Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Is wider better for Auto-x or a hinderance?, guess it depends on the course...
Mueller
post May 7 2006, 04:11 PM
Post #1


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



I thought I had read a while back that SirAndy had some difficulties on a particular course and "blamed" it on his wider than stock GT flared 9"+ wide tire combo.

According to what I have read, the standard 914 is 65" wide, add GT flares and it jumps to 70" or 2.5" additional per side.

For those that have gone from a stock width car to a one with GT flares or even Bontempi flares, did you have to change your driving technique???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
nebreitling
post May 7 2006, 04:19 PM
Post #2


Member Emeritus
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,314
Joined: 26-March 03
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 478



QUOTE(Mueller @ May 7 2006, 03:11 PM) *

I thought I had read a while back that SirAndy had some difficulties on a particular course and "blamed" it on his wider than stock GT flared 9"+ wide tire combo.

According to what I have read, the standard 914 is 65" wide, add GT flares and it jumps to 70" or 2.5" additional per side.

For those that have gone from a stock width car to a one with GT flares or even Bontempi flares, did you have to change your driving technique???


of course it depends on the course, but i think that the additional tire you can stuff under those flares (can you say,,, slicks!) far outweighs the problems brought by a tight course.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post May 7 2006, 04:26 PM
Post #3


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,486
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



I've had my car as both a norrow body car and a GT flared car. I first thought that the norrow body would help me get though the cones quicker but I would now say without a second thought the wide body is the way to go. More rubber and a wider stance is the fast way around.

Don't blame the width of the car for you being slow or hitting a cone. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
porsha916
post May 7 2006, 04:59 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 1-June 04
From: Greenwood, SC
Member No.: 2,137
Region Association: None



I am not sure that wider is always better at a autoX. I believe that there are factors to consider, weight , HP, torque, tire size & type, suspension setup, and gear ratio's are the major ones. Flares will usually put into another class, you need a lot more than wider tires to be competitive. The 914 is a great car, make improvements go faster and have fun!!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Bill
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
J P Stein
post May 7 2006, 05:18 PM
Post #5


Irrelevant old fart
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Vancouver, WA
Member No.: 45
Region Association: None



When I put wider rear flares on my car they collected cone guts
like there was no tomorrow. The new width takes some gettin' used to....it's always there, so ya gotta take it into account. I don't think I've hit a cone in 10 passes this year. I even missed this one......we're a bit crossed up.The direction of travel is right to left.....Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
turboman808
post May 7 2006, 05:32 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,718
Joined: 31-January 06
From: North Jersey
Member No.: 5,505
Region Association: North East States



I've been at a few autox where they have these boxes you have to get thru. I gues on those it can slow you down but overall wider is better.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post May 7 2006, 08:45 PM
Post #7


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,625
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(nebreitling @ May 7 2006, 03:19 PM) *

of course it depends on the course, but i think that the additional tire you can stuff under those flares (can you say,,, slicks!) far outweighs the problems brought by a tight course.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) that "gate" after the long sweeper at the last AX in alameda was the exception ...
usually, a course does not get that tight. of course, it was only too tight because we 914 drivers could do the sweeper full throttle and were carring a lot of speed out of the sweeper and into the "gate".
i *could* have braked and slowed down and drive through in an angle without hitting a cone. would probably have cost me 3 sec., so i rather went for one cone.
even made it through clean 3 times (out of 7).

but it was tight like ******, maybe 2" on each side max. with the wider flares, if that ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) Andy
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post May 7 2006, 09:09 PM
Post #8


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 120,486
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



If the designer lays out a course that you can't drive thru he needs to be (IMG:style_emoticons/default/chair.gif)

I've seen it happen and and the dumbass just said "Well you need to slow down more." I wanted to kick his ass. A course needs to be able to be driven, and at speed, thats the whole point. It has to have a certain "flow" to it. Not to tip toe around cones at 5 mph.

Just my $.02...
Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
grantsfo
post May 7 2006, 10:00 PM
Post #9


Arrrrhhhh!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 16-March 03
Member No.: 433
Region Association: None



The advantage of wider stickier tires far outweighs the minimal amount of wider track if you have the power to push them. You'll find far more places where wider track and more tire are an advantage rather than a disadvantage compared to a car with narrow tires and track.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DanT
post May 7 2006, 10:09 PM
Post #10


Going back to the Dark Side!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,300
Joined: 4-October 04
From: Auburn, CA
Member No.: 2,880
Region Association: None



QUOTE(SirAndy @ May 7 2006, 07:45 PM) *

QUOTE(nebreitling @ May 7 2006, 03:19 PM) *

of course it depends on the course, but i think that the additional tire you can stuff under those flares (can you say,,, slicks!) far outweighs the problems brought by a tight course.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) that "gate" after the long sweeper at the last AX in alameda was the exception ...
usually, a course does not get that tight. of course, it was only too tight because we 914 drivers could do the sweeper full throttle and were carring a lot of speed out of the sweeper and into the "gate".
i *could* have braked and slowed down and drive through in an angle without hitting a cone. would probably have cost me 3 sec., so i rather went for one cone.
even made it through clean 3 times (out of 7).

but it was tight like ******, maybe 2" on each side max. with the wider flares, if that ...
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) Andy


Andy,
GGR rules for AX courses. Minimum width in straights..20 feet. Minimum width in corners is 25 feet inside radius. If it was tighter than that is was an illegal course for a GGR event. I have spent many a morning going around pacing off areas and moving cones out to the minimum legal width. If you find one that is questionable find the course designer or one of the AX chairs. If they don't correct it refer them to the rule book...if no joy then protest the event and results. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
Might as well stir the pot.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/burnout.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post May 8 2006, 09:12 AM
Post #11


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



I was on course set-up one time at Marina.
The designer and his son were not too happy with me as I was right behind them moving their cones and telling them over and over how they were building an illegal course... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/busted_cop.gif)


KT
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post May 8 2006, 09:20 AM
Post #12


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



Wider is better. I had switched between Fuchs and Kumhos vs. Hoosiers and 8" wide rims.

The wider stance and wider tires has more grip.
If the course is so tight that I can't get the car to rotate well it was a bad design.

Skinny tires enable the car to rotate quicker so you gotta drive it like a "drifting Pro".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th May 2024 - 08:45 AM