1973 Black (041) 2.0L Apperance package car - will I be disowned if I put a /6 engine in it? Options

[Tdskip]

I have a "spare" 2.4L engine needing a home. I know, I know, my car and I can do what I want but I don't think this black/appearance package/2.0L combination was falling off tree's back in the day. Original engine is long gone, so it won't ever be numbers matching but I do have a 2.0L in the right engine series for it.

I have a '74 1.8 shell I could build up instead of this one is better off being close to how it was born.

Thoughts?

Thanks and I hope everyone is having a good week.

[DRPHIL914]

if you had the original motor i’d say no, but a nice 2.4 you already have? i’d say yes. only modifications you are really making is welding the mount to the firewall. i’ve heard good things about Bob Seville’s NarroScapes (sp?) mount, but Mad Dog motorsport and Patrick Motorsport will all have their version for doing this. i guess the /6 tin has to be modified and side holes drilled for the stock oil tank for the /6. most say on a non-race car you don’t need a front oil cooler either. if i came along and could source a /6 2.4 or 2.7 let’s say, for same price as having to fix my /4, i’d store the 4 and put in the six. do what you want i think you will be glad you put in the six

[mepstein]

Whatever makes you happy

[BillJ]

If you have the patience/funds/desire to build another car go for it! If you are happy with the black car as it sits then you can customize the other car however you want. Plus you still get to drive a 914 while you build.

Agree without the original motor the value question is less relevant.

[Mark Henry]

A /6 conversion will be worth more than a non-matching numbers car.
But then a /6 conversion will be cost way more to build than a non-matching numbers car.

[bbrock]

I say go for it so my car becomes more valuable (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)

Kidding aside, I'm not really seeing that numbers matching is much of a factor in 914 values, at least not yet. I could be wrong, but with the exception of those rare low mileage, nearly pristine survivors (which obviously will be numbers matching) or an LE, I agree with Mark. Do what floats your boat.

[Root_Werks]

A /6 conversion will be worth more than a non-matching numbers car.
But then a /6 conversion will be cost way more to build than a non-matching numbers car.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

To do a six conversion correctly it's not going to be a money maker or even break even. As been said, whatever makes you happy. Either way sounds like a fun project.

[ClayPerrine]

It is your car. Do what makes you happy.

Clay

[Shivers]

The dimples for the oil tank are already there. It's almost like Porsche designed the 914 to have a six...Oh wait... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Boy the sound alone would make it worth the effort. And you have the engine, that is a tough one.

[gereed75]

the 2.0 four is not numbers matching It will never be an "original survivor" one owner, blah blah blah car. That possibility is gone.

build the six

[PanelBilly]

Put the 2.0 in it and drive it hard

[Cairo94507]

I don't think anyone has ever uttered the words "I wish I had not put that 6 in my 914..." (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

[Tdskip]

First of all let me just say that I really really really appreciate the ability to post a topic like this and get peoples honest and experienced feedback. I consider myself very fortunate to be here as a member.

I think I’m going to juggle the build planning a bit to do this as a /6. Your thought above are kind of what I was thinking but I obviously I wanted to check out of respect for the car. That’s an a any incremental value gained or lost is secondary to my son’s enthusiasm and promise involvement in doing a build.

Thanks again gentlemen.

[Shivers]

A gentle prod (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

[mepstein]

First of all let me just say that I really really really appreciate the ability to post a topic like this and get peoples honest and experienced feedback. I consider myself very fortunate to be here as a member.

I think I’m going to juggle the build planning a bit to do this as a /6. Your thought above are kind of what I was thinking but I obviously I wanted to check out of respect for the car. That’s an a any incremental value gained or lost is secondary to my son’s enthusiasm and promise involvement in doing a build.

Thanks again gentlemen.

“secondary to my son’s enthusiasm and promise involvement in doing a build”

That’s the only thing that matters. People bring back rusty shells all the time. A six mount can be cut off and oil tank holes filled in an afternoon if the next possible owner couldn’t stand it.

[SKL1]

My son found a 2.4 we'll rebuild and since my '71 was my first car and will be in the family "forever" we will be converting it a 6 next year. As both my boys have told me over and over, I should have never sold our "real" '71 914-6 many years ago. It sounded reasonable at the time and it was replaced by a new 993 coupe...

So obviously I'd say GO FOR IT!

[Tdskip]

I will have my son introduce himself in the next month to so.

Thanks!

[Chris914n6]

Given the amount of work involved to swap I'd drive the 73 as is and build the 74 with the -6. The you will have 2 running 914s (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)

[KELTY360]

I’d put a lot of weight on your personal color preference. If you really want a black six then go for it. If you prefer another color then keep the four in the black car and build the six in the other car with whatever color you want.

[BENBRO02]

If it had the original engine in it, I’d say don’t modify it but it doesn’t so I think a Brutus tribute would be cool.