Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> suzuki 1.8 conversion, conversion engine swap
jamie74
post Jun 8 2009, 08:13 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-June 09
From: Toronto
Member No.: 10,437
Region Association: None



Anyone ever put a Suzuki motor in a 914? Specifically the engine from a 2000 Suzuki Esteem. 1.8 litre 122 hp.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies(1 - 11)
Cap'n Krusty
post Jun 8 2009, 08:15 PM
Post #2


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



All that work for 30 HP? The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Todd Enlund
post Jun 8 2009, 08:27 PM
Post #3


Resident Photoshop Guru
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,251
Joined: 24-August 07
From: Laurelhurst (Portland), Oregon
Member No.: 8,032
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(Cap'n Krusty @ Jun 8 2009, 06:15 PM) *

All that work for 30 HP? The Cap'n

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

That a lot of work for performance that could easily be obtained from the Type IV.

If you're going to swap, make it worth while.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimkelly
post Jun 8 2009, 08:40 PM
Post #4


Delaware USA
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,969
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Delaware, USA
Member No.: 2,460
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



watercooled choices are small block chevy or subaru - everything else is against the law in all 52 states : )
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rick 918-S
post Jun 8 2009, 08:41 PM
Post #5


Hey nice rack! -Celette
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,462
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Now in Superior WI
Member No.: 43
Region Association: Northstar Region



Save that Esteem engine for the British cars. The 914 engine is just as good as that Esteem engine and your not raising the roll center, adding cooling problems and messing with an otherwise well designed car for very little HP gain.

Did I just type that.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/screwy.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)

Oh and (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dlo914
post Jun 9 2009, 01:41 AM
Post #6


Whatchu' lookin' at?!?!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,432
Joined: 6-September 04
From: San Gabriel, CA
Member No.: 2,697



If you're gonna with an inline 4 motor, i'd go with the Toyota 2zzge out of the Celica GTS, which is a 1.8L Inline 4 that is pushing around 190hp and redlining @ 7600rpm. Or you could go with the older Toyota 3sgte, which is a turbo'd 2.0L that ranged from 225-245hp depending on if it was an early or late model. But yeah in general if you're gonna go with an inline 4 i'd stick with a Toyota motor. Plain and simple they're reliable, rev happy, easy to fix, and easy to find parts for.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rotary'14
post Jun 9 2009, 07:11 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 24-April 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 3,977



I seem to recall a suzuki conversion with the radiator in the back, mounted right next to the engine. It had an improvised engine tin that provided a place for the radiator to sit. The engine, radiator, and trans was all removed together when the engine was dropped. It was a very clean installation with (I think) absolutely no cutting of any trunks. I'd love to see more info too. I bet such a motor would get 40+ mpg in our little cars. A great daily driver conversion.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)


jamie74 I wish you good luck with your project, be sure to post pics.
-Rob

edit: I just found some pics that Brant posted a while back.


Attached image(s)
Attached Image Attached Image Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
craig3x
post Jun 9 2009, 06:54 PM
Post #8


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 106
Joined: 18-April 09
From: Sacramento
Member No.: 10,275
Region Association: None



QUOTE(jimkelly @ Jun 8 2009, 07:40 PM) *

watercooled choices are small block chevy or subaru - everything else is against the law in all 52 states : )


You must not be familiar with rotary power. 10,000 rpms and smooth as butta. Not to mention smaller and lighter than a type IV. Rotors go round and round which keeps vibration minimal compared to up and down motion of a piston engine. Or in the type IV case....side to side. Don't get me wrong, I still love the type IVs
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RON S.
post Jun 10 2009, 05:46 AM
Post #9


9140430841, FINALLY RUNNING
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,212
Joined: 22-May 03
From: WALTERBORO,S.C.
Member No.: 724
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(Rotary'14 @ Jun 9 2009, 06:11 AM) *

I seem to recall a suzuki conversion with the radiator in the back, mounted right next to the engine. It had an improvised engine tin that provided a place for the radiator to sit. The engine, radiator, and trans was all removed together when the engine was dropped. It was a very clean installation with (I think) absolutely no cutting of any trunks. I'd love to see more info too. I bet such a motor would get 40+ mpg in our little cars. A great daily driver conversion.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)


jamie74 I wish you good luck with your project, be sure to post pics.
-Rob

edit: I just found some pics that Brant posted a while back.



A Geo Metro motor in a 914. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)

Whats the point??? the Geo as it sits still weighs less than the 914 even with that conversion. Plus if you want a Geo that bad, and I own 2 currently, you can usually buy one for less than 2 grand and save yourself all that hassle making something work.

JM2CW,

Ron
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jamie74
post Jun 11 2009, 03:15 PM
Post #10


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6
Joined: 5-June 09
From: Toronto
Member No.: 10,437
Region Association: None



QUOTE(RON S. @ Jun 10 2009, 03:46 AM) *

QUOTE(Rotary'14 @ Jun 9 2009, 06:11 AM) *

I seem to recall a suzuki conversion with the radiator in the back, mounted right next to the engine. It had an improvised engine tin that provided a place for the radiator to sit. The engine, radiator, and trans was all removed together when the engine was dropped. It was a very clean installation with (I think) absolutely no cutting of any trunks. I'd love to see more info too. I bet such a motor would get 40+ mpg in our little cars. A great daily driver conversion.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png)


jamie74 I wish you good luck with your project, be sure to post pics.
-Rob

edit: I just found some pics that Brant posted a while back.



A Geo Metro motor in a 914. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wacko.gif)

Whats the point??? the Geo as it sits still weighs less than the 914 even with that conversion. Plus if you want a Geo that bad, and I own 2 currently, you can usually buy one for less than 2 grand and save yourself all that hassle making something work.

JM2CW,

Ron


actually its a more powerful engine then the Geo - an Esteem with 122 hp
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BKLA
post Jun 11 2009, 04:58 PM
Post #11


Really old member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,253
Joined: 14-August 05
From: OR
Member No.: 4,590
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



When I read "suzuki" - I thought Hayabusa. Specifically, the Harley 1.4 litre, 175 HP
version. The V8 - even more so....

I think this would be the hot rod of the century in a 914!

http://www.h1v8.com/H2.html

Attached Image

Damn... I was really hoping someone was committing to one of these!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Todd Enlund
post Jun 11 2009, 06:26 PM
Post #12


Resident Photoshop Guru
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,251
Joined: 24-August 07
From: Laurelhurst (Portland), Oregon
Member No.: 8,032
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(BKLA @ Jun 11 2009, 02:58 PM) *

When I read "suzuki" - I thought Hayabusa. Specifically, the Harley 1.4 litre, 175 HP
version. The V8 - even more so....

I think this would be the hot rod of the century in a 914!


The Hartley V-8 is my dream engine in a 914. Lots of revs, plenty of power, and not enough torque to be a serious issue with a 901.

Getting a 4 cyl Busa engine to work in a teener would probably require a serious regearing of the tranny. Lots of HP, but very little torque.

You'll probably be looking at a rebuild every 15-20,000 miles too. That's fine for a toy car though.

I want to put a Busa engine in a Sprite.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th May 2024 - 10:42 PM