don't see why any of them wouldn't fit. (even the H22's)
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jun 24 2003, 06:04 PM
Post #8


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,984
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



Actually, at least one version of the B16 makes 111 lb-ft of torque. That's even more than the (stock) Euro-spec 2.0 motor did! Plus it revs up quite a ways. Some of them make 170 HP, even.

Dunno how that motor would work with the stock gearing, though.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aufaber
post Jun 24 2003, 06:48 PM
Post #9


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Member No.: 525



Older Honda motors (before a year or two ago) spin the wrong way. You would have 5 reverse gears and 1 really low straight cut forward.

-Aaron G>
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jun 25 2003, 12:41 AM
Post #10





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0



Good observation. I forgot to mention that. The only engines that would drop in correctly, or atleast easier to drop in are the newer "F" series engines. They spin the correct way. Most honda engines, 2001 and older spin the other way.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DrifterJay
post Jun 25 2003, 01:10 AM
Post #11


I break stuff...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,034
Joined: 25-May 03
From: Oceanside, California
Member No.: 737
Region Association: None



do u mean the K and D series? As in the K for rsx and other models and the D17 from the civic?
Jared
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jun 25 2003, 04:50 AM
Post #12





Group:
Posts: 0
Joined: --
Member No.: 0



yeah, the K's also. The new D series engines in the civics are still spinning the wrong way, I think.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jun 25 2003, 11:26 PM
Post #13


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,984
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



Easy answer there--just use a 911 gearbox!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

But yeah, I completely forgot about the backwards rotation of most Hondas.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
madd_dogg_914
post Jun 26 2003, 02:23 AM
Post #14


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 478
Joined: 30-March 03
From: Vacaville, CA
Member No.: 497
Region Association: Northern California



I'm lost here . . . WHY are we putting a Honda motor into a PORSCHE?!?!?!?!? Porsches demand torque. Hondas deliver HP. I am a firm believer that a lot of ponies, without a lot of torque is a waste of time. Besides, there are fewer and fewer teeners out there every day. Just save up a little while and then slap a 6 in there. Once you do it you will NEVER regret it! (knock on Wood)

-Chris
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2teeners
post Jun 26 2003, 05:58 AM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Arlington DFW, TX
Member No.: 78



if I was gonna do it, and it could be done, i'd put one of the v6's in there, at least.

does anybody have a chart comparing the torque and HP of the standard 2.0 vs the flat 6's? I"ve seen Bleyseng's dyno chart, does anybody have one on the 6's?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aufaber
post Jun 26 2003, 02:04 PM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: 7-April 03
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Member No.: 525



QUOTE(madd_dogg_914 @ Jun 26 2003, 12:23 AM)
Porsches demand torque.

Well, i really wouldn't agree with that.. most porsche motors have a very short stroke for their bore. The 3.2 has what, a 95mm bore with a 75mm stroke? That isn't exaclty the recipe for ground pounding low end torque right there.

The torque they do get seems almost accidental in thier search for more HP..

928 makes torque.. so do porsches with Turbos..

Can't turbo a 914 though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

-Aaron G>
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th May 2024 - 09:02 PM