Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Mega squirt vs micro squirt educate me
mb911
post Dec 10 2016, 05:31 PM
Post #1


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,848
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



So I am building a 2.4 6 with s pistons, solex cams and ported heads. I have webers and have considered a couple of paths. I have used megasquirt in the past on a 3.2 short stroke turbo engine using an adaptation of the bitz racing kit..

I am considering many things from machining the intakes to accept injectors and using the webers as throttle bodies to making a all sheet metal intake..

I would really like use a ecu that has a usb port etc. I am looking for feed back ..

Utlimatly the system I used before was bullet proof.. Thoughts?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mowog4
post Dec 10 2016, 05:48 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 288
Joined: 2-November 15
From: Mesa AZ
Member No.: 19,325
Region Association: None



I am running a MegaSquirt Pro, https://www.diyautotune.com/product/ms3-pro...alone-ecu-only/, in my Bugeye Sprite with a rotary 13B, normally aspirated. It was slight overkill, I could have used their less expensive units but I figured who knows what stupidity the future will bring. I am running a Jenvey (DCOE) throttle body, with a steel manifold, https://foxinjection.com/collections/jenvey...ody-48mm-single. It has been a great system, was done in a weekend, grabbed an intro fuel map from the web and a dyno tuner had it running great in a few hours. It has been a good system.
Ed
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Dec 10 2016, 06:19 PM
Post #3


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,583
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(mb911 @ Dec 10 2016, 08:31 PM) *

So I am building a 2.4 6 with s pistons, solex cams and ported heads. I have webers and have considered a couple of paths. I have used megasquirt in the past on a 3.2 short stroke turbo engine using an adaptation of the bitz racing kit..

I am considering many things from machining the intakes to accept injectors and using the webers as throttle bodies to making a all sheet metal intake..

I would really like use a ecu that has a usb port etc. I am looking for feed back ..

Utlimatly the system I used before was bullet proof.. Thoughts?


Jenvey TB's? Save the Webers...


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Dec 10 2016, 06:22 PM
Post #4


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



This looks interesting.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911...ty-project.html

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jmill
post Dec 10 2016, 07:39 PM
Post #5


Green Hornet
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,449
Joined: 9-May 08
From: Racine, Wisconsin
Member No.: 9,038
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Travis Neff @ Dec 10 2016, 06:22 PM) *


Wow! Now I need to save up more money for this setup. $500 for the manifolds and you're on your way.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 10 2016, 08:57 PM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Microsquirt is not a good fit for a six because its only got two injector drivers. You could batch fire three cylinders on each driver, and it would work fine, but I would run MegaSquirt on a six.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914forme
post Dec 11 2016, 05:57 AM
Post #7


Times a wastin', get wrenchin'!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,896
Joined: 24-July 04
From: Dayton, Ohio
Member No.: 2,388
Region Association: None



Been considering the same thing.

I will go SDS as I have it, but MegaSquirt Pro would have been my next choice. The TBs are the big piece for me also. I have been thinking PMO as they would look stealth, but then the engine would not look stock anyway with a big coil pack hanging around.

But as I have a set of triple speeds laying around, a set of manifolds, and it looks like I am well on my way.

Now to rig up the ignition and fuel timing into the flywheel.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Dec 11 2016, 07:25 AM
Post #8


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,848
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 10 2016, 06:57 PM) *

Microsquirt is not a good fit for a six because its only got two injector drivers. You could batch fire three cylinders on each driver, and it would work fine, but I would run MegaSquirt on a six.



That's exactly what I was wondering.

I am really just thinking about down the road.. I like the idea of just custom manifolds and using webers as the throttle bodies then it looks pretty cool..



On the sheet metal intake any thoughts on this?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gereed75
post Dec 11 2016, 08:26 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,246
Joined: 19-March 13
From: Pittsburgh PA
Member No.: 15,674
Region Association: North East States



Consider using MFI throttle bodies and stacks. They can be had fairly cheaply if you shop around and are patient - typically about half of what Jenevy or PMO or others go for

Use MFI heads. The injector ports are already there. Then use megasquirt or any other system of choice

Jaimie Novak sells parts for these MFI conversions at classicautowerks.com. Posts as Jpnovak on pelican.

Achieves the goal and keeps the classic look.


User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Dec 11 2016, 08:59 AM
Post #10


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,262
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(gereed75 @ Dec 11 2016, 09:26 AM) *

Consider using MFI throttle bodies and stacks. They can be had fairly cheaply if you shop around and are patient - typically about half of what Jenevy or PMO or others go for

Use MFI heads. The injector ports are already there. Then use megasquirt or any other system of choice

Jaimie Novak sells parts for these MFI conversions at classicautowerks.com. Posts as Jpnovak on pelican.

Achieves the goal and keeps the classic look.

I probably have 2.4 mfi or cis heads. I have T stacks. Not sure if I have any throttle bodies left. Maybe.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jpnovak
post Dec 11 2016, 08:59 AM
Post #11


They call me "Nanoman"
**

Group: Members
Posts: 231
Joined: 26-August 09
From: Austin TX
Member No.: 10,736
Region Association: Southwest Region



Thanks for the vote of confidence. Let me add a few more details on my system.

I have been running Microsquirt units on a few recent installs. I like them because they are small enough to fit inside the tunnel access by the shift coupler for a near-hidden install. I run integrated spark and fuel. The microsquirt has fewer I/O ports but these are seldom needed on a NA engine.

I do run 2 banks and alternating batch fire. Saw a significant increase in mid-range torque on a recent hot-rod 3.0 when switching from webers to TWM/EFI.

I am a big fan of EFI and maintaining vintage aesthetics. What 2.4 heads do you have? If MFI heads I can supply adapters and screw into the MFI injection ports and hold injectors. I use BMW application Seimens Deka injectors that have the long tip. The tip is located right at the edge of the intake port wall. Exact position depends on port size.

If you have the 73.5 CIS 2.4 heads EFI injector will press it into the exisiting injector port. No adapters needed.

Both of the above are designed to be used with the factory MFI stacks and TBs. This retains the stock linkage and airbox.

I also modify the stock crank pulley for flying magnets and use a discrete hall effect pickup sensor. This give a crank angle pickup signal for timing control. I retain the stock distributor but it is only used for rotor phasing and spark distribution. Basically I take out the least-reliable parts in a distributor: mechanical advance and points.

There are many ways to accomplish what you are after. I agree that EFI is the way to go. What parts do you have? This can steer the decision making process and allowed budget.

Regarding cams... Have you purchased? If you are considering EFI then there are some choices to be made regarding the exact cam specs. What works well for carbs/MFI (98-102 deg lobe center) does not work as well with EFI (I prefer a 106-110 lobe center). This will broaden and flatten the torque curve with the trade off of slightly less peak torque. The overall gains in area under the curve make up for the difference. Small changes really wake these engines up.

btw, I do not want this to be a sales pitch. My adapters work where appropriate. I will not try to steer you into something that will just lead to frustration because its not a good fit for the application.

There are also many good options for ECUs. Since you are familiar with the Megasquirt line you can continue. Otherwise, pick a system that your tuner is familiar with. Nothing worse than EFI with bad programming/tuning.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Dec 11 2016, 10:42 AM
Post #12


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,848
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(jpnovak @ Dec 11 2016, 06:59 AM) *

Thanks for the vote of confidence. Let me add a few more details on my system.

I have been running Microsquirt units on a few recent installs. I like them because they are small enough to fit inside the tunnel access by the shift coupler for a near-hidden install. I run integrated spark and fuel. The microsquirt has fewer I/O ports but these are seldom needed on a NA engine.

I do run 2 banks and alternating batch fire. Saw a significant increase in mid-range torque on a recent hot-rod 3.0 when switching from webers to TWM/EFI.

I am a big fan of EFI and maintaining vintage aesthetics. What 2.4 heads do you have? If MFI heads I can supply adapters and screw into the MFI injection ports and hold injectors. I use BMW application Seimens Deka injectors that have the long tip. The tip is located right at the edge of the intake port wall. Exact position depends on port size.

If you have the 73.5 CIS 2.4 heads EFI injector will press it into the exisiting injector port. No adapters needed.

Both of the above are designed to be used with the factory MFI stacks and TBs. This retains the stock linkage and airbox.

I also modify the stock crank pulley for flying magnets and use a discrete hall effect pickup sensor. This give a crank angle pickup signal for timing control. I retain the stock distributor but it is only used for rotor phasing and spark distribution. Basically I take out the least-reliable parts in a distributor: mechanical advance and points.

There are many ways to accomplish what you are after. I agree that EFI is the way to go. What parts do you have? This can steer the decision making process and allowed budget.

Regarding cams... Have you purchased? If you are considering EFI then there are some choices to be made regarding the exact cam specs. What works well for carbs/MFI (98-102 deg lobe center) does not work as well with EFI (I prefer a 106-110 lobe center). This will broaden and flatten the torque curve with the trade off of slightly less peak torque. The overall gains in area under the curve make up for the difference. Small changes really wake these engines up.

btw, I do not want this to be a sales pitch. My adapters work where appropriate. I will not try to steer you into something that will just lead to frustration because its not a good fit for the application.

There are also many good options for ECUs. Since you are familiar with the Megasquirt line you can continue. Otherwise, pick a system that your tuner is familiar with. Nothing worse than EFI with bad programming/tuning.



Hi Jamie. Thanks for the responses.. To be honest probably just going to run carbs for now and maybe machine some intakes at work as a pet project.. I have mfi heads that supertec is working on now. I will call and talk with henryt Tuesday about options..

Mark I don't mfi stuff yet lol but you never know. More interested in left hand side key conversion (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Dec 11 2016, 10:53 AM
Post #13


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,583
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(914forme @ Dec 11 2016, 08:57 AM) *

Been considering the same thing.

I will go SDS as I have it, but MegaSquirt Pro would have been my next choice. The TBs are the big piece for me also. I have been thinking PMO as they would look stealth, but then the engine would not look stock anyway with a big coil pack hanging around.

But as I have a set of triple speeds laying around, a set of manifolds, and it looks like I am well on my way.

Now to rig up the ignition and fuel timing into the flywheel.


Steven, having used SDS for a couple years, my concern is with the first S in SDS. Compared to either Mega or Micro, it's just too simple. It's lack of sophistication, especially in the tuning interface left me struggling to get things just right. When you do something like this, you are wanting it just right. Otherwise bolt up carbs and go!


The prices between the systems are comparable. So, why?

McMark was very patient with me but I think he would have rather done any other system.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Dec 12 2016, 01:05 AM
Post #14


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(ConeDodger @ Dec 11 2016, 11:53 AM) *

QUOTE(914forme @ Dec 11 2016, 08:57 AM) *

Been considering the same thing.

I will go SDS as I have it, but MegaSquirt Pro would have been my next choice. The TBs are the big piece for me also. I have been thinking PMO as they would look stealth, but then the engine would not look stock anyway with a big coil pack hanging around.

But as I have a set of triple speeds laying around, a set of manifolds, and it looks like I am well on my way.

Now to rig up the ignition and fuel timing into the flywheel.


Steven, having used SDS for a couple years, my concern is with the first S in SDS. Compared to either Mega or Micro, it's just too simple. It's lack of sophistication, especially in the tuning interface left me struggling to get things just right. When you do something like this, you are wanting it just right. Otherwise bolt up carbs and go!


The prices between the systems are comparable. So, why?

McMark was very patient with me but I think he would have rather done any other system.


He says because he already has the system....

BTW on your SDS, let me guess, it always went lean if you kicked down WOT... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 12 2016, 09:00 AM
Post #15


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Mark Henry @ Dec 12 2016, 02:05 AM) *

QUOTE(ConeDodger @ Dec 11 2016, 11:53 AM) *

QUOTE(914forme @ Dec 11 2016, 08:57 AM) *

Been considering the same thing.

I will go SDS as I have it, but MegaSquirt Pro would have been my next choice. The TBs are the big piece for me also. I have been thinking PMO as they would look stealth, but then the engine would not look stock anyway with a big coil pack hanging around.

But as I have a set of triple speeds laying around, a set of manifolds, and it looks like I am well on my way.

Now to rig up the ignition and fuel timing into the flywheel.


Steven, having used SDS for a couple years, my concern is with the first S in SDS. Compared to either Mega or Micro, it's just too simple. It's lack of sophistication, especially in the tuning interface left me struggling to get things just right. When you do something like this, you are wanting it just right. Otherwise bolt up carbs and go!


The prices between the systems are comparable. So, why?

McMark was very patient with me but I think he would have rather done any other system.


He says because he already has the system....

BTW on your SDS, let me guess, it always went lean if you kicked down WOT... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)

It was mostly just the feverish masturbation of buttons trying to navigate to the correct 'bin' that needed adjustment. Oh and the 4-up view of engine readings instead of the Tuner Studio dash were everything is in one place. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

My standard caveat applies: SDS works, some people love it, I know it works. It just doesn't fit my needs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914forme
post Dec 12 2016, 09:34 AM
Post #16


Times a wastin', get wrenchin'!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,896
Joined: 24-July 04
From: Dayton, Ohio
Member No.: 2,388
Region Association: None



Yes have the SDS, actually several different EFI units. And have always wanted to install one. On my EG build I will be changing to MS3 Pro, just to much good stuff like E85 sensor not to go that direction. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Dec 12 2016, 10:39 AM
Post #17


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(914forme @ Dec 12 2016, 07:34 AM) *

Yes have the SDS, actually several different EFI units. And have always wanted to install one. On my EG build I will be changing to MS3 Pro, just to much good stuff like E85 sensor not to go that direction. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)



That is an excellent reason to go pro (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Dec 12 2016, 10:47 AM
Post #18


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(McMark @ Dec 12 2016, 10:00 AM) *


My standard caveat applies: SDS works, some people love it, I know it works. It just doesn't fit my needs.

Yep, I hear you...not for everyone. Even my next system will likely be MS.

As for SDS, you do know the new systems have changed a bit.
It still has a pendant, but it's now fully programmable via laptop with datalogging, etc.

If anyone wants an SDS /6, crankfire twin plug system, I have a line on one for a good price.
Includes everything, trigger wheel, sensor mount, two coil packs (twin plug) I believe the plug wire sets, a 1 bar and 2 bar MPS.
Used one season, no issues, bought new in 2014.

Was on a 930 turbo making 450hp at the wheels, no idea why the dude wants to change, runs perfect to me and he's not going to gain anything.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Dec 12 2016, 11:33 AM
Post #19


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Didn't realize. I'll take a look at it again to update my brain. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Jan 7 2017, 07:07 PM
Post #20


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,848
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Just an update on this thread as my heads are back along with pistons and cylinders.. I have decided to stay carbs for a bit but I have the mfi ports in the heads for Jamie's adapters for fuel injectors.Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12th May 2024 - 08:41 PM