Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Engine Bay Fuel Hoses - HP?, Need short answer to an old question
AvalonFal
post Jun 11 2008, 07:23 AM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 3-July 05
From: Southern New Jersey Coast
Member No.: 4,367
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Asking everyone's patience on an old question -- A search turned up a lot of info on fuel hose, but I couldn't find the short answer -- Are all of the fuel hoses in the engine bay from the plastic supply line and back to the plastic return line high pressure hose, or if not, what's the combination??

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
flat4
post Jun 11 2008, 07:31 AM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 120
Joined: 13-December 07
From: Australia
Member No.: 8,459



QUOTE(AvalonFal @ Jun 11 2008, 05:23 AM) *

Asking everyone's patience on an old question -- A search turned up a lot of info on fuel hose, but I couldn't find the short answer -- Are all of the fuel hoses in the engine bay from the plastic supply line and back to the plastic return line high pressure hose, or if not, what's the combination??

Paul


Before the pump and after the regulator the pressure will be somewhat lower, but at a price difference of a dollar a foot I didn't bother trying to save the money and went HP everywhere.

Cheers, Steve
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dave_Darling
post Jun 11 2008, 09:38 AM
Post #3


914 Idiot
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 14,985
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Silicon Valley / Kailua-Kona
Member No.: 121
Region Association: Northern California



Use high pressure hose for all fuel lines. Not worth the risk of mixing up high- and low-pressure stuff.

--DD
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
AvalonFal
post Jun 11 2008, 12:13 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 483
Joined: 3-July 05
From: Southern New Jersey Coast
Member No.: 4,367
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Dave_Darling @ Jun 11 2008, 11:38 AM) *

Use high pressure hose for all fuel lines. Not worth the risk of mixing up high- and low-pressure stuff.

--DD



Yes, I agree. Just was curious if there were different hose types originally.

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Jun 11 2008, 12:40 PM
Post #5


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



QUOTE(AvalonFal @ Jun 11 2008, 11:13 AM) *

QUOTE(Dave_Darling @ Jun 11 2008, 11:38 AM) *

Use high pressure hose for all fuel lines. Not worth the risk of mixing up high- and low-pressure stuff.

--DD



Yes, I agree. Just was curious if there were different hose types originally.

Paul


No. One grade of fuel line, in 2 sizes, is used throughout the car. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dbgriffith75
post Jun 11 2008, 01:10 PM
Post #6


TheGrif
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 25-July 07
From: Iowa, USA
Member No.: 7,945
Region Association: Upper MidWest



On a somewhat related note, and unfortunately I don't have pics to show you, but there's a breather line (at least I think that's what it is) that runs from the tank, back through the tunnel and into the engine compartment w/ the fuel lines. The one I pulled from my '75 2.0 was plastic, about 1/8" OD- but it wasn't hooked up to anything back in the engine compartment, it was just hanging there (broken off from the looks of it) and I didn't see any place where it could have hooked up to the engine.

Any ideas on what it was for, and where it might hook up? I'm thinking it might have been something FI related, and since this engine was converted to dual carbs, it's now obselete, but I'd like to be sure.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Jun 11 2008, 01:13 PM
Post #7


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



EVAP line. Hooks up to the small nipple on the EVAP canister in the engine compartment on a '75/'76 car. Early cars run the 2 12mm hoses to the front, where the canister sits atop the tank, and the small hose is just a few inches long. The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cevan
post Jun 11 2008, 01:27 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,079
Joined: 11-December 06
From: Western Massachusetts
Member No.: 7,351



It's a gas tank vent line. For your '75, there was a charcoal cannister mounted in the engine bay that the line plugged into. There are two vacuum lines attached to the cannister so that the fumes got sucked into the cannister and out into the intake boot. Older cars had the cannister mounted up front by the gas tank.

There is a debate as to whether to keep the cannisters as they are at least 32 years old and some would say the charcoal inside is no longer active.

I did not re-install mine when I put my motor back in, although I kept the cannister and accompanying vacuum lines. I zip-tied the vent line to the passenger side e-brake cable.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Allan
post Jun 11 2008, 01:31 PM
Post #9


Teenerless Weenie
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,373
Joined: 5-July 04
From: Western Mesopotamia
Member No.: 2,304
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Jun 11 2008, 12:13 PM) *

EVAP line.



QUOTE(Cevan @ Jun 11 2008, 12:27 PM) *

It's a gas tank vent line.


Are you guys sure it's not just the return fuel line?

He did say that the car was converted to carbs...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ericread
post Jun 11 2008, 01:50 PM
Post #10


The Viper Blue 914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,177
Joined: 7-December 07
From: Irvine, CA (The OC)
Member No.: 8,432
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Headrage @ Jun 11 2008, 12:31 PM) *

QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Jun 11 2008, 12:13 PM) *

EVAP line.



QUOTE(Cevan @ Jun 11 2008, 12:27 PM) *

It's a gas tank vent line.


Are you guys sure it's not just the return fuel line?

He did say that the car was converted to carbs...


Yep - it's the eval line. The return fuel line would never route through a charcoal cannister.

Eric
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dbgriffith75
post Jun 13 2008, 10:58 AM
Post #11


TheGrif
***

Group: Members
Posts: 509
Joined: 25-July 07
From: Iowa, USA
Member No.: 7,945
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Now that you mentioned charcoal canister, it seemed kinda obvious. Had one of those "duh" moments.

Anyway, I don't need to debate whether or not to keep mine... because the PO already seemed to make that decision as there wasn't one on it when I bought the car. I guess I'll just run a new line for it too since I'm running new feul lines thru the tunnel anyway, and just tie it off somewhere back there so if the next owner wants to try and install a new one, they're set up for it.

Thanks for the advice.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th May 2024 - 04:03 PM