Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
 Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How fast is a 2.0, 0-60 and quarter mile
Randal
post Oct 15 2003, 05:34 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750
Does anyone have real time figures on 0-60 or quarter mile for a 2.0 914?

Ideally I looking for someone that has dyno'd about 100hp at the rear wheels.

I need the figures for a simple excel autox model that will compare performance of any two cars based upon finishing time, overall course length, length of straights and a index of performance between any two cars.

Actually I'd take my 2.0 out and try it on Foothill Express Way, but I've seen two people, including a beautiful 914 (6), get busted just the other day.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Oct 15 2003, 05:47 PM
Post #2


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869
What luck! The factory was looking out for us!

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

0-100km/62mph 10.5 seconds/kiloyears
Standing kilometer 32sec @ 19,418 mph


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Oct 15 2003, 06:01 PM
Post #3


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,640
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California
QUOTE(redshift @ Oct 15 2003, 04:47 PM)
seconds/kiloyears

huh? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
seanery
post Oct 15 2003, 06:05 PM
Post #4


waiting to rebuild whitey!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 15,852
Joined: 7-January 03
From: Indy
Member No.: 100
Region Association: None
=our cars are slow
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Oct 15 2003, 06:06 PM
Post #5


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869
QUOTE(SirAndy @ Oct 15 2003, 08:01 PM)
QUOTE(redshift @ Oct 15 2003, 04:47 PM)
seconds/kiloyears

huh? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)

heh, what he said ^^


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Oct 15 2003, 06:15 PM
Post #6


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest
0-60 is about 7.6 secs
1/4 mile is about 15.5 sec

How is that for a seat of the pants estimate?



Geoff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Charles Deutsch
post Oct 15 2003, 06:24 PM
Post #7


Unregistered
...


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Oct 15 2003, 06:27 PM
Post #8


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None
I wonder if he still owns this car ????
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Charles Deutsch
post Oct 15 2003, 06:32 PM
Post #9


Unregistered
Compare the performance numbers of the (then) 15-year-old, 914 2.0 with 96000 miles on the clock to the new MR2, CRX Si and Fiero http://persweb.direct.ca/aschwenk/914page11.htm . Click the "next" button at the bottom left corner of the pages.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mskala
post Oct 15 2003, 07:33 PM
Post #10


R
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,925
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Massachusetts
Member No.: 79
Region Association: None
QUOTE(Bleyseng @ Oct 15 2003, 07:15 PM)
0-60 is about 7.6 secs
1/4 mile is about 15.5 sec

How is that for a seat of the pants estimate?

Not bloody likely.

But then he did say 100 RW hp, which would be a decently
built 2.0 with about 115hp by itself. Then you might have it
about right. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_flagge24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Oct 15 2003, 07:37 PM
Post #11


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest
I have hit the 95 hp on the dyno and my car is faster than the stock 2.0L so that was a guess.

Geoff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rhodyguy
post Oct 15 2003, 07:43 PM
Post #12


Chimp Sanctuary NW. Check it out.
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,080
Joined: 2-March 03
From: Orion's Bell. The BELL!
Member No.: 378
Region Association: Galt's Gulch
i take it that was when your car was road worthy.

kevin
"too many freaks, not enough circusses"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Oct 15 2003, 08:00 PM
Post #13


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest
It always road worthy, sometimes I work on to fix things I broke!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Randal
post Oct 15 2003, 10:30 PM
Post #14


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,446
Joined: 29-May 03
From: Los Altos, CA
Member No.: 750
Good guess Geoff at 7.5 (0-60) and 15.5 (1/4 mile). I'm going to plug those numbers into the model. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif)

Thanks.

Randal
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Oct 15 2003, 11:13 PM
Post #15


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869
The number I posted (excepting the obvious parts) were real factory 2.0 numbers.

I think 7.5 is outrageously low.

0-100km/62mph 10.5 seconds

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Boldylocks
post Oct 15 2003, 11:22 PM
Post #16


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 120
Joined: 10-September 03
From: San Diego -CA-
Member No.: 1,135
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif) How fast...LOL...
Smokers with nasal plugs can hold their smoke longer..but, THEY DONT LOOK AS GOOD!!!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EdwardBlume
post Oct 15 2003, 11:37 PM
Post #17


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 12,338
Joined: 2-January 03
From: SLO
Member No.: 81
Region Association: Central California
Randal, What model are you looking at? Also, you need to incorporate less weight of your car if you've been able to lighten it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
crash914
post Oct 16 2003, 06:09 AM
Post #18


its a mystery to me
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,826
Joined: 17-March 03
From: Marriottsville, MD
Member No.: 434
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region
Ok, here is mine....tired 2.0

2300 # with driver.
11 sec. 0-60
77 RWHP
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Oct 16 2003, 08:39 AM
Post #19


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest
Ahhh, if you run shorter gears, smaller sticky tires(205x50's) and have more hp with a tuned djet you would be surprised how quickly you can get to 60mph!
Most stock 2.0l's run about 75 to 80 hp at the rear wheels, so adding about 15more hp makes a little bit of a difference.
Geoff (IMG:style_emoticons/default/MDB2.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BIGKAT_83
post Oct 16 2003, 09:54 AM
Post #20


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,798
Joined: 25-January 03
From: Way down south Bogart,GA
Member No.: 194
Region Association: South East States
Got a copy of the orginal Car and Driver roadtest of a 73 2.0L and the 0-60 time was 10.7 sec and the 1/4 mile was 17.48 @ 76.98mph

1970 914/6 was 0-60 8.7sec and 1/4 mile at 16.3 at 83 mph and this was a Road and Track test.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · 914World Garage · Next Newest »
 

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Display Mode: Standard · Switch to: Linear+ · Switch to: Outline

Track this topic · Email this topic · Print this topic · Subscribe to this forum

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 04:01 PM
Invision Power Board v9.1.4 © 2024  IPS, Inc.
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community!
We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ...