Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> OT: Interesting new idea, the six-stroke engine
lapuwali
post Feb 28 2006, 06:40 PM
Post #1


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



Crower (of Crower Cams) has just patented a new "six stroke" engine design. The crank turns 3 times for each single cam revolution. The extra two piston strokes are after the normal exhaust stroke, and involve water direct injection into a closed cylinder. This flashes into steam, and produces a second power stroke. The exhaust then opens to vent the steam. Enough heat is drawn off by this steam production that no actual cooling system is required.

It's claimed this can improve fuel economy by as much as 40%.

He's got a single-cylinder spark-ignition prototype working, and is now working on a compression-ignition version.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 19)
Andyrew
post Feb 28 2006, 06:42 PM
Post #2


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Wow!

But wouldnt that require a lot of water?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Pugbug
post Feb 28 2006, 06:45 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 449
Joined: 14-February 05
From: Victoria, BC
Member No.: 3,604



Interesting idea.

When water turns to steam it expands to 17,000 times the volume of the water...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wertygrog
post Feb 28 2006, 08:10 PM
Post #4


wertygrog
**

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 12-November 05
From: Long Beach, CA
Member No.: 5,114
Region Association: Southern California



You'd have to purge ALL of the water after steambustion before adding gas again....how wouldja do that?


I like the idea though! gas stations and water stations...

brent
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 28 2006, 08:14 PM
Post #5


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE (wertygrog @ Feb 28 2006, 06:10 PM)
You'd have to purge ALL of the water after steambustion before adding gas again....how wouldja do that?


I like the idea though! gas stations and water stations...

brent

Why would you have to purge all of the water? Water injection for boosted cars has been done for decades, so there's no incompatibility.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Feb 28 2006, 08:15 PM
Post #6


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



doesn't sound too efficient for producing power though... but I'm no engineer... what do I know?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SGB
post Feb 28 2006, 08:16 PM
Post #7


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE (wertygrog @ Feb 28 2006, 09:10 PM)
You'd have to purge ALL of the water after steambustion before adding gas again....how wouldja do that?


I like the idea though! gas stations and water stations...

brent

Would you? What about water injection? What does it do anyway? I think this is aa amazing idea. Where is Dave D? Whattayasay MIT guy?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Katmanken
post Feb 28 2006, 08:22 PM
Post #8


You haven't seen me if anybody asks...
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,738
Joined: 14-June 03
From: USA
Member No.: 819
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Whaddya mean it's not efficient...

It ups the efficiency of the engine.... You are getting extra power from waste heat. Might be able to dump the parasitic draw of the cooling fan AND get extra energy from each burn.....

Hope it really works.. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/idea.gif)

Ken
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr. Roger
post Feb 28 2006, 08:23 PM
Post #9


A bat out of hell.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,944
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Hercules, California
Member No.: 3,533
Region Association: Northern California



i love the idea. probably not for high performance engines but i bet that thing can run and run on a gallon of gas.

i'm still dreaming of the day when i have the time and money to pursue my dream of a commercially viable ogle / otto engine. (an engine that runs on vapor instead of atomized fuel)

i hope people never stop thinking outside the box...

it's so fun!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Feb 28 2006, 08:47 PM
Post #10


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE (kwales @ Feb 28 2006, 09:22 PM)
Whaddya mean it's not efficient...

It ups the efficiency of the engine.... You are getting extra power from waste heat. Might be able to dump the parasitic draw of the cooling fan AND get extra energy from each burn.....

Hope it really works.. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/idea.gif)

Ken

2 strokes of "steam power" per 4 of combustion doesn't sound like a real advantage for power... cooling, sure... which would help fuel economy... but it's not going to double the hp or anything... and you'd have to get a 10k redline
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Demick
post Feb 28 2006, 09:06 PM
Post #11


Ernie made me do it!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 2,312
Joined: 6-February 03
From: Pleasanton, CA
Member No.: 257



It all depends on how much power you get out of the steam stroke. If you can get 1/2 the power of a regular power stroke out of the steam stroke, then you will have equivalent power for an equally sized 4 stroke engine.

But the purpose is not for more power out of a certain sized engine. It's about making use of the waste heat of the engine thereby increasing the overall efficiency of the engine. I think it is brilliant.

Bet it runs like crap at startup though.

Demick
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Feb 28 2006, 09:13 PM
Post #12


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



direct inject on fuel really lean should get combustion temps up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SGB
post Feb 28 2006, 09:27 PM
Post #13


just visiting
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,086
Joined: 8-March 03
From: Huntsville, AL
Member No.: 404
Region Association: South East States



crower write-up

James-
this must be what you read...
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)

i want to know more....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Feb 28 2006, 11:26 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE (Dr. Roger @ Feb 28 2006, 06:23 PM)
i'm still dreaming of the day when i have the time and money to pursue my dream of a commercially viable ogle / otto engine. (an engine that runs on vapor instead of atomized fuel)

That system is a hoax. Gasoline has an associated enthalpy (stored energy). No matter what you do to the gas, you can only get so much energy out of its potential. Asking for a internal energy that doesnt exist defies so many laws of thermodynamics. There have been a bunch of articles I've read discounting the theory along with some schoolin'.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Feb 28 2006, 11:37 PM
Post #15


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



This is a really interesting topic. One thing I dont understand his how heat is lost in the vaporization of water. The blurb specifically suggests the vaporization process is self cooling, but with my level of education, that doesnt quite make sense.

I do see the possibility for work to be utilized from the heat through vaporization. Its amazing this hasnt been tried... I mean steam power was one of the first methods of propulsion in automobiles.

Wouldnt there be problems introduced with the use of glow plugs instead of an ignition based spark plug? What happens on the compression stroke with the water in the chamber?

I really need to gather my thoughts and do some freashening up... thanks for posting this! I just lost a few nights sleep.. haha
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 28 2006, 11:43 PM
Post #16


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE (SGB @ Feb 28 2006, 07:27 PM)
crower write-up

James-
this must be what you read...
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif)

i want to know more....

Actually, I read the original blurb in Autoweek. I hope there's lots more information forthcoming. It's been a very long while since anyone has come up with a really new idea in IC engines (well, one that works).

Yes, it wouldn't increase power much, but it should substantially increase efficiency. No cooling system would make the engine a lot smaller and lighter, though much of that would be offset by the water tank. It's a brilliant idea that's been possible for decades, not one that's only possible thanks to some new technology, so it's really amazing no one has thought of it until now.

It's not two strokes of steam power per 1 stroke of gas power. It's one power stroke followed by an exhaust stroke followed by a steam power stroke, followed by a second exhaust stroke.

During warmup, you could use a VTEC like arrangement to kick in a set of cam lobes that allowed it to run just like a normal 4-stroke.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Feb 28 2006, 11:49 PM
Post #17


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,999
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE (MattR @ Feb 28 2006, 10:37 PM)
This is a really interesting topic. One thing I dont understand his how heat is lost in the vaporization of water. The blurb specifically suggests the vaporization process is self cooling, but with my level of education, that doesnt quite make sense.


Well, the heat energy must transfer to the lower energy component of the system, the water, in order to effect steam. It is the same concept (basically) as respiration (sweating).

The water absorbs the heat energy, the heat energy excites the water molecules causing them to expand, the expanding water exerts some force on its container.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr. Roger
post Feb 28 2006, 11:49 PM
Post #18


A bat out of hell.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,944
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Hercules, California
Member No.: 3,533
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE (MattR @ Feb 28 2006, 10:26 PM)
QUOTE (Dr. Roger @ Feb 28 2006, 06:23 PM)
i'm still dreaming of the day when i have the time and money to pursue my dream of a commercially viable ogle / otto engine. (an engine that runs on vapor instead of atomized fuel)

That system is a hoax. Gasoline has an associated enthalpy (stored energy). No matter what you do to the gas, you can only get so much energy out of its potential. Asking for a internal energy that doesnt exist defies so many laws of thermodynamics. There have been a bunch of articles I've read discounting the theory along with some schoolin'.

matt loses 2 respect points.
1 for believing everything he reads and
2 for having a large penis.

Bastard!

just keep to yer learning boy and someday you just might get it.
what did dingleberry do , delete his post?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aaron Cox
post Feb 28 2006, 11:53 PM
Post #19


Professional Lawn Dart
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 24,541
Joined: 1-February 03
From: OC
Member No.: 219
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE (Dr. Roger @ Feb 28 2006, 10:49 PM)
matt loses 2 respect points.  
1 for believing everything he reads and
2 for having a large penis.

Bastard!

just keep to yer learning boy and someday you just might get it.

roger loses 5 credibility points... as subtraction is not his strong suit...

-1 + -2= -3 respect points....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lapuwali
post Feb 28 2006, 11:55 PM
Post #20


Not another one!
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 4,526
Joined: 1-March 04
From: San Mateo, CA
Member No.: 1,743



QUOTE (MattR @ Feb 28 2006, 09:37 PM)
This is a really interesting topic. One thing I dont understand his how heat is lost in the vaporization of water. The blurb specifically suggests the vaporization process is self cooling, but with my level of education, that doesnt quite make sense.

I do see the possibility for work to be utilized from the heat through vaporization. Its amazing this hasnt been tried... I mean steam power was one of the first methods of propulsion in automobiles.

Wouldnt there be problems introduced with the use of glow plugs instead of an ignition based spark plug? What happens on the compression stroke with the water in the chamber?

I really need to gather my thoughts and do some freashening up... thanks for posting this! I just lost a few nights sleep.. haha

The cooling effect is strictly in the "flash water into steam" part. The heat to do this has to come from somewhere, and it comes from the heat that's in the engine already. Thus, "heating" the steam "cools" the engine. Thermodynamics can be odd that way. The heat then can be reused to propel the piston, then leaves the engine out the exhaust.

You basically have to think of heat as a fluid that can "flow" from one place to another. Indeed, all of the early work on thermodynamics was done before anyone knew atoms existed. In Carnot's time (early 19th century), it was literally believed there WAS a fluid at work, moving the heat around. It wasn't until thermodynamics was well established that it was discovered that heat was nothing more than vibrating atoms, but all of the equations still worked. Carnot's cycle is still used today to explain how "heat engines" work.

There wouldn't be any water in the chamber during the compression stroke, as all of the water vapor should have escaped during the "steam exhaust" stroke. As that ends, the normal gas intake stroke would take place, followed by the normal gas compression stroke, the plug would fire, then the gas power stroke, then the gas exhaust stroke, near the end of which the water would be injected, then the steam power stroke, followed by the steam exhaust stroke.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th May 2024 - 01:58 PM