Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Factory 914-6 engine mount clearance issue?, When used on a 3.2 or 3.6
larryM
post Apr 6 2020, 10:06 PM
Post #21


emoze
***

Group: Members
Posts: 891
Joined: 1-January 03
From: mid- California
Member No.: 65
Region Association: Northern California



i did 3.2 with my oem -6 mount - no problems - you can't use a 3.2 AC dual pulley - must use single non-AC pulley (i had 2 3.2's - one was AC the other non-AC, so i just used the non-AC pulley - iirc any older 911 single pulley should also work)

Attached Image

(p.s. thanks for buying the Bott kit!)


p. p.s. - for all: i have an oem -6 mount FS





User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Luke M
post Apr 7 2020, 07:01 AM
Post #22


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,370
Joined: 8-February 05
From: WNY
Member No.: 3,574
Region Association: North East States



Thanks for the input guys. The 3.6 did not work out so I went with a 3.2 engine instead.
I have a single belt pulley from a 3.2 here. Once the 3.2 get to me I'll mess around with the mount. I believe it should work just fine.

Thanks Larry for selling me the Bott kit. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lg914
post Jun 8 2020, 06:12 AM
Post #23


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 53
Joined: 4-July 19
From: Lake Geneva
Member No.: 23,275
Region Association: None



QUOTE(mb911 @ Mar 29 2020, 01:24 PM) *

Sorry naroscape and pms..


The naroescape And Patrick motorsprts mounts are different In that they install the engine At different hights. Patrick motorsport Mount puts the engine about an inch higher than the naroescape one.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mb911
post Jun 8 2020, 06:55 AM
Post #24


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,819
Joined: 2-January 09
From: Burlington wi
Member No.: 9,892
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Lg914 @ Jun 8 2020, 04:12 AM) *

QUOTE(mb911 @ Mar 29 2020, 01:24 PM) *

Sorry naroscape and pms..


The naroescape And Patrick motorsprts mounts are different In that they install the engine At different hights. Patrick motorsport Mount puts the engine about an inch higher than the naroescape one.



That is good to know.. Stock oil line may fit then..
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
John
post Jun 8 2020, 03:09 PM
Post #25


member? what's a member?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,393
Joined: 30-January 04
From: Evansville, IN (SIRPCA)
Member No.: 1,615
Region Association: None



The 3.2 stock A/C pulley is easily cut off. On one conversion that I did, I used the 914-6 mount. On the others, I used modified 911 mounts with much shorter arms. Been doing it that way ever since. Of course, my front engine tin is a bit different than the stock 914-6 piece to accommodate the modified 911 engine mount.

I seem to recall that some of the later air cooled 911 engine cases are slightly different where the 914-6 mount and the 911 engine mounts bolt on. I think they added a threaded hole at some point and early mounts can be used if a stud is installed in the correct hole. The later mounts used the other threaded hole. (It's been a while since I've converted one, so perhaps I'm dreaming this up.)


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd May 2024 - 05:23 PM