Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Drive by wire, getting rid of another cable, Electronic pedal, not a wa wa
Gunn1
post Nov 24 2016, 10:41 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,021
Joined: 14-February 16
From: Minnesota
Member No.: 19,670
Region Association: None



Anyone have a drive by wire set up on their 914? Looking for a cable-less solution to throttle control. Would be for a stock 75' 914 2.0liter. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jim_hoyland
post Nov 24 2016, 10:49 AM
Post #2


Get that VIN ?
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,298
Joined: 1-May 03
From: Sunset Beach, CA
Member No.: 643
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Gunn1 @ Nov 24 2016, 08:41 AM) *

Anyone have a drive by wire set up on their 914? Looking for a cable-less solution to throttle control. Would be for a stock 75' 914 2.0liter. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)


That would be BIG ! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bandjoey
post Nov 24 2016, 10:53 AM
Post #3


bandjoey
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,926
Joined: 26-September 07
From: Bedford Tx
Member No.: 8,156
Region Association: Southwest Region



Sounds like get rid of 1 cable to add 30 electric wires a computer and an electric server motor.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gunn1
post Nov 24 2016, 10:59 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,021
Joined: 14-February 16
From: Minnesota
Member No.: 19,670
Region Association: None



QUOTE(bandjoey @ Nov 24 2016, 10:53 AM) *

Sounds like get rid of 1 cable to add 30 electric wires a computer and an electric server motor.


No, don't think so. pedal with a transmitter and power supply, and a actuator motor with receiver mounted on the TPS with a power supply. Think the complexity is in the electronics. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bandjoey
post Nov 24 2016, 11:28 AM
Post #5


bandjoey
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,926
Joined: 26-September 07
From: Bedford Tx
Member No.: 8,156
Region Association: Southwest Region



Bring it on. This could be your claim to fame. Will b watching this. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Nov 24 2016, 11:29 AM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



This would be low complexity.

One arduino module (about $10, the size of a postage stamp) one variable resistance throttle pedal (Guido Simplex sells these) or a PWM model from modern car would work too, and one servo motor.

The arduino would read the potentiometer (resistance) via an analog channel (or the PWM signal via digital channel).
It would then drive one of it's outputs with another PWM signal to the servo motor.

The servo motor only requires power in and the PWM signal to command a position.

There would be a tiny amount of code in the arduino to "smooth" the signal but it would be trivial.

You just want to find a servo that has no problem driving the throttle input

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris914n6
post Nov 24 2016, 12:11 PM
Post #7


Jackstands are my life.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,320
Joined: 14-March 03
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 431
Region Association: Southwest Region



I've done the opposite on a 350z motor. What do you hope to gain?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gunn1
post Nov 24 2016, 12:20 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,021
Joined: 14-February 16
From: Minnesota
Member No.: 19,670
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Chris914n6 @ Nov 24 2016, 12:11 PM) *

I've done the opposite on a 350z motor. What do you hope to gain?


Cable tube in tunnel is in bad shape, replacement and or proper rerouting of new cable. Just saw it as a possible modern solution to take care of a old problem.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Nov 24 2016, 12:43 PM
Post #9


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(stugray @ Nov 24 2016, 09:29 AM) *

This would be low complexity.

One arduino module (about $10, the size of a postage stamp) one variable resistance throttle pedal (Guido Simplex sells these) or a PWM model from modern car would work too, and one servo motor.

The arduino would read the potentiometer (resistance) via an analog channel (or the PWM signal via digital channel).
It would then drive one of it's outputs with another PWM signal to the servo motor.

The servo motor only requires power in and the PWM signal to command a position.

There would be a tiny amount of code in the arduino to "smooth" the signal but it would be trivial.

You just want to find a servo that has no problem driving the throttle input



The 2 Audi gurus that have done this conversion to their 914s would know best, but I am pretty sure the pedal has 2 pots, one +5vdc and one -5vdc or something like that, redundancy in case something goes wrong.

This is one of those projects that if you cannot figure out on your own you shouldn't be doing it, other peoples lives are at stake.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rand
post Nov 24 2016, 01:23 PM
Post #10


Cross Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,409
Joined: 8-February 05
From: OR
Member No.: 3,573
Region Association: None



Don't feed the troll
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elliot Cannon
post Nov 24 2016, 01:27 PM
Post #11


914 Guru
*****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 8,487
Joined: 29-December 06
From: Paso Robles Ca. (Central coast)
Member No.: 7,407
Region Association: None



I'm a big believer in keeping things simple but I encourage people to do things like this. Sounds like a good project. However if you start something like this keep us all posted on the results.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Nov 24 2016, 01:32 PM
Post #12


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,588
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(bandjoey @ Nov 24 2016, 02:28 PM) *

Bring it on. This could be your claim to fame. Will b watching this. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smash.gif)


Oh come on. He already has a claim to fame. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stirthepot.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mikey914
post Nov 24 2016, 01:41 PM
Post #13


The rubber man
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,668
Joined: 27-December 04
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 3,348
Region Association: None



Sometimes best to keep it simple. Remember aircraft now use this feature in most production today. But , hundreds of millions of dollars went into design, and here's the real key .........Redunancy!

If you get into an accident and there's any possibility this apparatus could even be thought to have been involved, your hosed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gunn1
post Nov 24 2016, 02:57 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,021
Joined: 14-February 16
From: Minnesota
Member No.: 19,670
Region Association: None



Your probably right, must likely the reason there is not a plug and play kit available. I'm not a liability attorney, but couldn't the same be said for some non factory modifications that potentially caused the accident.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Elliot Cannon
post Nov 24 2016, 03:19 PM
Post #15


914 Guru
*****

Group: Retired Members
Posts: 8,487
Joined: 29-December 06
From: Paso Robles Ca. (Central coast)
Member No.: 7,407
Region Association: None



"Open the pod bay doors please HAL". "I'm sorry Dave". (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Nov 24 2016, 04:21 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



I knew a brilliant guy at work that would say "you cant TRUST those new-fangled PLCs!" (Programmable Logic Controllers).

I said "Then I guess you never go near factories or power plants or ride on elevators huh?"
I just got a blank stare.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris914n6
post Nov 24 2016, 04:45 PM
Post #17


Jackstands are my life.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,320
Joined: 14-March 03
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 431
Region Association: Southwest Region



I think the tube is just brazed on at the firewall. There is a pic of a cut out tunnel floating around somewhere that would help.

For some good reading... Nissan FSM. Any of the 350z would be a good choice as they have specs. 0-5v and a redundant sender on the pedal. Wires to the ECU so off hand I don't think one will control the other without a translator (ECU).
eGas is a Bosch tech so most, if not all, of it should be compatible.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Nov 24 2016, 05:59 PM
Post #18


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Gunn1 @ Nov 24 2016, 12:57 PM) *

Your probably right, must likely the reason there is not a plug and play kit available. I'm not a liability attorney, but couldn't the same be said for some non factory modifications that potentially caused the accident.



https://m.summitracing.com/parts/lok-xdbw-6...kxbEaAtAp8P8HAQ


Plus you need another module that cost $300+ .... see tab for other parts

So yes it can be done with properly engineered parts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Nov 24 2016, 06:22 PM
Post #19


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,824
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



The project for a variable resistor type pedal is one of the most basic tutorials for an arduino:
https://www.arduino.cc/en/Tutorial/Knob
and is literally 10 lines of code

If you used the other type of gas pedal (PWM) & I had to read the PWM signal, it would be slightly more complicated as I would need to use one of the digital inputs to determine the pulse width from the pedal
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd74914
post Nov 24 2016, 06:48 PM
Post #20


Its alive
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,780
Joined: 16-February 04
From: CT
Member No.: 1,659
Region Association: North East States



This is one of those questions where if you have to ask you really shouldn't be doing it...

The difference between an arduino and PLC is the hardened electronics. The coding is trivial, but I would really not trust the reliability of an ardiuno in a life or death application.

My car is going to DBW with an aftermarket engine controller, but using oem components like BarryM used for his car wouldn't be too hard.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 11:42 AM