Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Can a1.7l case be substituted by a 2.0l case?
PCH
post Jun 16 2022, 09:50 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 141
Joined: 3-January 19
From: Santa Barbara
Member No.: 22,772
Region Association: Southern California



I have a 1.7l case that has a fatal problem. The engine build has 96x66mm pistons and cylinders and 1.8 liter heads.

Can I use a 2.0l case with the components that I currently have? Or do I have to stick with a 1.7l case?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 6)
BeatNavy
post Jun 16 2022, 10:00 AM
Post #2


Certified Professional Scapegoat
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,924
Joined: 26-February 14
From: Easton, MD
Member No.: 17,042
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



All cases are basically the same. So to answer your question, yes, you can use those components.

What's your goal? You've got a 1911 with those P&C.



User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PCH
post Jun 16 2022, 10:25 AM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 141
Joined: 3-January 19
From: Santa Barbara
Member No.: 22,772
Region Association: Southern California



Garold has a 2.0 l case for sale and I need a case to replace my troubled 1.7l case. I just want to be sure that it will work.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
930cabman
post Jun 16 2022, 10:42 AM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,088
Joined: 12-November 20
From: Buffalo
Member No.: 24,877
Region Association: North East States



According to Jake Raby, the 1.7 case has more material in the area of the journals than either 1.8 or 2.0. So long as everything is straight/round you should be good to go.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BeatNavy
post Jun 16 2022, 11:27 AM
Post #5


Certified Professional Scapegoat
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,924
Joined: 26-February 14
From: Easton, MD
Member No.: 17,042
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(930cabman @ Jun 16 2022, 12:42 PM) *

According to Jake Raby, the 1.7 case has more material in the area of the journals than either 1.8 or 2.0. So long as everything is straight/round you should be good to go.

He's going from 1.7 to 2.0 (in theory), so that's kind of going the other way.

No offense to Garold, who's an asset to the community here and a great resource, but there are probably a lot of 1.7L cases available out there if you put out a WTB. What's most important is bore alignment and whether or not there's droop in the spigots, a function of "less meat" on the 2.0 case but also how much that case has been abused over the years. I'd probably prioritize case condition, type (1.7L vs. 2.0), and case number (just to have consistent with what's supposed to be in there) in that order.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PCH
post Jun 16 2022, 03:42 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 141
Joined: 3-January 19
From: Santa Barbara
Member No.: 22,772
Region Association: Southern California



Thank you for your advice. I appreciate how quickly help is available on 914world!


QUOTE(BeatNavy @ Jun 16 2022, 10:27 AM) *

QUOTE(930cabman @ Jun 16 2022, 12:42 PM) *

According to Jake Raby, the 1.7 case has more material in the area of the journals than either 1.8 or 2.0. So long as everything is straight/round you should be good to go.

He's going from 1.7 to 2.0 (in theory), so that's kind of going the other way.

No offense to Garold, who's an asset to the community here and a great resource, but there are probably a lot of 1.7L cases available out there if you put out a WTB. What's most important is bore alignment and whether or not there's droop in the spigots, a function of "less meat" on the 2.0 case but also how much that case has been abused over the years. I'd probably prioritize case condition, type (1.7L vs. 2.0), and case number (just to have consistent with what's supposed to be in there) in that order.

User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post Jun 16 2022, 04:09 PM
Post #7


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,286
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Core 1.7’s are usually a dime a dozen. Ask around and you should be able to find one cheap. No reason to pay the premium for a 2.0 case when the early 1.7’s are arguably better.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2024 - 06:19 PM