Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Ljet AFR
Geezer914
post Apr 26 2023, 05:36 AM
Post #1


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,417
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



74 914 Ljet injection AFR

engine specs:
2056
CR 9:1
Rabby 9550 cam
50 mm throttle body
Fuel pressure 32lbs. at idle

Currently I have the dynamic AFR set at 13.5 cruising at 3000rpm, but the idle AFR is 16.9! If I move the small arm 1.5 teeth and play with the idle set screw I can adjust the idle AFR to 13.9-14.2, but then that richens up the dynamic AFR is at 10.1! There is no way I can adjust the large wheel to get the dynamic AFR to move from 10.1 to 13.5. Any suggestions? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BeatNavy
post Apr 26 2023, 05:47 AM
Post #2


Certified Professional Scapegoat
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,924
Joined: 26-February 14
From: Easton, MD
Member No.: 17,042
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Try not to chase a specific idle AFR. Type IV's don't lend themselves to that very well.
Focus more on idle characteristics (speed, stability, smell, etc.).

My two cents.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wonkipop
post Apr 26 2023, 06:11 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,299
Joined: 6-May 20
From: north antarctica
Member No.: 24,231
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



i dunno

but fool pressure at idle ought to be at 28 lbs - vac operates the pressure regulator to drop it from the 35 lbs that is in giving it the gas otherwise.

the rest of it is so far off standard spec i cannot comment.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mgphoto
post Apr 26 2023, 10:34 AM
Post #4


"If there is a mistake it will find me"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,339
Joined: 1-April 09
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,225
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Apr 26 2023, 03:36 AM) *

74 914 Ljet injection AFR

engine specs:
2056
CR 9:1
Rabby 9550 cam
50 mm throttle body
Fuel pressure 32lbs. at idle

Currently I have the dynamic AFR set at 13.5 cruising at 3000rpm, but the idle AFR is 16.9! If I move the small arm 1.5 teeth and play with the idle set screw I can adjust the idle AFR to 13.9-14.2, but then that richens up the dynamic AFR is at 10.1! There is no way I can adjust the large wheel to get the dynamic AFR to move from 10.1 to 13.5. Any suggestions? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif)

Problem could be injector size, are you using stock 1.8’s?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Apr 26 2023, 02:31 PM
Post #5


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,417
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



Yes, standard 1.8 injectors.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mgphoto
post Apr 26 2023, 04:00 PM
Post #6


"If there is a mistake it will find me"
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,339
Joined: 1-April 09
From: Los Angeles, CA
Member No.: 10,225
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Apr 26 2023, 12:31 PM) *

Yes, standard 1.8 injectors.

I think your injectors are crapping out at max delivery, look for a set of 912E injectors, you can bring the pressure back to normal.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Apr 26 2023, 05:03 PM
Post #7


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,417
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



Standard Motor Products email.Attached Image
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Apr 26 2023, 05:37 PM
Post #8


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



As I have been reading up on these injectors for my own needs, I found that now "rebuilding" the injector is really simple.

There is an inlet screen, just like the screen in the fuel tank, inside each injector.
We can simply buy new screen now and remove/replace that screen.

Provided the injector still goes on and off properly, and does not leak, it seems that the screen replacement is what more modern folks are doing on cars much younger than our cars.


https://theinjectorshop.com

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Apr 26 2023, 05:52 PM
Post #9


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,417
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



I am using new injectors, they only have 1200 miles on them.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wonkipop
post Apr 27 2023, 06:41 AM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,299
Joined: 6-May 20
From: north antarctica
Member No.: 24,231
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Apr 26 2023, 05:03 PM) *

Standard Motor Products email.Attached Image


i'd say those injectors are already at 912E level and more going on the quoted flow you received.

here is the numbers i have for the standard 1.8 injectors.
112 injectors on 1.8
Attached Image
other information i have from a chart on R Atwell's bus website quotes slightly lower flow rate of 185 cc/min slightly less than 190.2 and 18.1 lbs/hr.

standard injectors notably less than 19 lbs/hr. injector low rate shouldn't be your problem?

Atwell quotes 912E as 187cc/min
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GregAmy
post Apr 27 2023, 07:24 AM
Post #11


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,302
Joined: 22-February 13
From: Middletown CT
Member No.: 15,565
Region Association: North East States



I'm personally not worried about a 16.9 idle AFR, though it may cause idle surging.

I'd be more worried about a lean AFR under load.

You've already exceeded the L-Jet's capability to accomodate with your mods; I'd say pick the lesser of two evils and live with it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Apr 27 2023, 09:07 AM
Post #12


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,417
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



I have it set to 13.5 at 3000 rpm cruising and it dips down to 12.4 under load. Sealed the lid on the AFM. I live in a rural area of South Jersey so it's not like I am idling sitting in traffic. Thanks for everyone's input.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wonkipop
post Apr 27 2023, 04:40 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,299
Joined: 6-May 20
From: north antarctica
Member No.: 24,231
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Apr 27 2023, 09:07 AM) *

I have it set to 13.5 at 3000 rpm cruising and it dips down to 12.4 under load. Sealed the lid on the AFM. I live in a rural area of South Jersey so it's not like I am idling sitting in traffic. Thanks for everyone's input.


in a way you are no worse than a factory 1.8 L jet.
if its original as is mine.
the ignition timing is set up retarded at idle due to the dizzy.
so it runs hot due to that when its sitting in traffic.
i live in the inner city. my 914 hates hot days sitting at idle.
i avoid super hot summer day driving.
primitive emissions tech on these cars was not perfect.
so long as its good at cruise its going to be the best it was anyway, in a funny way. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Van B
post Apr 27 2023, 04:52 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,586
Joined: 20-October 21
From: Maryland
Member No.: 26,011
Region Association: None



@wonkipop shared this link a while back and I think it was a good reference for me whilst working through the tuning process.
http://www.itinerant-air-cooled.com/viewtopic.php?t=7761
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Apr 29 2023, 11:47 AM
Post #15


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,417
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



That is the article I followed. But when you move the small arm to richen up the idle and adjust the AFR to 13.9-14.2, it makes the dynamic AFR overly rich, like 11.1-12.2! There was no way to adjust the dynamic AFR to get it to come back to 13.5. Like I said, if I lived in a high traffic area and spent time idling in traffic I would be more concerned about the idle AFR at 16.9. I feel better to have 13.5 at cruise and not worry about idling at a stop sign for 20-30 seconds
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Apr 29 2023, 12:16 PM
Post #16


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



I think that you may want to consider that these initial old school EFI systems where a lot of compromise to ensure the car did not overheat due to lean conditions.

When I wanted to see exactly what I could get out of a 914 for MPG...there was certainly a lot of room to make the car run leaner.

I did find that even that had limits...but it could be done if you monitor the exhaust gases properly.

Rich

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wonkipop
post Apr 29 2023, 07:45 PM
Post #17


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,299
Joined: 6-May 20
From: north antarctica
Member No.: 24,231
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Apr 29 2023, 11:47 AM) *

That is the article I followed. But when you move the small arm to richen up the idle and adjust the AFR to 13.9-14.2, it makes the dynamic AFR overly rich, like 11.1-12.2! There was no way to adjust the dynamic AFR to get it to come back to 13.5. Like I said, if I lived in a high traffic area and spent time idling in traffic I would be more concerned about the idle AFR at 16.9. I feel better to have 13.5 at cruise and not worry about idling at a stop sign for 20-30 seconds


i think the way these early emissions systems were set up was a factor of the emissions laws and the available technology. particularly the L jets which come in just as the EPA and CARB were tightening and ratcheting up the standards.

from a historical perspective. and as a technical history.

very definitely with the early L jet 1.8s they were set up to at a minimum produce less NOX at standstill idle. this was a feature of all of them in 74. USA wide and california.
primarily that was done with the ignition timing retarded at idle. as a consequence you naturally got more unburned hydrocarbons in the exhaust along with CO. the EPA accepted that at first as NOX was the first primary focus to tackle photochemical smog.
but though they tolerated it as a consequence (until manufacturers could get CATs into production) they still set a standard to be met, which wasn't too lenient. i think the AFM units might be tuned a little to be a little leaner at idle as a result.

it wasn't ideal but they had to meet regulated standards.

it took until you got more powerful ECUs, closed loop systems and most importantly oxygen sensors (also developed and patented by bosch) that you could really properly control the mixture across the entire operational range of the engine.

these early systems in some ways are more like victorian clocks than computers.

and despite all the hoo hah about emissions laws and smogged cars in the early to mid 70s in the USA the EPA never did actually meet the goal set by the Nixon administration of a 90% reduction on 1970 vehicle emissions by 5 years (1975). not even close.
that took until the mid 1980s as it turned out.

i think you just have to live with what the AFM can do as its likely that those very early units which our cars have are designed with an inbuilt bias.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Apr 29 2023, 10:47 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,900
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



How are you reading the AFR and how strong is the idle when its running 16+?

Curious as I have seen a few of the 914 exhaust systems out there will cause falsely lean idle readings due to the lack of exhaust pressure.

13.5-12.4 between cruse and WOT is perfect so unless it is stalling out at idle dont even worry about what the O2 is reading.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Apr 30 2023, 05:46 AM
Post #19


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,417
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



With the Rabby 9550 cam the idle is set at 1100 rpm, The exhaust is SS heat exchangers with a Triad West muffler.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Van B
post Apr 30 2023, 07:16 AM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,586
Joined: 20-October 21
From: Maryland
Member No.: 26,011
Region Association: None



My approach would be to set dynamic fueling as close your target as practical via cog and lever arm offset. Then use the AFM screw to adjust idle fueling. The TPS commands the ECU to provide full throttling enrichment.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 05:33 PM