 1973 2.0 rebuild but thinking about some more power, Turbo? Larger pistons/cylinders? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
  |
| Downerman |
 Aug 2 2018, 10:40 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 23-April 09 From: Monterey County, California Member No.: 10,296 Region Association: None  |
I really know the answer to this question but I figure I would ask. I have an original 2.0 engine that is going into my recently bare metal restoration and I need to rebuild it. I don't have it tore down yet and that will certainly help me as I gather the info on the status of the parts BUT, me being me, I want more power but I also want reliability and something that's proven to work and work well over time.
I'm not looking for stupid power but something greater than stock. My gut is telling me perhaps a piston/jug upgrade with a slightly better cam using the stock fuel injection with my heads rebuilt and be done with it....BUT I just can't get the sound of a turbo'd 914 I heard years ago that passed me by in my 911 like I was standing still. I've had many modified cars over the years including ERT's supercharges on some old M3's, my 73 914 renegade with 400 hp and there's always something that requires modifications and engineering efforts (which I do enjoy) but I'm getting older now and really don't want to have to mess with something. More about grabbing the wife and hitting the twisties out here on the central coast of California for the day and then stop at the grocery store on the way home. I hope this rambling makes some sense. Would love to hear from those that have been down this road. Dave |
   |
 
|
| 914Sixer |
Aug 2 2018, 11:30 AM
Post
#2
|
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 8,879 Joined: 17-January 05 From: San Angelo Texas Member No.: 3,457 Region Association: Southwest Region 
|
2056 is a great all around motor. You can do carbs or fuel injection.
|
|
|
|
| mepstein |
Aug 2 2018, 11:37 AM
Post
#3
|
|
914-6 GT in waiting Group: Members Posts: 19,262 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region
|
|
|
|
|
| TheCabinetmaker |
Aug 2 2018, 11:37 AM
Post
#4
|
|
I drive my car everyday Group: Members Posts: 8,300 Joined: 8-May 03 From: Tulsa, Ok. Member No.: 666 |
I love my 2056 with 436 lift raby cam, 911 adjusters, chromolly pushrods, and mostly stock injection. Just had to readjust the manifold pressure sensor.
|
|
|
|
| Cairo94507 |
Aug 2 2018, 12:17 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Michael Group: Members Posts: 9,750 Joined: 1-November 08 From: Auburn, CA Member No.: 9,712 Region Association: Northern California
|
2056 with stock FI is my vote.
|
|
|
|
| ConeDodger |
Aug 2 2018, 12:40 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Apex killer! Group: Members Posts: 23,584 Joined: 31-December 04 From: Tahoe Area Member No.: 3,380 Region Association: Northern California
|
If your not going with a six, the 2056 is best in my opinion. Nice power bump, reliability, driveability, can retain stock EFI. That’s huge, it retains stock appearance, which will become a “thing” soon...
|
 |
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th May 2024 - 10:19 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.