Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> V8 Engine
pjhaun
post Jul 15 2005, 02:40 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 370
Joined: 21-August 03
Member No.: 1,055
Region Association: None



Can anybody tell me if a stroker engine consumes more gas than a none stroked engine?

Thank You!!!!!!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Jul 15 2005, 02:42 PM
Post #2


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Depends how you drive it.

asside from that.. I dont know!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Jul 15 2005, 03:49 PM
Post #3


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



generally if the displacement is the same there wont be much if any difference.

ideally an over square engine [ stroke is longer than the bore dia.] will be more fuel efficient than a under square engine [ stroke shorter than bore dia.] for the same displacement.

this subject can get very deep in engineering speak and thermodynamic theory.

do you wanna open this can of worms? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/monkeydance.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jul 15 2005, 03:51 PM
Post #4


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE (pjhaun @ Jul 15 2005, 01:40 PM)
Can anybody tell me if a stroker engine consumes more gas than a none stroked engine?

Thank You!!!!!!!

bored with your V6???

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
chunger
post Jul 15 2005, 03:57 PM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 409
Joined: 11-January 03
From: Albany, CA
Member No.: 133



I'm bored with my jackstands. . . (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
pjhaun
post Jul 15 2005, 04:25 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 370
Joined: 21-August 03
Member No.: 1,055
Region Association: None



QUOTE (Mueller @ Jul 15 2005, 01:51 PM)
QUOTE (pjhaun @ Jul 15 2005, 01:40 PM)
Can anybody tell me if a stroker engine consumes more gas than a none stroked engine?

Thank You!!!!!!!

bored with your V6???

Mueller:

I found out that TA Performance in Scottsdale, AZ. has a storker kit for the Buick v6.
And believe it or not they make a Buick v6 aluminum block. They said it weights about 200 lbs. They even make aluminum heads. The v6 aluminum block goes up to 4.00 bore size. The guy I talk to said that these engines can put out over 900 HP with twin turbos.
I thought it be would cool to have an aluminum v6 that would put out 300 HP and only weight about 280 lbs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914GT
post Jul 15 2005, 04:51 PM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,100
Joined: 11-October 04
From: Tucson
Member No.: 2,923
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE (pjhaun @ Jul 15 2005, 01:40 PM)
Can anybody tell me if a stroker engine consumes more gas than a none stroked engine?

Thank You!!!!!!!

A 'stroker' engine may or may not use more gas than a 'non-stroker' engine. Depends on how you are trying to define things. A 383 stroker has less displacement than a 'non-stroked' stock displacement 400, or big block 396, 427, or 454. So in that case it might use less gas if everything else (cams, head, etc.) was the same (which in the real world it won't be). But if you are comparing a 383 which has been stroked from a 350 than obviously its displacement is larger and it will have more torque and power, and probably use more gas in the process.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jul 15 2005, 04:55 PM
Post #8


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



QUOTE (pjhaun @ Jul 15 2005, 03:25 PM)
QUOTE (Mueller @ Jul 15 2005, 01:51 PM)
QUOTE (pjhaun @ Jul 15 2005, 01:40 PM)
Can anybody tell me if a stroker engine consumes more gas than a none stroked engine?

Thank You!!!!!!!

bored with your V6???

Mueller:

I found out that TA Performance in Scottsdale, AZ. has a storker kit for the Buick v6.
And believe it or not they make a Buick v6 aluminum block. They said it weights about 200 lbs. They even make aluminum heads. The v6 aluminum block goes up to 4.00 bore size. The guy I talk to said that these engines can put out over 900 HP with twin turbos.
I thought it be would cool to have an aluminum v6 that would put out 300 HP and only weight about 280 lbs.

sounds neat and expensive...and I like it !!!!!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th May 2024 - 07:56 PM