Question for you v8 guys??, How does it handle? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Question for you v8 guys??, How does it handle? |
Stephane |
May 26 2005, 05:34 PM
Post
#1
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 45 Joined: 13-February 04 From: New Brunswick, Canada Member No.: 1,653 |
How does your car handle with that big motor? Notice a big difference in handling due to extra weight or higher center of gravity?
Stephane |
Mueller |
May 26 2005, 05:59 PM
Post
#2
|
914 Freak! Group: Members Posts: 17,146 Joined: 4-January 03 From: Antioch, CA Member No.: 87 Region Association: None |
if you have never driven a 914 and a V8 car is your 1st one, you'll never know the differance in additional weight.....
now if on Sat you drove your /4, and then installed a V8 engine that night and drove your car on Sunday, yes, you'll notice the change, but it's not enough to ruin the experiance........ in theory the lighter car should handle better........... |
aircooledboy |
May 26 2005, 06:55 PM
Post
#3
|
Sweet Pea's 1st ride in daddy's "vroom -vroom" Group: Members Posts: 1,672 Joined: 4-February 04 From: Rockford, IL Member No.: 1,629 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
My lowered, front sway equiped, 6 in front, 7 in rear (or is it 7 & 8?) handles like a dream. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/driving.gif) Sticks like glue UNLESS I'm too heavy on the throttle in a turn, which will quickly break the rear loose. Tough to think of that as bad though. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/burnout.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/monkeydance.gif)
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/beerchug.gif) |
neo914-6 |
May 26 2005, 08:31 PM
Post
#4
|
||
neo life Group: Members Posts: 5,086 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Willow Glen (San Jose) Member No.: 159 |
you can put a 50lb bag of sand in each of your trunks, have a 200lb passenger and see if you notice the difference... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/laugh.gif) Like Mike said, you'd have to drive both in comparable cars. Alot of the V8 guys built on non-runners including myself so we don't have a baseline. Generally if you're installing a V8 there are many suspension improvements as well. |
||
914GT |
May 26 2005, 09:23 PM
Post
#5
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,100 Joined: 11-October 04 From: Tucson Member No.: 2,923 Region Association: Southwest Region |
A 300 lb overall increase due to a V8 conversion seems a bit high to me.
|
Joe Bob |
May 26 2005, 09:31 PM
Post
#6
|
Retired admin, banned a few times Group: Members Posts: 17,427 Joined: 24-December 02 From: Boulder CO Member No.: 5 Region Association: None |
Only 8 cars I have driven neglected to do the stuff I have done to my six conversions....I've never ridden or driven one that's been prepped to the degree that "I" would be satisfied.
That said....the extra 300lbs can be written off...IF....the suspension has some attention to it.... |
skline |
May 26 2005, 10:57 PM
Post
#7
|
||
Born to Drive Group: Members Posts: 7,910 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Costa Mesa, CA Member No.: 17 Region Association: Southern California |
I have to agree, 300 seems like a high figure, I dont think it is that much. On top of that, would someone post the weight of a six conversion please? I am to the understanding that it is only about 80 pounds heavier than a 6 conversion. Porsche 6 that is. The engines are quite heavy. And by the time you add all the stuff to go with it, there isnt that much difference. |
||
Aaron Cox |
May 26 2005, 11:03 PM
Post
#8
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
a six has an oil tank and aluminum or magnesium case.
a v8 convo has a big engine bar, a big iron block and heads, and a big radiator up front.... and the weight of all that water (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif) |
skline |
May 26 2005, 11:11 PM
Post
#9
|
Born to Drive Group: Members Posts: 7,910 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Costa Mesa, CA Member No.: 17 Region Association: Southern California |
It is not as much as you would think. If you use aluminum heads the engine doesnt weigh as much as you think. I think it is only about 535 pounds. How much does a 6 weigh?
|
skline |
May 26 2005, 11:18 PM
Post
#10
|
Born to Drive Group: Members Posts: 7,910 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Costa Mesa, CA Member No.: 17 Region Association: Southern California |
I found it, this is copied from Rod Simpsons website.
The Chevy V8 with cast iron heads weighs 490 lbs. The 930 engine weighs 510 lbs. The standard Porsche 911 engine weighs 410 lbs. You can shave approx 50 more lbs off your Chevy by using aluminum heads. So I was wrong about the weight, its lighter than I thought. |
MattR |
May 26 2005, 11:21 PM
Post
#11
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,279 Joined: 23-January 04 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 1,589 Region Association: Northern California |
2.4L is 400 lbs. But remember, it has a much lower center of mass (the engine) because the heads, pistons, and crank are all very low compared to a V8, and a (real) six doesnt have a radiator and water running through it, so that saves weight too.
|
Aaron Cox |
May 26 2005, 11:21 PM
Post
#12
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
|
MattR |
May 26 2005, 11:27 PM
Post
#13
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,279 Joined: 23-January 04 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 1,589 Region Association: Northern California |
One more thing to keep in mind:
The overall weight is significant to a car's handling, but also its distribution of weight is important. The increase of mass in the dead center of the car isnt as significant as increasing weight on the outsides. Since the 914 is mid engined, its distance from the center of mass to the center of the engine mass is relativly small leaving a small moment. What this means; an increase in weight of the engine of a 914 is not AS significant as increasing weight in a 911/912, or any front engine car. The same rules apply for all 3 axes though. So if you increase center of mass in the Z direction (up from the ground), with the same suspension geometry you're going to have more dive on your suspension. |
skline |
May 26 2005, 11:28 PM
Post
#14
|
||
Born to Drive Group: Members Posts: 7,910 Joined: 26-December 02 From: Costa Mesa, CA Member No.: 17 Region Association: Southern California |
But the weight distribution is different also, you add all that weight to the back only with a 6 conversion but with the V8, you add weight front and rear keeping the balance more than the 6. I am sure someone has the figures somewhere. I am not going to get into a pissin match with you about it. Lets just get the cars out on the road and see the difference. My little 914 with the little old small block in it againts your 2.4 liter 6 cylinder that only weighs 400 pounds. We could even stop at the scales and weigh the cars to see just where we are at in that department. Then we could get some actual numbers on weight. Since none of us have them currently, we really shouldnt be talking about what is only heresay at this point. |
||
Aaron Cox |
May 26 2005, 11:34 PM
Post
#15
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
its settled. type 4 baby (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/lol2.gif)
|
MattR |
May 26 2005, 11:36 PM
Post
#16
|
||
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,279 Joined: 23-January 04 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 1,589 Region Association: Northern California |
nice avatar (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif) |
||
Andyrew |
May 26 2005, 11:46 PM
Post
#17
|
Spooling.... Please wait Group: Members Posts: 13,376 Joined: 20-January 03 From: Riverbank, Ca Member No.: 172 Region Association: Northern California |
Having converted mine, I (at first) had problems with it Not being able to stick, and having way to much understeer...
I dont have that problem now... It will feel amazing when you finally get it to stick. Just drive it around with 1/16th throttle and it will be a t4... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif) Thats what I did at the WCC.... Andrew |
MattR |
May 27 2005, 12:01 AM
Post
#18
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,279 Joined: 23-January 04 From: SF Bay Area Member No.: 1,589 Region Association: Northern California |
Everything Im saying comes out of a series of text books. Take it for what its worth.
Im not going to argue a v8 914 handles well enough or anything, thats all driver preference. If you're asking theoretically which one handles better I can help, but I have no hard data to back up my claims. |
Andyrew |
May 27 2005, 12:21 AM
Post
#19
|
Spooling.... Please wait Group: Members Posts: 13,376 Joined: 20-January 03 From: Riverbank, Ca Member No.: 172 Region Association: Northern California |
Obviously the 4 will handle better....
But the question is is it noticable enough, or takes away from the handling enough for it to be noticable enough that a v8 is not a "914" or something.... I dont think its enough difference that it takes away from the 914 aspect... I love going into a corner and powersliding out.. Or not! Andrew |
BIGKAT_83 |
May 27 2005, 04:05 AM
Post
#20
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,798 Joined: 25-January 03 From: Way down south Bogart,GA Member No.: 194 Region Association: South East States |
Here is a copy of a thread from the Pors-chev group about engine weight. I know this is a all aluminum LS1 V8 vs a 3.0 six.
I have seen this issue pop up on this forum from time to time well, I finally got an answer to this myth. I took the time today to take my 1980 911 3.0 SC engine and 2000 GM LS1 Corvette engine to the scales to weigh them and this is what I found out: My fully dressed 1980 3.0 Porsche engine ready to install weighed 472 lbs. Factor in the weight of the oil in the 10 quart oil tank needed to support the 3.0 engine, then your engine plus oil tank weight jumps up to 490. 5 lbs. at the rear of thevehicle. (One gallon of oil is 7.4 lbs. Ten quarts is 2.5 gallons, 2.5 x 7.4 = 18.5lbs.) My fully dressed 2000 LS1 Corvette engine ready to install with the engine computer and wire harness, complete exhaust system, engine mounting brackets, AC compressor, alternator, custom water pump adapter, transmission adapter plate and flywheel weighed 434 lbs. This is a rear vehicle weight savings of 56 lbs. over the Porsche 3.0 engine. I did not weigh the above engines with the transaxle or clutch assembly bolted to either engine. These parts would be used for both installations and their weights would obviously cancel. Just wanted to share this information with you guys. ToyJet. Bob (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/huh.gif) (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/huh.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th May 2024 - 08:41 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |