Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> AFR vs MPG
Geezer914
post Nov 9 2023, 01:19 PM
Post #1


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,418
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



Running a 2056 with 1.8L L-Jet fuel injection. AFR is set at 13.1. MPG is around 20 miles per gallon. Does this look right?
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 15)
VaccaRabite
post Nov 9 2023, 01:22 PM
Post #2


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,444
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Thats about what I used to see as well.

I'm sure it could be tuned for more economy at the expense of power.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
930cabman
post Nov 9 2023, 03:07 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,065
Joined: 12-November 20
From: Buffalo
Member No.: 24,877
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Nov 9 2023, 01:19 PM) *

Running a 2056 with 1.8L L-Jet fuel injection. AFR is set at 13.1. MPG is around 20 miles per gallon. Plugs are a little dark but not fouled. Does this sound right?


Is this in town MPG?

My 2056 with twin 40 IDF's gets a bit over 30MPG at 75MPH highway. No idea what the AFR is, plugs look ok. Funny I have a new LM-2 in the box, can't figure out how to get it going
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
StarBear
post Nov 9 2023, 03:27 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,886
Joined: 2-September 09
From: NJ
Member No.: 10,753
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(VaccaRabite @ Nov 9 2023, 03:22 PM) *

Thats about what I used to see as well.

I'm sure it could be tuned for more economy at the expense of power.

Zach

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) At idle On standard 1.8 FI. Planning on changing our nearly original injectors and checking/adjusting valves (many years overdue) to lean a bit further (running 10.0-12.0) at rpm. Might tweak the AFM a bit more but pretty near point where it hasn’t helped.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
emerygt350
post Nov 9 2023, 06:22 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,099
Joined: 20-July 21
From: Upstate, NY
Member No.: 25,740
Region Association: North East States



That plug looks nice to me. Where is your o2 sensor?

I get almost 20 in town and 28ish on the highway but I drive like gas doesn't matter in town. I can't help it ... Maybe 270 miles on 13 gallons (I don't trust my fuel gauge yet so I always fill up as it drops below 1/4 tank).

On my 2056 djet I am at 14.2ish cruising and between 11-12 on WOT. My O2 is right after the 3 and 4 combine in my ansa (before the muffler).
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Nov 9 2023, 07:47 PM
Post #6


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,418
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



My 02 sensor is in my Triad muffler.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Krieger
post Nov 9 2023, 11:38 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,712
Joined: 24-May 04
From: Santa Rosa CA
Member No.: 2,104
Region Association: None



Looks good. I wouldn't go any leaner.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
930cabman
post Nov 10 2023, 06:20 AM
Post #8


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,065
Joined: 12-November 20
From: Buffalo
Member No.: 24,877
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(Krieger @ Nov 9 2023, 11:38 PM) *

Looks good. I wouldn't go any leaner.


Exactly, I like to see my plugs darker. Detonation is one of the worst events that can happen in an engine
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Porschef
post Nov 10 2023, 03:44 PM
Post #9


How you doin'
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,165
Joined: 7-September 10
From: LawnGuyland
Member No.: 12,152
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Nov 9 2023, 03:19 PM) *

Running a 2056 with 1.8L L-Jet fuel injection. AFR is set at 13.1. MPG is around 20 miles per gallon. Does this look right?
Attached Image



Interesting, I’m running the same setup. Also right around that AFR# and very similar mileage numbers. I always thought it would be a little better but I’m willing to sacrifice mpg’s for engine longevity.

It’s not a DD so I live with it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Nov 10 2023, 04:17 PM
Post #10


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,418
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



Sacrificing some mpg for performance. 20mpg and it's a blast to drive, I can't complain.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris914n6
post Nov 10 2023, 06:09 PM
Post #11


Jackstands are my life.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,320
Joined: 14-March 03
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 431
Region Association: Southwest Region



Could be better. A stock 2.0FI is like 25-30. My 3.0FI was 24-29 mpg @ 90 mph.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Nov 10 2023, 06:33 PM
Post #12


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,418
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



I am running Len Hoffman RS heads with larger valves and a 50 mm throttle body, so not as efficient as a stock 2.0.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
emerygt350
post Nov 10 2023, 07:34 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,099
Joined: 20-July 21
From: Upstate, NY
Member No.: 25,740
Region Association: North East States



I mean, theoretically... You are moving the same weight so it shouldn't take more fuel unless you are driving it inefficiently. I know I am. Just try and miser your 2056 around. I just can't do it. I am always reaching into the throttle....
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Geezer914
post Nov 10 2023, 08:04 PM
Post #14


Geezer914
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,418
Joined: 18-March 09
From: Salem, NJ
Member No.: 10,179
Region Association: North East States



I try to keep the RPMs above 3K as much as possible.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
emerygt350
post Nov 10 2023, 08:07 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,099
Joined: 20-July 21
From: Upstate, NY
Member No.: 25,740
Region Association: North East States



Exactly
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris914n6
post Nov 10 2023, 09:43 PM
Post #16


Jackstands are my life.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,320
Joined: 14-March 03
From: Las Vegas, NV
Member No.: 431
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(Geezer914 @ Nov 10 2023, 04:33 PM) *

I am running Len Hoffman RS heads with larger valves and a 50 mm throttle body, so not as efficient as a stock 2.0.

Air + gas = HP. I've got 190 hp & 205 tq and get 24 mpg around town. Granted I don't have to push as hard to be fast, but it's still a formula that is consistent. A non-track car doesn't need the cooling effect of running that rich.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2024 - 06:07 AM