Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> I have the parts which should I build?, these are for my spare engines
What would you build?
What would you build?
1911- 66x96, 9to1 cr, 1.7 heads 41x34, vw cam, djet1.7 [ 1 ] ** [8.33%]
1911 as above except w 40dcnf carbs, webcam 86 [ 6 ] ** [50.00%]
2.0 -71x94 7.8 to1 cr 1.7 heads 41x34, vw cam djet1.7 [ 1 ] ** [8.33%]
2.0 as above with 40dcnf carbs, [ 2 ] ** [16.67%]
none of the above, [ 2 ] ** [16.67%]
Total Votes: 12
Guests cannot vote 
2teeners
post Jan 6 2003, 08:27 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Arlington DFW, TX
Member No.: 78



<_<
Cost is an object, I don't want to spend big $$$ but a few hundred is Ok. Looking to build a good street driver. If I could find some 1.8 heads I'd use those, so far no luck.
I plan on enlarging the exhaust ports on the 1.7 to be more like a 2.0 head,

I've never driven a carb'd car, or one without a stock cam. I like low end torque, but an engine that "comes on the cam" a little more than stock would be nice.

So what do you guys think?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Jan 6 2003, 08:21 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Go with the 1911 carbed. They rock. Very smooth engine that like to RPM (short stroke) but has good power up high.

I personally would use 2.0 heads on it... but 1.7 heads with 2.0 sized valves would work almost as well.

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Jan 6 2003, 10:38 PM
Post #3


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,070
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I had a 1.8 w 96 mm P/C's (1911), 40IDF's and a hydraulic lifters (unknown origin and don't know if it still had stock FI cam). LOVED that car. The low end torque was fantastic, but it was still fairly linear to 5500rpm. Should be one of the cheapest options as well.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mueller
post Jan 6 2003, 11:19 PM
Post #4


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 17,146
Joined: 4-January 03
From: Antioch, CA
Member No.: 87
Region Association: None



Ginter,

Did you have that set up in the yellow car that I drove in Texas?

That car did scoot along very nicely, even with both of our big ass's in it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

Mueller
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2teeners
post Jan 7 2003, 12:32 AM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Arlington DFW, TX
Member No.: 78



A mild surprise so far. I thought the 2.0l would be everyone's choice. A rev'r would be fun, and the carbs look so damn cool on it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Jan 7 2003, 12:51 AM
Post #6


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



You said "few hundred"... I dont know of ANY 2.0s that can be had for a few hundred dollars. I would never pick anything but the 2.0... then I would make it a 2056 with the larger 96mm P+C's.

Humm. I know where a good running 2.0 is locally.. carbed for 800$

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gint
post Jan 7 2003, 01:42 PM
Post #7


Mike Ginter
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,070
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Denver CO.
Member No.: 20
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Mueller

Yup, that's the one. Hinkle owns it now.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
2teeners
post Jan 8 2003, 08:22 AM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 79
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Arlington DFW, TX
Member No.: 78



what i meant was I would spend a few hundred more beyond the parts i have to build the motor.

Brad, can you point me to some 71x96 pistons? I've got barrels I can bore if needed. and any deals on 1.8 or 2.0 heads to top it off?

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Brad Roberts
post Jan 8 2003, 04:33 PM
Post #9


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,148
Joined: 23-December 02
Member No.: 8
Region Association: None



Brand new 96's for the 71 crank are something like 350$ or under 300$. Just buy new ones.. dont jack around with cutting 94's to make them 96's. (I know this is what Raby does)

I ran across several sets of 2.0 heads yesterday in my stash. Problem is: I get 400-500$ for them depending on how complete they are. I dont keep cracked ones..

B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Mar 31 2006, 09:32 PM
Post #10


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



read and remember
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th May 2024 - 01:23 AM