HONDA B or H series motors, has anyone dropped on in? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
HONDA B or H series motors, has anyone dropped on in? |
DrifterJay |
Jun 24 2003, 02:24 AM
Post
#1
|
I break stuff... Group: Members Posts: 1,034 Joined: 25-May 03 From: Oceanside, California Member No.: 737 Region Association: None |
I know I am going to get bashed, but I am curious, has anyone ever thought of dropping in a simple Honda DOHC motor like for instance a B16a1. I mean isnt that cool. I 1.6 liter capable of producing 160 hp. I dont know...There are a million reasons why to not do it..for instance its a Honda motor. U will sound like instance rice...But they are really cheap..and plentiful..yet they have no torque...I dont know...there is a very large aftermarket..Did you know that there are NA B18c5 motors running with over 230hp on standard pump gas. All while maintaining decent driveability with good gas mileage? I am sorry for blabbering. I am bored and Honda is all I really know...
Jared |
DrifterJay |
Jun 24 2003, 02:25 AM
Post
#2
|
I break stuff... Group: Members Posts: 1,034 Joined: 25-May 03 From: Oceanside, California Member No.: 737 Region Association: None |
has anyone dropped one***** heheh...
Jared |
DrifterJay |
Jun 24 2003, 02:26 AM
Post
#3
|
I break stuff... Group: Members Posts: 1,034 Joined: 25-May 03 From: Oceanside, California Member No.: 737 Region Association: None |
Our members have made a total of 36,914 posts
read that a min ago... Jared |
J P Stein |
Jun 24 2003, 02:38 AM
Post
#4
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
You really ARE bored, aren't you.
When I was 8 days away from going into the US of Army, I was shittin' green nickles. That was back in 19&68. It's better now, I hear. Gud luck. |
DrifterJay |
Jun 24 2003, 02:56 AM
Post
#5
|
I break stuff... Group: Members Posts: 1,034 Joined: 25-May 03 From: Oceanside, California Member No.: 737 Region Association: None |
I need to get laid..
Jared (IMG:style_emoticons/default/chowtime.gif) |
Curvie Roadlover |
Jun 24 2003, 04:55 AM
Post
#6
|
Two trunks are better than one! Group: Members Posts: 2,025 Joined: 29-December 02 From: Southeast Michigan Member No.: 42 |
QUOTE(J P Stein @ Jun 24 2003, 12:38 AM) That was back in 19&68. It's better now, I hear. Better now? in 1968 it was as bad as it ever was!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ar15.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/vampire.gif) |
Jun 24 2003, 10:35 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Group: Posts: 0 Joined: -- Member No.: 0 |
I don't see why it wouldn't work. Just need an adapter for the tranny. There is a lot of room in the engine bay in that car, so I don't see why any of them wouldn't fit. (even the H22's)
|
Dave_Darling |
Jun 24 2003, 06:04 PM
Post
#8
|
914 Idiot Group: Members Posts: 14,984 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California |
Actually, at least one version of the B16 makes 111 lb-ft of torque. That's even more than the (stock) Euro-spec 2.0 motor did! Plus it revs up quite a ways. Some of them make 170 HP, even.
Dunno how that motor would work with the stock gearing, though. --DD |
aufaber |
Jun 24 2003, 06:48 PM
Post
#9
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 190 Joined: 7-April 03 From: Huntington Beach, CA Member No.: 525 |
Older Honda motors (before a year or two ago) spin the wrong way. You would have 5 reverse gears and 1 really low straight cut forward.
-Aaron G> |
Jun 25 2003, 12:41 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Group: Posts: 0 Joined: -- Member No.: 0 |
Good observation. I forgot to mention that. The only engines that would drop in correctly, or atleast easier to drop in are the newer "F" series engines. They spin the correct way. Most honda engines, 2001 and older spin the other way.
|
DrifterJay |
Jun 25 2003, 01:10 AM
Post
#11
|
I break stuff... Group: Members Posts: 1,034 Joined: 25-May 03 From: Oceanside, California Member No.: 737 Region Association: None |
do u mean the K and D series? As in the K for rsx and other models and the D17 from the civic?
Jared |
Jun 25 2003, 04:50 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Group: Posts: 0 Joined: -- Member No.: 0 |
yeah, the K's also. The new D series engines in the civics are still spinning the wrong way, I think.
|
Dave_Darling |
Jun 25 2003, 11:26 PM
Post
#13
|
914 Idiot Group: Members Posts: 14,984 Joined: 9-January 03 From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona Member No.: 121 Region Association: Northern California |
Easy answer there--just use a 911 gearbox!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
But yeah, I completely forgot about the backwards rotation of most Hondas. --DD |
madd_dogg_914 |
Jun 26 2003, 02:23 AM
Post
#14
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 478 Joined: 30-March 03 From: Vacaville, CA Member No.: 497 Region Association: Northern California |
I'm lost here . . . WHY are we putting a Honda motor into a PORSCHE?!?!?!?!? Porsches demand torque. Hondas deliver HP. I am a firm believer that a lot of ponies, without a lot of torque is a waste of time. Besides, there are fewer and fewer teeners out there every day. Just save up a little while and then slap a 6 in there. Once you do it you will NEVER regret it! (knock on Wood)
-Chris |
2teeners |
Jun 26 2003, 05:58 AM
Post
#15
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 79 Joined: 2-January 03 From: Arlington DFW, TX Member No.: 78 |
if I was gonna do it, and it could be done, i'd put one of the v6's in there, at least.
does anybody have a chart comparing the torque and HP of the standard 2.0 vs the flat 6's? I"ve seen Bleyseng's dyno chart, does anybody have one on the 6's? |
aufaber |
Jun 26 2003, 02:04 PM
Post
#16
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 190 Joined: 7-April 03 From: Huntington Beach, CA Member No.: 525 |
QUOTE(madd_dogg_914 @ Jun 26 2003, 12:23 AM) Porsches demand torque. Well, i really wouldn't agree with that.. most porsche motors have a very short stroke for their bore. The 3.2 has what, a 95mm bore with a 75mm stroke? That isn't exaclty the recipe for ground pounding low end torque right there. The torque they do get seems almost accidental in thier search for more HP.. 928 makes torque.. so do porsches with Turbos.. Can't turbo a 914 though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) -Aaron G> |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th May 2024 - 09:02 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |