Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1972 2.0 vs. 1974 2.0, Differences
914_7T3
post Apr 7 2017, 02:14 PM
Post #1


Please forgive me, I'm new to all of this!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,853
Joined: 3-April 17
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 20,991
Region Association: Southern California



Other than the transmission, what are the differences in the these two model years. I also now have a 1972 under consideration for restoration. Not concourse quality, but an excellent driver quality car is the plan.

If at the end of the day the cost to acquire and restore the 1974 is $5k-10K greater, will it be worth it in the end?

i.e. $20k-$25K to acquire and build the '74 versus $15k-$20k for the 1972.

Would love to get your thoughts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
arne
post Apr 7 2017, 02:20 PM
Post #2


Serial Rescuer of old vehicles...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 738
Joined: 31-January 17
From: Eugene, Oregon
Member No.: 20,799
Region Association: None



There was no factory 2.0 in '72. (Well, the /6'was 2.0, but I doubt that's what you are looking at.) All four cylinder '72s were originally 1.7.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_7T3
post Apr 7 2017, 02:25 PM
Post #3


Please forgive me, I'm new to all of this!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,853
Joined: 3-April 17
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 20,991
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(arne @ Apr 7 2017, 01:20 PM) *

There was no factory 2.0 in '72. (Well, the /6'was 2.0, but I doubt that's what you are looking at.) All four cylinder '72s were originally 1.7.



So more than likely, the seller has no clue & neither do I (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Apr 7 2017, 02:33 PM
Post #4


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,271
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



'73 was the first year for the side shift trans and has been said, the 2.0. Lots of other small changes but those 2 things made a difference. I think it's worth a $5K difference, maybe more. If your dream is a 6, then it doesn't matter since you will change everything anyway.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Apr 7 2017, 02:38 PM
Post #5


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,197
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Calvinator2016 @ Apr 7 2017, 01:25 PM) *

QUOTE(arne @ Apr 7 2017, 01:20 PM) *

There was no factory 2.0 in '72. (Well, the /6'was 2.0, but I doubt that's what you are looking at.) All four cylinder '72s were originally 1.7.



So more than likely, the seller has no clue & neither do I (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)



...so for 20K you might want to get one.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom_T
post Apr 7 2017, 02:44 PM
Post #6


TMI....
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,318
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Orange, CA
Member No.: 10,181
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Calvinator2016 @ Apr 7 2017, 01:25 PM) *

QUOTE(arne @ Apr 7 2017, 01:20 PM) *

There was no factory 2.0 in '72. (Well, the /6'was 2.0, but I doubt that's what you are looking at.) All four cylinder '72s were originally 1.7.



So more than likely, the seller has no clue & neither do I (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)


The factory 2.0's for 73-74 MY do sell for more, & then the 75-76 2.0s just behind & a 74 2.0 LE/CanAm will be a bit more.

Use Hagerty to see where the prices now & post-resto would be using the chart of historical values down the page (use value another car to do others):

1972 1.7 -
https://www.hagerty.com/apps/valuationtools...!4?id=97330

1974 2.0 -
https://www.hagerty.com/apps/valuationtools...Porsche-914-2.0

You can see from the above that the values are pretty flat & stable lately.

For non-factory 2L - either 72 or 74 which is a converted to 2.0 /4 will be about the same I think, so pick the best condition.

Spend some time reading up on 914s to avoid the Newb mistakes, at the 914 Info section at the top of this site, plus at:

p914.com (& .org & .net)

http://bowlsby.net/914/Classic/

http://bowlsby.net/914/CanAm/

& use Jeff's form to inspect anything:
http://bowlsby.net/914/Classic/zTN_Gen_914CAF.pdf

Good Luck! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Tom
///////
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
injunmort
post Apr 7 2017, 03:02 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,024
Joined: 12-April 10
From: sugarloaf ny
Member No.: 11,604
Region Association: North East States



the best one is the one that has the least rust. it will be the cheapest to restore. neither will likely be worth what you have into it, unless an LE or a /6. mho
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GeorgeRud
post Apr 7 2017, 03:24 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,725
Joined: 27-July 05
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 4,482
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Basically the '73 and '74 914 2.0 were the same though most of the goodies that were standard on the '73 (alloy wheels, sway bars) were optional in '74.

I'd agree, buy on condition!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JawjaPorsche
post Apr 7 2017, 03:54 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,463
Joined: 23-July 11
From: Clayton, Georgia
Member No.: 13,351
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(GeorgeRud @ Apr 7 2017, 05:24 PM) *

Basically the '73 and '74 914 2.0 were the same though most of the goodies that were standard on the '73 (alloy wheels, sway bars) were optional in '74.

I'd agree, buy on condition!



I agree. The 74's started to cut quality. Less chrome or bling! Even on the gauges!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Apr 7 2017, 05:13 PM
Post #10


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,986
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



The 72 would have the early style window regulators. They are more problematic than the later scissor-lift style.

The 72 will not have the reinforcements inside the doors that the 74 does.

The 72 will not have bumper tits; the 74 will have them F&R.

The 72 might have body-colored bumpers or chrome, the 74 would have either black or chrome.

The 72 may have fixed seat belts, or may have the inertia-reel type. The 74 will have inertia-reel belts.

The 72 will have a 1.7 or a non-original engine. The 74 would have either a 1.8 or a 2.0 (or a non-original engine).

The 72 will have the tail-shift transmission. The 74 will have the side-shifter.

The 72 will have silver-dot gauges. The 74 will have black-dot gauges, unless it is an early 74 that was using up the last of the silver-dot gauges.

The 72 will have separate left and right turn signal indicators in the tach. The 74 will have just one for both--or if it has the early gauges, it will have both hooked up so they blink at the same time.

Some of the optional equipment was different. Some of the materials (e.g., seat material pattern, etc.) were different. Different body and interior options were available.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_7T3
post Apr 8 2017, 01:51 PM
Post #11


Please forgive me, I'm new to all of this!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,853
Joined: 3-April 17
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 20,991
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Dave_Darling @ Apr 7 2017, 04:13 PM) *

The 72 would have the early style window regulators. They are more problematic than the later scissor-lift style.

The 72 will not have the reinforcements inside the doors that the 74 does.

The 72 will not have bumper tits; the 74 will have them F&R.

The 72 might have body-colored bumpers or chrome, the 74 would have either black or chrome.

The 72 may have fixed seat belts, or may have the inertia-reel type. The 74 will have inertia-reel belts.

The 72 will have a 1.7 or a non-original engine. The 74 would have either a 1.8 or a 2.0 (or a non-original engine).

The 72 will have the tail-shift transmission. The 74 will have the side-shifter.

The 72 will have silver-dot gauges. The 74 will have black-dot gauges, unless it is an early 74 that was using up the last of the silver-dot gauges.

The 72 will have separate left and right turn signal indicators in the tach. The 74 will have just one for both--or if it has the early gauges, it will have both hooked up so they blink at the same time.

Some of the optional equipment was different. Some of the materials (e.g., seat material pattern, etc.) were different. Different body and interior options were available.

--DD


Thanks Dave, this info is extremely helpful. As a newbie, I took the Pelican Parts buying guide, serial # locator and tech data sheet to see the car under consideration earlier today that was advertised as a 72.

Good news, Bad news.

Good News is that the car was actually a 73 2.0 as per the 47329......Vin #.

Bad news is that it was only 3/4 numbers matching and had serious rust issues. Had to walk away.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Apr 8 2017, 02:21 PM
Post #12


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,271
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



The numbers matching thing means very little to me.
The rust issues are another story.
Good move.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th May 2024 - 05:08 AM