goint to a SIX, a few questions |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
goint to a SIX, a few questions |
jim912928 |
Dec 23 2005, 08:44 PM
Post
#21
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,485 Joined: 8-January 04 From: Granger, IN Member No.: 1,536 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Patrick Motorsports shows one on their website for like 500 bucks...looks like it might even have a drain plug on the bottom. Anybody have any experience with the tanks he sells?
|
grasshopper |
Dec 23 2005, 09:17 PM
Post
#22
|
||||
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,613 Joined: 10-December 04 From: Valdosta, GA Member No.: 3,258 Region Association: None |
I havn't decided which mount to use yet.. i dont favor the quick six mount very much, but the bulkhead mount is expensive, but i think that is worth it... you have a quick six dont you trekkor?? how do you like it?? |
||||
Trekkor |
Dec 23 2005, 09:23 PM
Post
#23
|
||
I do things... Group: Members Posts: 7,809 Joined: 2-December 03 From: Napa, Ca Member No.: 1,413 Region Association: Northern California |
It's great...No cracks. Easy install. Price was right. Thanks Bill. It's strong. 15 a/x's and 7 track days in a year should prove *something* (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif) Plus, I can go back to a FOUR any time... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/w00t.gif) KT |
||
grasshopper |
Dec 23 2005, 09:31 PM
Post
#24
|
||||
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,613 Joined: 10-December 04 From: Valdosta, GA Member No.: 3,258 Region Association: None |
so are there any down sides to using a quick six mount?? i hear vavle adjustment can be hard with the factory four mounts in... |
||||
Trekkor |
Dec 23 2005, 09:45 PM
Post
#25
|
I do things... Group: Members Posts: 7,809 Joined: 2-December 03 From: Napa, Ca Member No.: 1,413 Region Association: Northern California |
People say they break.
Valve adusts on a SIX are pretty much done with the engine on the ground. Sorry. |
grasshopper |
Dec 23 2005, 09:47 PM
Post
#26
|
||
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,613 Joined: 10-December 04 From: Valdosta, GA Member No.: 3,258 Region Association: None |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/icon8.gif) i'd hate to have my car come to a screaching halt, just to look under and see my engine laying under the car (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/unsure.gif) |
||
Trekkor |
Dec 23 2005, 09:58 PM
Post
#27
|
I do things... Group: Members Posts: 7,809 Joined: 2-December 03 From: Napa, Ca Member No.: 1,413 Region Association: Northern California |
Exactly...
Where are the true life stories? I've only heard that from people for no apparent reason have a problem with PMS (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif) KT |
Aaron Cox |
Dec 23 2005, 10:01 PM
Post
#28
|
||
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
small sixes are ok with a PMS bar.... i hear the big 3.0+ motors break them.... |
||
J P Stein |
Dec 23 2005, 10:43 PM
Post
#29
|
||
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Not at my house. Valve adjusts are easier than a CIS 9eleben. |
||
brant |
Dec 23 2005, 10:49 PM
Post
#30
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,623 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
the PMS bulkhead style is expensive, but it makes motor drops very easy...
heck at the PCA club race in september we dropped the motor 3 times in the pits on saturday.... and I still got some practice and a qualifying session in. (broken rocker shaft) it certainly helps with valve adjustments. so does the right valve cover hardware (which I will have by spring) |
ClayPerrine |
Dec 23 2005, 10:54 PM
Post
#31
|
Life's been good to me so far..... Group: Admin Posts: 15,465 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/agree.gif)
The valve adjust is fairly easy, provided you don't have 4 guys sitting around a 10 degree garage arguing about it. (Hi Lawrence and Gint!!!). As for the tanks, the factory tanks are still available. The quick six mount seems cheezy to me. I would go with a bulkhead mount. The mounts that Rich Johnson sells are much stronger than the factory six mount. No worries about the motor falling out of the car. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/ohmy.gif) |
Trekkor |
Dec 23 2005, 11:13 PM
Post
#32
|
I do things... Group: Members Posts: 7,809 Joined: 2-December 03 From: Napa, Ca Member No.: 1,413 Region Association: Northern California |
I'm all for saving time and doing the valve adjust with the motor in the car...but.
How long does it take? How does one get around the tight quarters? Valve adusts were *fun* enough with the FOUR. KT |
SirAndy |
Dec 23 2005, 11:13 PM
Post
#33
|
||
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,640 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/agree.gif) Rich Johnson front bulkhead mount is what i will be getting for my /6 ... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/cool.gif) Andy |
||
Trekkor |
Dec 23 2005, 11:21 PM
Post
#34
|
I do things... Group: Members Posts: 7,809 Joined: 2-December 03 From: Napa, Ca Member No.: 1,413 Region Association: Northern California |
I guess I'm just missing the obvious, but the PMS bar mount appears to be the strongest part on my car. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif)
KT |
thesey914 |
Dec 24 2005, 04:13 AM
Post
#35
|
||
Senior Member Group: Benefactors Posts: 1,155 Joined: 1-January 03 From: Staffordshire -England Member No.: 66 |
Don't worry the shift bar + clutch cable cushion it... (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wink.gif) I like Rich Johnson's design -it uses 911 mounts which will give me some vibration insulation. Not sure whether PMS has any? I like the swivelling design...but by the time I've removed my gear linkage, clutch cable etc not sure the extra 2 bolts would save that much time & I would have to jack the rear up pretty high to get clearance for valves etc. Perfect on a race car like Brant's I don't like the quicksix -The engine weight is trying to lever the mounts forward and twist the bar - I know there is the brake line + prep but drilling a few holes and welding 4 seams isn't the biggest job? |
||
carr914 |
Dec 24 2005, 10:49 AM
Post
#36
|
Racer from Birth Group: Members Posts: 118,670 Joined: 2-February 04 From: Tampa,FL Member No.: 1,623 Region Association: South East States |
I agree Trekkor, the PMS bar is one of the last things I'm worried about. Most of the guys running HSR are running PMS bars. I've seen a picture of one that broke, but I know it was an early one with a big motor. I've not heard it called a quick-six bar though, as I thought that was a real cheesy piece made somewhere else..
T.C. |
grasshopper |
Dec 24 2005, 10:59 AM
Post
#37
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,613 Joined: 10-December 04 From: Valdosta, GA Member No.: 3,258 Region Association: None |
now i have to make my decision on an engine mount bar (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/unsure.gif) some people say PMS bars are horrible, and some people use and like them... i guess it all depends on experience.... but one thing i dont like, is that if you use a bulkhead mount, it is permanent.... and you might as well remove the original four mounts... so then you can never just bolt a four back in there.... right now i am leaning towards the PMS bars... just because like trekkor said, you can switch back to a four any time, if your SIX goes.... so PMS it is (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif) people, dont insult me too much (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/rolleyes.gif)
|
J P Stein |
Dec 24 2005, 11:00 AM
Post
#38
|
||
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
That's too bad. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/laugh.gif) |
||
nine14cats |
Dec 24 2005, 11:30 AM
Post
#39
|
Bill Pickering -- 914-6 GT aka....Leeloo Group: Members Posts: 2,618 Joined: 10-February 03 From: Campbell, CA Member No.: 287 Region Association: None |
The new PMS bars are fine for a 2.2. The torque gets to them if the motor is too big. They do not recommend using them with the 3.2's or 3.6's. My track 914 has a Rich Johnson mount. When you look at that thing, you can tell it's pretty stout.
My opinion is that with your motor choice you will be fine whichever bar you use. If you go bigger someday, then you have a few choices to make. Bill P. |
thesey914 |
Dec 24 2005, 12:04 PM
Post
#40
|
||
Senior Member Group: Benefactors Posts: 1,155 Joined: 1-January 03 From: Staffordshire -England Member No.: 66 |
Has anyone ever reverted back to a four? Anyway I would've thought most people would sell on their old engine I reckon the four would bolt right in with any bulkhead mount. I cant believe the four is longer than the six even with the impellor housing. |
||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 10:27 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |