New Bare 039 Heads Available $279, AA Performace Products-In California |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
New Bare 039 Heads Available $279, AA Performace Products-In California |
brownaar |
May 25 2017, 06:44 PM
Post
#41
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 263 Joined: 23-September 04 From: Gate City, VA Member No.: 2,813 Region Association: None |
Any new progress/updates on this?
|
Robnxious |
May 25 2017, 09:17 PM
Post
#42
|
RobnxiousOne Group: Members Posts: 184 Joined: 26-October 06 From: Sacramento Member No.: 7,097 Region Association: Northern California |
Agreed thanks Len! and a question.. Ive been debating buying a set of AMC heads and engaging in some serious machine work to mod them to 2L spec and twin plug for my 2366 Mtr build w/Nikkies. Do you think these would be acceptable options while perhaps saving me some scratch? Verdicts still out on these castings. They make a good first impression, but at this point I need to work a pair. They clearly aren't as beefy as the amc's. The amc's are very good castings that have proven durable on a lot of very high output large displacement engines over the past 15 years. We'll see. Like I said, once I machine a pair I'll know a lot more. I would LOVE it if I didn't have to weld heads to move the spark plugs anymore. I still do all of the welding and peening personally and it takes it's toll physically. Not to mention the time. Well I for one want to thank you for personally doing the welding and peening on your heads, since my set just arrived for my build today. Can't wait to drive them and see what all the fuss is about! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif) |
HAM Inc |
May 26 2017, 04:10 PM
Post
#43
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 846 Joined: 24-July 06 From: Watkinsville,GA Member No.: 6,499 Region Association: None |
Agreed thanks Len! and a question.. Ive been debating buying a set of AMC heads and engaging in some serious machine work to mod them to 2L spec and twin plug for my 2366 Mtr build w/Nikkies. Do you think these would be acceptable options while perhaps saving me some scratch? Verdicts still out on these castings. They make a good first impression, but at this point I need to work a pair. They clearly aren't as beefy as the amc's. The amc's are very good castings that have proven durable on a lot of very high output large displacement engines over the past 15 years. We'll see. Like I said, once I machine a pair I'll know a lot more. I would LOVE it if I didn't have to weld heads to move the spark plugs anymore. I still do all of the welding and peening personally and it takes it's toll physically. Not to mention the time. Well I for one want to thank you for personally doing the welding and peening on your heads, since my set just arrived for my build today. Can't wait to drive them and see what all the fuss is about! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/drooley.gif) Thanks for purchasing a pair of my heads! Lot of time and effort goes into them. Hope you're satisfied with the performance. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif) As for the knockoff heads, I've just finished a pair. They machined well and critical deminsions are a match, for the most part. The pushrod tube bores are a couple of thousanths small, which is good since the machine work to them is rough as a cob and require honing to smooth them out so they don't tear o-rings. The flycut finish is okay, but the work from chamber to chamber varied by a couple of thousanths. Our finish work is with .0005" The intake ports are awful as delivered. Rough as cobs (and I like rough, but this was a bit much) and don't line up at all with a factory gasket. But that wasn't a big deal for me as they do have the same corkscrew shape, and are undersized such that with port work they lined up fine and flowed the same as our ported heads. The exhaust ports are pretty much dead nuts copies of the O.E. heads in rough shape and after polishing and blending flow about the same as an untouched stock port, which is good when comparing to other O.E. T4 heads (1.7&1.8) but bad when comparing to what we get out of our AMC heads, which have tiny ports as delivered from AMC and lots of meat around the outside of the port that allows us to carve a far superior shape that we've developed over the years. There's not much that can be done to improve the knockoff ports as they are bulged out where it doesn't help and don't have meat enough to port where it does help. As for the machining characteristics of the heads I ran them on the cnc at the same feeds and speeds with the same tooling as we use on AMC heads. The chips and machined surfaces were identical in appearance to the AMC heads and the machined dimensions were with .0002" of what we get with the AMC's. That tells me that they at least have similar machinibility, which is encouraging regarding alloy characteristics, but hardly conclusive in predicting durability. Because they are lightweight castings of an unknown alloy I am sending this pair off for thermal coatings. After which they will go on a 2270 being built by a freind of mine and Jake's for some serious road use. Not screaming high revver, which would actually be less challenging, but in a 412 that is going to be lugged to the ends of the earth, something aircooled heads hate! My verdict is still out on these castings as far as durability goes. My hunch is that they are going to do at least as well as a 40Y.O. casting that's been run through the ringer. That said, I'm willing to build them out with quality parts if people are interested, but I'm not willing to put any[i] warranty on them beyond my workmanship. |
Krieger |
May 26 2017, 04:21 PM
Post
#44
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,693 Joined: 24-May 04 From: Santa Rosa CA Member No.: 2,104 Region Association: None |
Thanks for your analysis Len! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif)
|
914Sixer |
May 26 2017, 08:25 PM
Post
#45
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 8,863 Joined: 17-January 05 From: San Angelo Texas Member No.: 3,457 Region Association: Southwest Region |
Len's verdict is good to hear. He mentioned in earlier posts that his source at AA said that they would be reinforcing the molds in the rights places so all in all this COULD BE a win win situation.
|
Mueller |
Jun 15 2017, 12:22 PM
Post
#46
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
Len's verdict is good to hear. He mentioned in earlier posts that his source at AA said that they would be reinforcing the molds in the rights places so all in all this COULD BE a win win situation. I read on shoptalk that this 1st batch sold out already. It would be great if they could add material for porting. |
Frank S |
Jul 18 2017, 06:31 AM
Post
#47
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 135 Joined: 15-April 15 From: Wiesbaden, Germany Member No.: 18,632 Region Association: Germany |
My verdict is still out on these castings as far as durability goes. My hunch is that they are going to do at least as well as a 40Y.O. casting that's been run through the ringer. That said, I'm willing to build them out with quality parts if people are interested, but I'm not willing to put any[i] warranty on them beyond my workmanship. [/quote] Len, I'm interested in one set build to standard specs (should go into a 2056 keeping the D-Jet). Frank |
gothspeed |
Jan 26 2018, 02:17 PM
Post
#48
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,539 Joined: 3-February 09 From: SoCal Member No.: 10,019 Region Association: None |
EDIT: please disregard this post and bump!! I just saw the GB thread here: http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=319606 |
FUEL14 |
Sep 15 2018, 05:38 AM
Post
#49
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56 Joined: 11-August 18 From: Melbourne, Australia Member No.: 22,382 Region Association: Australia and New Zealand |
I'm just (IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon_bump.gif) ing this thread to see if there are any updates this year about these AA heads. I wonder if McMark or HAM Inc have any recent thoughts about the current quality of these?
Thank you. |
HAM Inc |
Sep 15 2018, 07:59 AM
Post
#50
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 846 Joined: 24-July 06 From: Watkinsville,GA Member No.: 6,499 Region Association: None |
I'm just (IMG:style_emoticons/default/icon_bump.gif) ing this thread to see if there are any updates this year about these AA heads. I wonder if McMark or HAM Inc have any recent thoughts about the current quality of these? Thank you. I've been very impressed with the consistency of the castings. So far they have all machined very nicely and the dimensional consistency of the machine work has been spot on, ie, valve guide bore sizing and spacing, chamber heights and volumes, I could go on. I have now done a fair amount of flow testing with different valve sizes and port mods and found some specific details that these castings respond very well to. Not willing to share those specifics here, but our customers will benefit from this knowledge. Like all other T4 heads the AAP's are capable of making impressive power with the right mods. Still too soon for me to speak of long term service life, but we have gotten nothing but positive feedback regarding valve adjustment consistency on the heads in service so far. To date, every pair we've prepped has received ceramic coating to the chambers and exhaust ports. This will extend the life of any T4 head. World member Shane Sparks got a seriously bad-ass pair of these heads for his ChumpCar. Shane has agreed to share his experience. Endurance racing will be an excellent test of these and any heads. Overall I feel pretty good about these heads, so far, and think they are a much better choice than 40+ years old O.E. castings. Time will tell. |
FUEL14 |
Sep 15 2018, 09:24 PM
Post
#51
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56 Joined: 11-August 18 From: Melbourne, Australia Member No.: 22,382 Region Association: Australia and New Zealand |
Len, thanks so much for the indepth reply. What's the best way to contact you privately to discuss options for a prepared pair of heads? PM? Email?
Regards, Luke. |
HAM Inc |
Sep 16 2018, 08:35 AM
Post
#52
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 846 Joined: 24-July 06 From: Watkinsville,GA Member No.: 6,499 Region Association: None |
|
McMark |
Sep 16 2018, 12:44 PM
Post
#53
|
914 Freak! Group: Retired Admin Posts: 20,179 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Grand Rapids, MI Member No.: 419 Region Association: None |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) Len is far more intimate with heads than I am. But I've used a few sets now and haven't run into any issues. They seem like great reproductions. Oh, but I haven't ordered or inspected their fully built heads. Just the bare castings.
|
Jetsetsurfshop |
Sep 16 2018, 02:21 PM
Post
#54
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 814 Joined: 7-April 11 From: Marco Island Florida Member No.: 12,907 Region Association: South East States |
First, thanks Len for the heads. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Here's a report from my 914 Chump car. I did a test day on September 7th. I did four sessions with about 6-8 laps each at Sebring. While on track I get a chance to look down at my cylinder temp gauge between turn 16-17. I never seen it over 350 degrees. It stabilized after about two laps. Oil temp does too. It was hot at the track and my third and fourth session I ran it pretty hard. Still never seen above 350 degrees. Heres some stuff I can tell you about the heads. The work from Len was great. He could elaborate on all he did. Heres what I can tell you all. He coated in the chambers He notched cylinder head 3 plug for the cylinder head sensor (awesome) He put some special magic black coating on the heads for heat He twisted my arm and made me run ti retainers (for when someone misses a shift!) The heads are not leaking oil from the pushrod tubes. The spark plug placement was correct for my 2.0 liter tin I'm hitting the dyno in a few weeks and I think I should be at 155-160hp. I'll report back when thats done. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) |
FUEL14 |
Sep 18 2018, 05:17 AM
Post
#55
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 56 Joined: 11-August 18 From: Melbourne, Australia Member No.: 22,382 Region Association: Australia and New Zealand |
Awesome... Thanks for sharing this information.
First, thanks Len for the heads. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Here's a report from my 914 Chump car. I did a test day on September 7th. I did four sessions with about 6-8 laps each at Sebring. While on track I get a chance to look down at my cylinder temp gauge between turn 16-17. I never seen it over 350 degrees. It stabilized after about two laps. Oil temp does too. It was hot at the track and my third and fourth session I ran it pretty hard. Still never seen above 350 degrees. Heres some stuff I can tell you about the heads. The work from Len was great. He could elaborate on all he did. Heres what I can tell you all. He coated in the chambers He notched cylinder head 3 plug for the cylinder head sensor (awesome) He put some special magic black coating on the heads for heat He twisted my arm and made me run ti retainers (for when someone misses a shift!) The heads are not leaking oil from the pushrod tubes. The spark plug placement was correct for my 2.0 liter tin I'm hitting the dyno in a few weeks and I think I should be at 155-160hp. I'll report back when thats done. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 01:10 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |