Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Motor choices..., Too many options!!
rtalich
post Oct 12 2006, 08:55 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 25-September 06
From: Bellevue, WA
Member No.: 6,913
Region Association: None



So far I've seen/heard/read about the 2056 and 2270 type 4 motors. What about the 2165? What bore/stroke combo would this be?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MoveQik
post Oct 12 2006, 08:56 PM
Post #2


What size wheels can I fit?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,645
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Member No.: 3,881
Region Association: Southwest Region



3.2 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Oct 12 2006, 09:02 PM
Post #3


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,066
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



lets back up...what motor do you have now?
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Oct 12 2006, 09:02 PM
Post #4


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



what abotu the 1911..?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Oct 12 2006, 09:04 PM
Post #5


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,066
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Britt were on the same wavelengh (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)
Ive been driving mine the last couple of days and
I must say...SWEET!
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rtalich
post Oct 12 2006, 09:09 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 279
Joined: 25-September 06
From: Bellevue, WA
Member No.: 6,913
Region Association: None



What???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Oct 12 2006, 09:22 PM
Post #7


2270 club
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 3,107
Joined: 1-February 03
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Member No.: 218



I'm pretty sure a 2165 is a Type I engine. Here's a chart of Torque curves I've made for a tired 2L, stock 2L, 2056, and 2270. The 2056 is nice bump but the 2270 is in a whole other league.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Oct 12 2006, 09:32 PM
Post #8


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,623
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



My preference is the 1991.
This is at 5000ft altitude, and 104 degree's F.
If it were adjusted to flywheel and altitude/temp... I'm thinking around 175HP


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Oct 12 2006, 09:38 PM
Post #9


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,623
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(TROJANMAN @ Oct 12 2006, 08:37 PM) *

which car is that from brant?


orange car..
the only one I've ever had on a dyno
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TROJANMAN
post Oct 12 2006, 09:45 PM
Post #10


Looks nice in pictures.........
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,271
Joined: 5-March 04
From: Colorado
Member No.: 1,753
Region Association: None



but that's a 6.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bd1308
post Oct 12 2006, 09:47 PM
Post #11


Sir Post-a-lot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,020
Joined: 24-January 05
From: Louisville,KY
Member No.: 3,501



Rich, you and me were on the same wavelength?

1911 is one torquey beast from what i hear.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Trekkor
post Oct 12 2006, 10:01 PM
Post #12


I do things...
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,809
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Napa, Ca
Member No.: 1,413
Region Association: Northern California



In the future... We'll all have SIXES
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Oct 13 2006, 06:49 AM
Post #13


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,623
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



QUOTE(TROJANMAN @ Oct 12 2006, 08:45 PM) *

but that's a 6.


but Will's started it.
he said 3.2

brant
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bleyseng
post Oct 13 2006, 08:13 AM
Post #14


Aircooled Baby!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,034
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Seattle, Washington (for now)
Member No.: 24
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Rob has a 2.0L....

2056 is a nice bump in hp/torque and won't break the bank, figure 'bout 110-115hp
won't break your wallet either- $3500/5000

2270 is a big jump somewhere in the 130 to 170 hp range depending on the combo and starts at 'bout $5k

1911 is a cheap ass motor that whimps run when they don't have any money.

you can do a six for less than $5k if you steal half the parts at night off parked 911's
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
914werke
post Oct 13 2006, 08:30 AM
Post #15


"I got blisters on me fingers"
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,066
Joined: 22-March 03
From: USofA
Member No.: 453
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/chairfall.gif) Hey Geoff (IMG:style_emoticons/default/KMA.gif)
Britt not so much. Short stroke + big bore = rev'er
Having both the 2.0 has more torque
Dont get me wrong still a good combo!
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TROJANMAN
post Oct 13 2006, 09:19 AM
Post #16


Looks nice in pictures.........
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,271
Joined: 5-March 04
From: Colorado
Member No.: 1,753
Region Association: None



Suby, Suby, Suby (IMG:style_emoticons/default/pray.gif)

But i think i want my next car to be a V8 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/burnout.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Matt Meyer
post Oct 13 2006, 09:45 AM
Post #17


Überlurker
**

Group: Members
Posts: 216
Joined: 2-December 03
From: Eastern Washington
Member No.: 1,411
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



To actually answer your question it looks like a 2165 would be a 94x78 so a stroked 2.0 liter. I haven't heard of one before. It should have good torque. Why not go to a 2176 with a 78.4 stroke? I assume you are going to try and save $$$ by reusing the 94mm p&c.

Mostly you hear of 2056 and 2270 which are 96 bore and 71mm (stock2.0) or 78.4 stroke respectively.

You can find different combinations you could make here: Type IV Engine Displacement Bore vs. Stroke
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
grantsfo
post Oct 13 2006, 10:11 AM
Post #18


Arrrrhhhh!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 16-March 03
Member No.: 433
Region Association: None



QUOTE(trekkor @ Oct 12 2006, 09:01 PM) *

In the future... We'll all have SIXES

.....Assimilate.

(IMG:http://www.digitkit.com/attachedimages/Borg%20PartyDSC_3387_2_medium.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
anthony
post Oct 13 2006, 10:17 AM
Post #19


2270 club
****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 3,107
Joined: 1-February 03
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Member No.: 218



QUOTE(grantsfo @ Oct 13 2006, 09:11 AM) *

QUOTE(trekkor @ Oct 12 2006, 09:01 PM) *

In the future... We'll all have SIXES

.....Assimilate.




I have a big six ... in my 911. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TJB/914
post Oct 13 2006, 10:21 AM
Post #20


Mid-Engn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 24-February 03
From: Plymouth & Petoskey, MI
Member No.: 346
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Here's my opinion on motors.

The problem is the F.I. system & electrical systems on a 30-year plus car. If someone would repo a replacement (reasonable) F.I. system for our 4-cyl motor no one would be talking about replacing type-!V motor's. Of course many would still do 6's & Stuby's. etc, but the real problem is the electrical system & F.I. system. Replacement parts are getting scarce & that's the reason many look at alternate(modern/new) power plants. I would like to have a 6-cyl, chevy V/8 or Stuby motor, but it's not practical $$ wise.

Find a reasonable $$ new replacement F.I. sytems for our stock motors and many will stay with their stock motor. I'll keep looking at Raby's motor's & hope someone comes out with a new (repo) Type-4 replacement F.I. System to fit my motor. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) Read the tea leaves, Raby motor's will be the choice (best dollar value) motor for the future value of 914's. Raby motor's are the only real current choice. He has a lock on the market (don't tell him) with all his available upgrades & improvements. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/thumb3d.gif) It's a good value.

Tom

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 01:30 PM