Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Cam recommendation for normally asperated??, turbo project being shelfed for a while
Mueller
post Sep 29 2003, 12:53 AM
Post #1


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



I won't be able to properly finish the turbo engine for a few months or longer due to time and budget reasons, so I'm going to have to put my motor together as a normally asperated engine and run it until things look a little better time/money wise.

The "turbo" cam will be put off to the side, I can run my stock cam or since the motor is taken apart already, spend a few dollars for a decent cam. The motor will remain fuel injected (Megasquirt or Haltec, depends on it Brad wants the Haltec back since I'm not going to "need" it for quite some time)

For the exhaust I have stock 2.0 exchangers or European Racing Header

So, cams????

I have access to a brand new Engle FK10 cam or should I get a more aggressive but streetable FI or Carb cam??

The motor will be basicly stock, the Pauter roller rockers will be more than likely put for sale, but I think I'll keep the ARP head and case bolts and use them.

The pistons and cylinders are flat top Euro spec (I think I figured out 7.7:1 compression with the old set of heads, I'm waiting for the heads to come back from the machine shop, not sure what all was done to them.

thanks,
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Sep 29 2003, 12:56 AM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



I should add:

stock 2.0 bore and stroke
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisReale
post Sep 29 2003, 01:28 AM
Post #3


Sleazy
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,665
Joined: 20-January 03
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 176



Well, I think alot will depend on how adjustable the FI is. If it is adjustable like a carb, Id say get a fucking raw cam and build a raw motor...but, if you want it to be drivable around town, maybe something more tame, like a Web 73?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Charles Deutsch
post Sep 29 2003, 07:43 AM
Post #4


Unregistered









I'd go with Webcam's 86a. It might be a good idea to plug the motor's specs into Engine Analyzer or DeskTop Dyno and look at the hp and torque curves that the different cams produce.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DNHunt
post Sep 29 2003, 08:05 AM
Post #5


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



I guess I would wait to see what the heads are like. What do you expect the porting to be like? Is the intake going to be stock? Will you be able to flow enough air at higher rpms? If the valve train is stock do you want to turn the engine faster than 5600 ? If you go with longer duration are you willing to put up with changes in vacuum signature and a rough idle?

I think I'd wait a while and answer some of these questions first. I imagine that others can think of more.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Sep 29 2003, 08:56 AM
Post #6


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



Check out Web Cam http://www.webcamshafts.com/volkswagen-auto.html

If you're going mild the 86a or 494 looks good. I sort of like the idea of the 494 for more mid range torque.

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Charles Deutsch
post Sep 29 2003, 09:08 AM
Post #7


Unregistered









Info on the aircooled.net site says the 494 cam is good for only 40K miles.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fiid
post Sep 29 2003, 11:32 AM
Post #8


Turbo Megasquirted Subaru Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,827
Joined: 7-April 03
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 530
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(ChrisReale @ Sep 28 2003, 11:28 PM)
Well, I think alot will depend on how adjustable the FI is. If it is adjustable like a carb, Id say get a fucking raw cam and build a raw motor...but, if you want it to be drivable around town, maybe something more tame, like a Web 73?

With the megasquirt, you should be able to adjust for any cam you feel like.

Get something as hot as you are willing handle in terms of reliability and then bust out your mstweak3k (I take it you have WB-O2? if not - you can borrow mine once I get it in a box.) You should be able to get anything to run with an MS.

Fiid.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Sep 29 2003, 11:44 AM
Post #9


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Put the Engle in it Mike. If you look at the specs ..it is VERY aggressive.

Buil the engine just llike you where going to for the Turbo engine.. just leave the turbo off. If you want to stop by today.. You can drive a 86a car with Euro P+C's and 40 Webers. Runs good all the way to 6k RPM.



B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Britain Smith
post Sep 29 2003, 11:46 AM
Post #10


Nano Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,354
Joined: 27-February 03
From: Hillsboro, OR
Member No.: 364



I suggested to him that he could use the elgin cam that cam off my NA motor...

I am going to buy the rockers from him when he sells them.

-Britain
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
seanery
post Sep 29 2003, 11:58 AM
Post #11


waiting to rebuild whitey!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 15,852
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Indy
Member No.: 100
Region Association: None



who's got the 86a? Mine is a 494.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
maf914
post Sep 29 2003, 02:00 PM
Post #12


Not a Guru!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,049
Joined: 30-April 03
From: Central Florida
Member No.: 632
Region Association: None



Whats the story with the 40K life for the Web Cam 494? Charles is correct that the aircooled.net catalog indicates this. It does have high lift with a relatively short duration. This is good for torque, but are the lobe ramps too steep?

Has anybody heard about this before?

Mike
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dman
post Sep 29 2003, 02:13 PM
Post #13


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 163
Joined: 18-February 03
From: Sacramento CA
Member No.: 311



I've got an 86a and webber 44's, MSD and heavy valve springs on a stock 2.0.

It took some patience to get it to idle below 1000 the MSD really helped fix that. The thing really wants to run in the 3000-6000 rpm range. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

I think Jake suggests the 163/86a
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Charles Deutsch
post Sep 29 2003, 02:20 PM
Post #14


Unregistered









Alright, what's a 163/86a?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Sep 29 2003, 02:47 PM
Post #15


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



After talking to The Brad (and Engle), I'm going to bump up the compression and run the Engle FK-10 cam.

It's an aggressive puppy, but with the Megasquirt, it should not be a problem (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) (famous last words, LOL)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brett W
post Sep 29 2003, 02:54 PM
Post #16


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,856
Joined: 17-September 03
From: huntsville, al
Member No.: 1,169
Region Association: None



I am running the 163/86b in my 2056. Great cam. I feel it needs some more compression though. 8.9 is just not enough. Mike if you plan on going hog wild with the cam you need to raise the compression. 7.7 is too low. go for at least 9.0. 9-5 would be better. What lobe center is the FK10 cut on? I had the 163/86b cut on a 104. really a fun cam. Look for a cam on the 106-107 range for a smooth power curve. You definitely need to be running the header. that is what is holding mine back. I put 118 down on the rollers through a set of stock heat exchangers with a cross over welded into each side. I definitely need to get the header built for it. I am looking at a special cam for the engine I am building right now, something in between a 494 and an 86b. I am talking with webcam about something a little custom. should be neat as hell.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Sep 29 2003, 11:23 PM
Post #17


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,082
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Not to hi-jack the thread but I want to know more about the pauter rockers. Are they the stock ratio?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
crash914
post Sep 30 2003, 05:39 AM
Post #18


its a mystery to me
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,826
Joined: 17-March 03
From: Marriottsville, MD
Member No.: 434
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Here is my fall/snowbound project...

Split the case, my car has been a track car for what 8+ years? I have pounded hard for the last 3 years so I have no idea what is inside. Ok, stroker crank, hot cam, megasquirt, stock piston/cylinders and head rebuild.. My heads I think are already ported and should be ok. When I have the $$$$$ for nice cylinders, I can install quickly with out a complete teardown.

Thoughts?? Thanks, herb
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2024 - 07:33 AM