Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> How much tuning? 2056 D-Jet.
MikeM
post Dec 12 2018, 11:07 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 564
Joined: 16-May 10
From: Calgary, Canada
Member No.: 11,733
Region Association: Canada



Hi all...For you 2056 guys out there...how much tuning is involved after building the 2.0 liter to 2056 and keeping D-Jet? Keeping stock cam as well. Does the MPS need calibration and adjustment? Maybe just stick to 94mm?
Thanks,
Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Mblizzard
post Dec 12 2018, 12:15 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



I have done this and agree with Rob on the process. But adjusting the stock system is a pain in the ass.

A couple of suggestions.

Change the cam. Even if you just change to the updated FI compatible cam you will be happier and get more out of your 2056 build.

Be sure you check you deck height and adjust shims to get the compression you want. http://www.cbperformance.com/v/enginecalc.html I did a build and had way less compression than I wanted due to incorrect deck height.

Also confirm your valve train geometry as you may need to make adjustments.

Consider using a modern FI system like Micro Squirt. Full disclosure it is a pain as well but you can actually do a lot more tuning wise with it and the relative simplicity of the system is way better than stock.

Next get the best P/Cs you can afford. AA makes some perfectly fine P/Cs but if you can go with Male or better yet Nickies from the Type 4 store you will not regret spending the money.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BeatNavy
post Dec 12 2018, 12:21 PM
Post #3


Certified Professional Scapegoat
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,924
Joined: 26-February 14
From: Easton, MD
Member No.: 17,042
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Dec 12 2018, 01:15 PM) *

Change the cam. Even if you just change to the updated FI compatible cam you will be happier and get more out of your 2056 build.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) If you're willing to split the case and go that far into the rabbit hole. I'm actually doing that now - building a 2056 with FI-compatible cam to replace my current one that still has the stock cam.

If you don't want to go that far, the simple 96 mm P&C upgrade is fun too.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MikeM
post Dec 12 2018, 12:29 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 564
Joined: 16-May 10
From: Calgary, Canada
Member No.: 11,733
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(BeatNavy @ Dec 12 2018, 11:21 AM) *

QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Dec 12 2018, 01:15 PM) *

Change the cam. Even if you just change to the updated FI compatible cam you will be happier and get more out of your 2056 build.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) If you're willing to split the case and go that far into the rabbit hole. I'm actually doing that now - building a 2056 with FI-compatible cam to replace my current one that still has the stock cam.

If you don't want to go that far, the simple 96 mm P&C upgrade is fun too.

I'm not interested in splitting the case unless absolutely necessary. I'm worried about a bunch of tweeking to the DJET. The car is an LE so I don't want to change too much. It's down on power because it has BUS pistons and cylinders. Other than that it runs perfectly. Maybe sticking to 94mm is the best option. I have another car with a carbed 2.4 so not looking for tons of power.
Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Dec 12 2018, 10:23 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,900
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



QUOTE(MikeM @ Dec 12 2018, 11:29 AM) *

I'm not interested in splitting the case unless absolutely necessary. I'm worried about a bunch of tweeking to the DJET. The car is an LE so I don't want to change too much. It's down on power because it has BUS pistons and cylinders. Other than that it runs perfectly. Maybe sticking to 94mm is the best option. I have another car with a carbed 2.4 so not looking for tons of power.
Mike



My normal response would be "ditch the d-jet and swap the cam to something greater than d-jet could handle" but given your clarification of what you are working with here, I am thinking just go with euro flat top 94's and be done with it. Should give you a minor bump in power over stock without needing to futz with the d-jet at all.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 03:58 AM