2.2 from 911 for sale on the samba, link attached |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
2.2 from 911 for sale on the samba, link attached |
jbyron |
Dec 28 2007, 10:44 AM
Post
#1
|
Jamie Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 17-July 07 From: Ballwin, MO Member No.: 7,916 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
|
J P Stein |
Dec 28 2007, 11:07 AM
Post
#2
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
Worth a thousand less.
|
PeeGreen 914 |
Dec 28 2007, 12:31 PM
Post
#3
|
Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol Group: Members Posts: 10,219 Joined: 21-September 06 From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett Member No.: 6,884 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
|
Root_Werks |
Dec 28 2007, 12:57 PM
Post
#4
|
Village Idiot Group: Members Posts: 8,326 Joined: 25-May 04 From: About 5NM from Canada Member No.: 2,105 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
I was thinking that same thing.
|
jbyron |
Dec 29 2007, 10:13 PM
Post
#5
|
Jamie Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 17-July 07 From: Ballwin, MO Member No.: 7,916 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
Really? A 6-cyl & trans can be had for $1,400 ish? I haven't been hanging around these boards very long, but that surprises me.
|
PeeGreen 914 |
Dec 29 2007, 11:33 PM
Post
#6
|
Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol Group: Members Posts: 10,219 Joined: 21-September 06 From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett Member No.: 6,884 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
Really? A 6-cyl & trans can be had for $1,400 ish? I haven't been hanging around these boards very long, but that surprises me. If it is like that one is yes. The 2.2 really isn't very special. Now if it was a true 914-6 engine or a 2.7 or 2.4 or something else the price may be more true. However, Zenith's aren't great, 2.2 not great, not much to offer here. I'd rather have a 2.0l four than that. |
J P Stein |
Dec 30 2007, 07:57 AM
Post
#7
|
Irrelevant old fart Group: Members Posts: 8,797 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Vancouver, WA Member No.: 45 Region Association: None |
It pays to *know* your 9eleben engines before you even think about buying one.
This is especially true of one you can't see & hear run. Just because it has Porsche on the cam covers doesn't mean it's gold. |
BK911 |
Dec 31 2007, 01:54 PM
Post
#8
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 672 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Rocky Top, TN Member No.: 1,674 Region Association: None |
If you take a 2.2T engine and add a 2.4 crank and rods, you get a 2.4T with slightly higher compression than a 2.4S. It will be a very nice street engine. Add an E cam and you have an engine that will just flat out haul butt.
But don't tell anybody because I like being able to buy these cheap. Shhhhh. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) |
Eric_Shea |
Dec 31 2007, 02:11 PM
Post
#9
|
PMB Performance Group: Admin Posts: 19,275 Joined: 3-September 03 From: Salt Lake City, UT Member No.: 1,110 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
QUOTE But don't tell anybody because I like being able to buy these cheap. Shhhhh. Not cheap to repair all the carnage when the T pistons go slamming into the valves. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
degreeoff |
Dec 31 2007, 02:51 PM
Post
#10
|
I like big butts and I can not lie! Group: Members Posts: 1,622 Joined: 9-February 03 From: Booowieeee MD (near DC) Member No.: 275 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) Yeah I was about to say ..... don't you have to add things like pistons/cylinders to that mix?
|
Eric_Shea |
Dec 31 2007, 03:14 PM
Post
#11
|
PMB Performance Group: Admin Posts: 19,275 Joined: 3-September 03 From: Salt Lake City, UT Member No.: 1,110 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Shhhhhhhh don't tell anybody! (that's adds another 2 grand.5 not to mention the case will only hold up to that kind of punishment for about 2 years, not to worry, rebuilding 911 motors is cheap!) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
|
brant |
Dec 31 2007, 04:05 PM
Post
#12
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,628 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
yeah...
really cheap... except for that 5K rebuild bill... it will be really cheap |
woobn8r |
Dec 31 2007, 04:23 PM
Post
#13
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 607 Joined: 7-January 07 From: Newmarket, Ontario, Canada Member No.: 7,435 Region Association: None |
Small displacement 911 core motors go regularly around here for about $1000.
901 trans...$800-$1000, 915 trans(mag case) $1500-$1800, (15 aluminum case) $1800-$2300 S. |
BK911 |
Dec 31 2007, 04:56 PM
Post
#14
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 672 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Rocky Top, TN Member No.: 1,674 Region Association: None |
QUOTE But don't tell anybody because I like being able to buy these cheap. Shhhhh. Not cheap to repair all the carnage when the T pistons go slamming into the valves. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I wish you would have told me that before I built one and beat the heck out of it AX and DE for several years in a 70T Targa. I knew these engines were tough, but to last several seasons with the valves hitting the pistons? Wow, I have a new respect for them now. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) Stroking a 2.2T might give about 150ish hp. A stock 2.2S is 180. I'm pretty sure the S engine cases lasted more than 2 years. No, you don't have to swap out the P/C's. You can add 2.2 pistons to a 2.4 for a bump in CR, or you can stoke a 2.2 to a 2.4 using just the 2.4 crank and rods. To go with an S cam you need to machine the pistons. With an E cam you definitely need to check, but I can't remember if the valve pockets need machining. Remember, this is our little secret! Happy new year!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sheeplove.gif) |
911quest |
Dec 31 2007, 05:44 PM
Post
#15
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 277 Joined: 26-March 06 From: Louisville Ky Member No.: 5,773 Region Association: South East States |
All parts are considered cores unless proven otherwise....
this is the people's court. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) |
Eric_Shea |
Dec 31 2007, 06:54 PM
Post
#16
|
PMB Performance Group: Admin Posts: 19,275 Joined: 3-September 03 From: Salt Lake City, UT Member No.: 1,110 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
QUOTE but I can't remember if the valve pockets need machining. They do. So much so that two reputable engine builders I'd spoken with recommended against it. It leaves the piston dome dangerously thin. I had a 2.2 and a 2.4 and researched this combo extensively. |
brant |
Dec 31 2007, 07:16 PM
Post
#17
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,628 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
Also, people should know that putting the higher compression 2.2 pistons (T, E, or S) does not raise the actual working compression as much as is thought.
In theory it would raise compression over 1 point (1.5 as I remember) but in Actual use it is much less than that and closer to only 1/2 point. so that 2.4T with the 2.2T pistons is actually only slightly more compression than stock and no free lunch rebuilding any 911 motor (even a stock 2.0T) is an expensive proposition if your going to rebuild a 2.2 you can probably rebuild a 2.7 for nearly the same parts and labor all motors not currently running are really just cores until you open them up and prove otherwise. Lots of times they can be started and used, but its really an unsafe gamble and I'd rather spend an extra thousand up front for a known runner than roll the dice. |
BK911 |
Dec 31 2007, 08:13 PM
Post
#18
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 672 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Rocky Top, TN Member No.: 1,674 Region Association: None |
A 2.2T piston has a little more displaced volume than a 2.4S piston. The dome is about the same but less valve pocket. So a 2.2T piston in a 2.4 will give a slightly higher CR as a 2.4S. This isn't something I read, it is something I measured in the shop. Add .5 for 2.2E and 1.0 for 2.2S. I had a spreadsheet with all the measurements but I can't find it now.
So a 2.4S has 8.5:1, 2.2T pistons on a 2.4 crank will give ~8.6 2.2E ~ 9.1:1 2.2S ~ 9.6:1 BA performance handbook states a measured 9.66:1 with 2.2S pistons and 2.4 crank. So I think my measurements are pretty close. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I am heading downtown. I hope everybody has a nice and safe new years eve and new year. Later. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th May 2024 - 01:18 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |