Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

14 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 5 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 123 Distributor Group Buy Thread, Replacement for NLA stock Dizzy's-Order 15 % Discount
Vacca Rabite
post Oct 19 2017, 09:08 AM
Post #41


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 11,391
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(mgphoto @ Oct 19 2017, 10:56 AM) *

I'm not at the debug with the manufacture yet, I'm trying to rule out all my mistakes first.
I'm just saying 95*C?

European website states 100*


100*C is 212*F (I think. Shoot now I'm doubting my metric. I think 100*C is the point where water boils....)

I checked, I'm good. So if your unit is rated to 100*C ambient, that equates to 212*F ambient. I don't care where you live, if the ambient temps can boil water, you have concerns larger then driving around. ;-)

You should be well within spec. I'd still call 123 and talk to someone, or start the email conversation. As the guy who puts off doing these things (just ask McMark), I can tell you it gets easier when you just suck it up and admit when you need a bit of help. I'm STILL learning that lesson. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/slap.gif) I've wasted about 3 years on my build due to being stubborn.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 19 2017, 09:13 AM
Post #42


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,232
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



I agree with Zach....my coffee is kicking in.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mgphoto
post Oct 19 2017, 09:25 AM
Post #43


"If there is a mistake it will find me"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 538
Joined: 1-April 09
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,225
Region Association: Southern California



Sorry that project and gam-gam have to wait, I'm in the middle of a paint cycle.


Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jett
post Oct 19 2017, 09:57 AM
Post #44


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 243
Joined: 27-July 14
From: Seattle
Member No.: 17,686
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I’m in for. DJet version.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 19 2017, 10:14 AM
Post #45


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,232
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



Okay cool.

Ed asked me to get a head count. I.ll update the first page. I.m in for sure so we only need 4 more for the 10% and then 5 more in three weeks for then extra 5%.

I personally am not comcerned about temperature issues.

What this means is that my new dizzy is about 4 weeks out with shipping and my plan is to install it in my 1.7 and keep the stock onenas a spare. Once the 2.0 is done I.ll swap back.

I.ll update the first page when I get home from work.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pvollma
post Oct 19 2017, 12:59 PM
Post #46


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 130
Joined: 12-May 13
From: Camp Hill, PA
Member No.: 15,862
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(914_teener @ Oct 19 2017, 12:22 AM) *

Obviously I.ve asked Ed to speak for this as i am only interested in the D-jet model.

All models that he offers are applicable to the group buy according to Ed and as long as he has a head count by Monday we are good to go. and any questions can be addressed to Ed.

I.ll keep the thread bumped if neccesarry for the next three weeks.

I'm in for 1 D-Jet model.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeff Bowlsby
post Oct 19 2017, 01:23 PM
Post #47


914 Wiring Harnesses
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,283
Joined: 7-January 03
From: San Ramon CA
Member No.: 104
Region Association: None



So for the D-Jet model, am I to understand that:

"Hardcoded advance curves with no vacuum, no bluetooth, with output for D-Jet This is the unit to choose for stock D-Jet users."

This means no more need for the NLA vacuum can and the advance/retard ports it would connect to on the throttle body can be capped off? This is also a replacement solution for the trigger points.

Si? Please confirm.

What mechanism exactly replaces the trigger points and is it electronic or mechanical (can it wear out)? Can these dizzys be repaired/rebuilt/serviced either DIY or by sending back the the mfr?

If so, this sounds like a great solution for the HTF/NLA trigger points and vacuum cans.

There would be no reason now to replace D-jet injection because of HTF /non-existent parts. All wear parts are available MPS, trigger points, injectors, harnesses, sensors.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Oct 19 2017, 01:36 PM
Post #48


Back in the game...trying to keep this one stockish!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 15,448
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Looking at the manual, D-Jet specific distributor can be ordered with a vacuum option, add V before the IE in the part number. No idea if needed or wanted for a D-Jet vehicle.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jeff Bowlsby
post Oct 19 2017, 02:01 PM
Post #49


914 Wiring Harnesses
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,283
Joined: 7-January 03
From: San Ramon CA
Member No.: 104
Region Association: None



I thought if it had 'hardcoded advance curves" a vacuum can for advance/retard would be redundant and unnecessary. My stock '74 2.0L does not have a vacuum advance, only retard, but the 73 2.0L has an advance.

Does this 123 dizzy for stock D-jet provide the advance/retard functions to replace the vacuum can?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd74914
post Oct 19 2017, 02:05 PM
Post #50


Its alive
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,060
Joined: 16-February 04
From: CT
Member No.: 1,659
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(Jeff Bowlsby @ Oct 19 2017, 03:01 PM) *

I thought if it had 'hardcoded advance curves" a vacuum can for advance/retard would be redundant and unnecessary. My stock '74 2.0L does not have a vacuum advance, only retard, but the 73 2.0L has an advance.

Does this 123 dizzy for stock D-jet provide the advance/retard functions to replace the vacuum can?

This is just an assumption, but I doubt it has mechanical vacuum advance/retard. I would think there would be an integral MAP sensor which then allowed use of a 3D timing table with engine speed and manifold pressure axes vs. a 2D with only engine speed.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mgphoto
post Oct 19 2017, 03:15 PM
Post #51


"If there is a mistake it will find me"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 538
Joined: 1-April 09
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,225
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Jeff Bowlsby @ Oct 19 2017, 01:01 PM) *

I thought if it had 'hardcoded advance curves" a vacuum can for advance/retard would be redundant and unnecessary. My stock '74 2.0L does not have a vacuum advance, only retard, but the 73 2.0L has an advance.

Does this 123 dizzy for stock D-jet provide the advance/retard functions to replace the vacuum can?

Single vacuum port, if I have it correct the '74 D-Jet retard port only should connect to the dizzy vacuum port and switch set to B.
'73 advance port connects to dizzy and switch set to #1.
But I could be wrong.


Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pete000
post Oct 19 2017, 03:24 PM
Post #52


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,341
Joined: 23-August 10
From: Rancho Palos Verdes
Member No.: 12,094
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Edward Blume @ Oct 19 2017, 07:38 AM) *

Would the GB include the /6 distributor? Anybody use one for a 2.4 / 2.7 / 3.0?



Inquiring minds want to know.

I also have a friend with a Fiat that would probably buy if the discount could apply.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pete000
post Oct 19 2017, 03:25 PM
Post #53


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,341
Joined: 23-August 10
From: Rancho Palos Verdes
Member No.: 12,094
Region Association: None



QUOTE(mgphoto @ Oct 19 2017, 08:25 AM) *

Sorry that project and gam-gam have to wait, I'm in the middle of a paint cycle.


Attached Image



That looks familiar! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 19 2017, 04:24 PM
Post #54


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,232
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Jeff Bowlsby @ Oct 19 2017, 01:01 PM) *

I thought if it had 'hardcoded advance curves" a vacuum can for advance/retard would be redundant and unnecessary. My stock '74 2.0L does not have a vacuum advance, only retard, but the 73 2.0L has an advance.

Does this 123 dizzy for stock D-jet provide the advance/retard functions to replace the vacuum can?


This is a great question and I had paid it particular attention.

Brad Anders addressed the stock functional characteristics last year to his web page. The change came in 74 apparently.

I am assuming.....and that is a BIG word that the vacuum porting is for the retard function.

It also matters which port that pipes to rhe dizzy. Retard ports are in a different location as noted in your drawing Jeff.

I need to also make this confirmation as well as the TB I have is a 74. I think I.m going to call Ed about this. I am curious if those that have one on Djet set up on stock system alteady can answer this?


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 19 2017, 04:25 PM
Post #55


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,232
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(mgphoto @ Oct 19 2017, 02:15 PM) *

QUOTE(Jeff Bowlsby @ Oct 19 2017, 01:01 PM) *

I thought if it had 'hardcoded advance curves" a vacuum can for advance/retard would be redundant and unnecessary. My stock '74 2.0L does not have a vacuum advance, only retard, but the 73 2.0L has an advance.

Does this 123 dizzy for stock D-jet provide the advance/retard functions to replace the vacuum can?

Single vacuum port, if I have it correct the '74 D-Jet retard port only should connect to the dizzy vacuum port and switch set to B.
'73 advance port connects to dizzy and switch set to #1.
But I could be wrong.


Attached Image




Yes you could be.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mgphoto
post Oct 19 2017, 04:39 PM
Post #56


"If there is a mistake it will find me"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 538
Joined: 1-April 09
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,225
Region Association: Southern California



[/quote]
Single vacuum port, if I have it correct the '74 D-Jet retard port only should connect to the dizzy vacuum port and switch set to B.
'73 advance port connects to dizzy and switch set to #1.
But I could be wrong.

[/quote]



Yes you could be.
[/quote]


From the install manual.

Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mgphoto
post Oct 19 2017, 04:44 PM
Post #57


"If there is a mistake it will find me"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 538
Joined: 1-April 09
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,225
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(pete000 @ Oct 19 2017, 02:25 PM) *

QUOTE(mgphoto @ Oct 19 2017, 08:25 AM) *

Sorry that project and gam-gam have to wait, I'm in the middle of a paint cycle.


Attached Image



That looks familiar! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welder.gif)

Blocked and shot with sealer, tomorrow color.
Thanks pete000

Mike
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 19 2017, 05:15 PM
Post #58


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,232
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



[quote name='mgphoto' date='Oct 19 2017, 03:39 PM' post='2539516']
[/quote]
Single vacuum port, if I have it correct the '74 D-Jet retard port only should connect to the dizzy vacuum port and switch set to B.
'73 advance port connects to dizzy and switch set to #1.
But I could be wrong.

[/quote]



Yes you could be.
[/quote]


From the install manual.

Attached Image
[/quote]


So for the benifit of the other readers what year is your D-jet system and what vacum port did you tap for the 123 Dizzy.

Can you post picture of the distributor installed and leave the hood on another thread please?

Thanks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rhodyguy
post Oct 19 2017, 05:19 PM
Post #59


We're so screwed...
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,594
Joined: 2-March 03
From: Orion's belt
Member No.: 378
Region Association: Galt's Gulch



Who ever installed stratplayer's (Jim) should know the details. Does the 123 take the MPS out of the equation?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914_teener
post Oct 19 2017, 05:38 PM
Post #60


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,232
Joined: 31-August 08
From: So. Cal
Member No.: 9,489
Region Association: Southern California



No Kevin,

Trigger points and vacuum advance can. Two NLA items.

Good idea. Jims is a stock 74 IIRC?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

14 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 5 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th December 2017 - 06:27 PM