Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Trans ratio, 914/4 versus 6
retrotech
post Jan 9 2004, 11:13 PM
Post #1


retrotech
**

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 2-November 03
From: Mosier, Oregon
Member No.: 1,302



Can some one tell me the difference between 4 cyl. ratios & 6 cyl. Basically are the gears raios closer on which one? Which has the lower ratio, ie lower max speed per gear.

Thanks
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 5)
redshift
post Jan 9 2004, 11:47 PM
Post #2


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



From memory...

/4: A, F, N, V, ZD

/6: A, GA, O, V, ZA.. I think..


The 6 has a GA mainshaft, 2,3 are higher, 5 is lower, obviously.


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
retrotech
post Jan 9 2004, 11:54 PM
Post #3


retrotech
**

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 2-November 03
From: Mosier, Oregon
Member No.: 1,302



So if you were running a 6, with 4 gear ratios, wouldn't that be good? Closer, lower, mid range gears with more torque, and a longer [higher rpm] 5th gear.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
retrotech
post Jan 9 2004, 11:55 PM
Post #4


retrotech
**

Group: Members
Posts: 470
Joined: 2-November 03
From: Mosier, Oregon
Member No.: 1,302



Or did I get that just back wards?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
redshift
post Jan 9 2004, 11:58 PM
Post #5


Bless the Hell out of you!
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,926
Joined: 29-June 03
Member No.: 869



Hey, found what I was looking for, and my memory works!

http://members.rennlist.com/chuxter/901&915ratios.htm

Changing either car, to the other's transaxle (stock) would not be a huge change.

If you have MS Excel, you can d/l the ratios.xls, and play with speeds_in_gears.

I deleted all the rpm cols. except for 3500-4500 and redline.


M
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
campbellcj
post Jan 10 2004, 12:56 AM
Post #6


I can't Re Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,545
Joined: 26-December 02
From: Agoura, CA
Member No.: 21
Region Association: Southern California



What's good for you, gearing wise, largely depends on 3 variables:

1) What you mostly use the car for, i.e. autox, tt/race, or street
2) What flavor of six you have, i.e. a high-revving small displacement or a 3.8 torque monster
3) Your tire height/circumference. Short tires have an effect of shortening gearing, and vice versa.

For my purposes (track) the stock -4 gearing was off. It was fine for street driving but did not allow good use of the powerband in canyon carving or track events.

I recall that John Rogers found exactly the same thing, but we have slightly different gears in our new gearboxen...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2024 - 10:01 AM