Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Engine build Questions
atmadsen914
post Sep 12 2007, 05:44 PM
Post #1


Am I sure I like old cars?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Carlinville IL
Member No.: 8,087
Region Association: Upper MidWest



I see this topic discussed many times before but I seem to be scratching my head every time so I will just post it one more time.

I am doing an engine build up this winter for my ‘73.

I have a 1.7 core. I have a set of rebuilt 2.0L heads. I am looking for a strong daily driver. As with all of these builds there is a cost vs. benefit issue. I am not going to race the car and I do not need a mega hp motor to brag about to the bar buddies. However I don’t want to leave any power on the table. It looks like the KB pistons and the AA cylinders are the right way to go. But size is leaving scratching my head. I know someone told me “size matters and bigger is better” but I am never quite sure!

So I leave it to you guys. I need advice on Piston and Cylinder combos and a cam.


Thanks in advance and sorry for being the 3489 person to post this question.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Sep 12 2007, 07:01 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



Assuming your 1.7L crank is still good just go with the 96mm P/C's. That will give you 1911cc and the 2.0 heads will bolt up to the 96mm cyls. At this point you have to decide if you're going to stay with the stock FI or go with carbs. Then you either work with Jake or someone else on which cam. CR, headers etc. piece of cake! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
atmadsen914
post Sep 12 2007, 08:04 PM
Post #3


Am I sure I like old cars?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Carlinville IL
Member No.: 8,087
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Borderline @ Sep 12 2007, 07:01 PM) *

Assuming your 1.7L crank is still good just go with the 96mm P/C's. That will give you 1911cc and the 2.0 heads will bolt up to the 96mm cyls. At this point you have to decide if you're going to stay with the stock FI or go with carbs. Then you either work with Jake or someone else on which cam. CR, headers etc. piece of cake! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Ok Good advice. I think I am going to go carbs by the way.

Have you run this type of setup?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post Sep 12 2007, 08:21 PM
Post #4


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,641
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



westminster colorado...
thats great
are you on the local 914 yahoo list

I kinda favor that 1911 option
I know gint had one, that did absolutely great at denver altitude
brant

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Sep 12 2007, 09:12 PM
Post #5


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,623
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(atmadsen914 @ Sep 12 2007, 07:04 PM) *

QUOTE(Borderline @ Sep 12 2007, 07:01 PM) *

Assuming your 1.7L crank is still good just go with the 96mm P/C's. That will give you 1911cc and the 2.0 heads will bolt up to the 96mm cyls. At this point you have to decide if you're going to stay with the stock FI or go with carbs. Then you either work with Jake or someone else on which cam. CR, headers etc. piece of cake! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

Ok Good advice. I think I am going to go carbs by the way.

Have you run this type of setup?

I have a 2 liter crank and rods... Hmmm do I see this going to 2 liters??? PM me if your interested.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 13 2007, 08:08 AM
Post #6


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Having the 1.7 core imposes no handicaps on your build- the 1.7 case is universally effective to be made into any other engine combo all the way up to 3 liters.

What limits the possibilities are:
Intended budget
Means of induction (barbs, stock EFI, etc)
Retaining heat exchangers or tosssing them for a full header.


The plan you make now is the most important.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
atmadsen914
post Sep 13 2007, 08:50 AM
Post #7


Am I sure I like old cars?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Carlinville IL
Member No.: 8,087
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(brant @ Sep 12 2007, 08:21 PM) *

westminster colorado...
thats great
are you on the local 914 yahoo list

I kinda favor that 1911 option
I know gint had one, that did absolutely great at denver altitude
brant

I just joined the local list. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
atmadsen914
post Sep 13 2007, 09:00 AM
Post #8


Am I sure I like old cars?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Carlinville IL
Member No.: 8,087
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Sep 13 2007, 08:08 AM) *

Having the 1.7 core imposes no handicaps on your build- the 1.7 case is universally effective to be made into any other engine combo all the way up to 3 liters.

What limits the possibilities are:
Intended budget
Means of induction (barbs, stock EFI, etc)
Retaining heat exchangers or tosssing them for a full header.


The plan you make now is the most important.


And that is my major concern what is planed now will greatly affect the project’s success.

So if I do go with a 2.0 crank and rods (71mm stroke) and carbs. ( I have a line on a set of 40mm webers. ( I am told at my 5200ft 44mm would be to big)

What bore would be good and what cam?

Is going with the bigger crank a big benefit over the 1.7 (66mm stroke)?

Intended budget is something I am trying to plan out now. Jake I have been checking out you site and love what I see!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 13 2007, 09:51 AM
Post #9


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



Like I said, the only limitation is how far your wallet opens for the parts.

The most common combos are the 2056 and the 2270, the 2056 being simplest, cheapest. Whatever you desire, we can create a combo (or already have one) for you.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
atmadsen914
post Sep 13 2007, 10:12 AM
Post #10


Am I sure I like old cars?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Carlinville IL
Member No.: 8,087
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Sep 13 2007, 09:51 AM) *

Like I said, the only limitation is how far your wallet opens for the parts.

The most common combos are the 2056 and the 2270, the 2056 being simplest, cheapest. Whatever you desire, we can create a combo (or already have one) for you.

Ok I will bite. I like the 2270 power. What kind of price would I be looking at for a 2270 vs 2056. I am guessing this isn't the forum for prcing so feel free to pm me if needed.

FYI I am persuing the 2.0 crank and rod set that was offered above.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Sep 13 2007, 10:18 AM
Post #11


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,394
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



I try to keep commercial type piosts away from these other forums.. Feel free to register on my forums and get as much info as you'd ever want or need about pricing and possibilities...

Thats why I set my forums up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
atmadsen914
post Sep 13 2007, 10:35 AM
Post #12


Am I sure I like old cars?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Carlinville IL
Member No.: 8,087
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Sep 13 2007, 10:18 AM) *

I try to keep commercial type piosts away from these other forums.. Feel free to register on my forums and get as much info as you'd ever want or need about pricing and possibilities...

Thats why I set my forums up.

Ok I joined up.

Does anyone out there have opinions on the 1911 or the 2056? Is is a strong runner how is the power of the stock 1.7 setup?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Sep 13 2007, 10:54 AM
Post #13


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,466
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(atmadsen914 @ Sep 13 2007, 12:35 PM) *

Ok I joined up.

Does anyone out there have opinions on the 1911 or the 2056? Is is a strong runner how is the power of the stock 1.7 setup?


Optimally done, ~125 HP at the crank seems to be the goal. Expect somewhere between 110 and 125. Not a lot compared to todays standards, but our cars are lighter, and geared fairly low.

Stock on a 1.7 is ~70HP I think.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 04:28 AM