Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> E85, Just dreaming
zen motorcycle
post Dec 7 2006, 02:45 PM
Post #1


almost not a newbie ( way less than a newbie)
**

Group: Members
Posts: 259
Joined: 21-May 06
From: Dallas
Member No.: 6,038
Region Association: None



Has anyone looked into what it would take to rebuild an engine to make it E85 compatible. I hear it is supposed to make more HP than 10% sounds like a good way to pick up some added HP's

Just wondering
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Crazyhippy
post Dec 7 2006, 02:52 PM
Post #2


Insert witty comment here...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,659
Joined: 28-July 05
From: Home of the Coyotes, AZ
Member No.: 4,493
Region Association: None



e-85 has less energy per gallon than reg gas, so your mileage will go down.

The re-build would require new rubber throughout (including inside the fuel pump and injectors) as e-85 eats regular rubber.

BJH
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bondo
post Dec 7 2006, 02:59 PM
Post #3


Practicing my perpendicular parking
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,277
Joined: 19-April 03
From: Los Osos, CA
Member No.: 587
Region Association: Central California



Making it work is no biggie, taking advantage of the ability to make a little more power probably is a biggie. I'm no expert, but I'm guessing you'd have to at least change the compression ratio.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Dec 7 2006, 04:32 PM
Post #4


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



head temps would go down!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
alpha434
post Dec 7 2006, 07:46 PM
Post #5


My member number is no coincidence.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,154
Joined: 16-December 05
From: Denver, CO
Member No.: 5,280
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Big compression difference to get comparable horsepower, efficiency

But I was thinking the same thing.......

and by the time you get the same h.p., you're making the same amount of heat.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Dec 7 2006, 08:08 PM
Post #6


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(alpha434 @ Dec 7 2006, 05:46 PM) *

Big compression difference to get comparable horsepower, efficiency

But I was thinking the same thing.......

and by the time you get the same h.p., you're making the same amount of heat.

no so young one.

you can go up to 12-13/1 compression with e-85 to get "some more power" on the t-4 maybe 10hp worth.

fuel consumption will still be higher than straight gas.

the evaporative nature of all alcohol fuel and the lower cumbustion temps will not get as hot as with gas fuel.

800hp 410ci sprint cars run a stupid small radiator and no fan, and still have a hard time getting heat in the the engine.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Dec 7 2006, 08:10 PM
Post #7


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



e85 might be the turbo friendly fuel for t-4s.

Jake any thoughts or tests planed?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Crazyhippy
post Dec 7 2006, 10:56 PM
Post #8


Insert witty comment here...
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,659
Joined: 28-July 05
From: Home of the Coyotes, AZ
Member No.: 4,493
Region Association: None



still will have the normal turbo problems... the heads will still try to seperate from the cylinders under boost, fuel wont help that.

I had a methonal burning outboard.. 375HP and could pick the motor (powerhead, not complete) up and carry it across the shop.

BJH
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
cnavarro
post Dec 8 2006, 10:28 AM
Post #9


Cylinder Guru
**

Group: Members
Posts: 472
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Chicagoland!
Member No.: 49
Region Association: None



The problem is availablility. Even here in the corn belt, there only one E85 gas station, and it is on the far side of the county - over 30 min away and nowhere near my normal driving routes. Fill-ups would be a pain. Not to mention, don't plan on going anywhere you can't find E85. Now a flex fuel type 4 with two different fuel maps, maybe even twin plug to allow a little more compression than normal on pump gas, that would be awesome :-) LOL
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MattR
post Dec 8 2006, 12:49 PM
Post #10


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,279
Joined: 23-January 04
From: SF Bay Area
Member No.: 1,589
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Crazyhippy @ Dec 7 2006, 12:52 PM) *

e-85 has less energy per gallon than reg gas, so your mileage will go down.



I just read an SAE paper that said E85 has a 7% advantage on gasoline in specific energy.
edit: specific energy is a measure of energy per WEIGHT, not volume. So you will consume more gallons of gas, but the specific energy is higher, which is how efficiency is measured. Its the same reason audi is winning all endurace races now with the diesel p1 prototype.


To my understanding, the downfall of E85 is politics. I dont mean to make this a political thread, but I've done some research on it. E85, obviously 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline, can be derived from many things. The E85 in the US is made from corn, which takes eight times more energy to produce then sugar. Sugar would be a great alternative. In fact Brazil uses 20% sugar based ethanol in every gallon of gas they pump. The hold up is congress. Domestic sugar is very expensive and tarrifs prevent sugar to be imported as a cost effective alternative. The US has a 54 cent per gallon import tariff on sugar based ethanol to protect corn producers from competition. So, if the US drops the cost of their domestic sugar (which would mean wealthy white men in the sugar industry would take a hit in their pocket book) OR if the US allows foreign sugar based ethanol to be imported at a lesser tariff (which would mean wealthy white men in the corn industry would take a hit in their pocket book), sugar based E85 could be the alternative fuel of choice.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/flag.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th May 2024 - 11:54 AM