Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 75 1.8 does not have second oil control Piston?, Is this right....
Rockaria
post Jun 13 2005, 08:18 AM
Post #1


ZippidyDoDah...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 817
Joined: 2-May 03
From: Southwest, USA
Member No.: 645
Region Association: None



Hello Everyone,

Especially you engine experts. This weekend I started my plans to get an external oil cooler added. So I had the car on jackstands and was looking around. I took out the passengers side J pipe for the heating in prep for oil lines, I looked and inspected the oil pressure valve/piston right under the Oil filter. (The one with the 1" wide big Ass flat head screw driver type indention.) Then I went to check the smaller Oil control pistion and to my surprise it looked like it was factory sealed.

This is the smaller piston and spring that is located between the push rod tubes on Cylinder #1. I have a 74 1.8 block on my workbench to play with and it indeed has a big Hex Type Screw cap that when opened has a spring and pison inside. But on the 75 in the car that screw is MISSING and is looks like a factory plug.

Am I insane... The engine numbers match that of a 75 from the factory. Everything else looks right. Did the factory in 75 or so plug that other Oil control area?

Thanks for any insights to this. I wish I could have gotten pictures, but I was barely able to actualy see it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 2)
JWest
post Jun 13 2005, 08:30 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,662
Joined: 6-January 03
From: Fort Worth, TX
Member No.: 97
Region Association: None



Yes, the later engines did not have the second piston.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rockaria
post Jun 13 2005, 08:33 AM
Post #3


ZippidyDoDah...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 817
Joined: 2-May 03
From: Southwest, USA
Member No.: 645
Region Association: None



QUOTE (James Adams @ Jun 13 2005, 08:30 AM)
Yes, the later engines did not have the second piston.

Cool,

Thanks for the speedy reply.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2024 - 06:22 AM