Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What Would Joseph Do ?, Joes 2056
Joes 2056
Which one would you do and why??
1.8 case with L-jet [ 2 ] ** [6.90%]
2.0 case with D-jet [ 16 ] ** [55.17%]
1.8 case w/ Carbs [ 6 ] ** [20.69%]
2.0 case w/ carbs [ 5 ] ** [17.24%]
Total Votes: 29
Guests cannot vote 
jsayre914
post Jul 31 2009, 12:50 PM
Post #1


Speed Up !!!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,188
Joined: 10-February 08
From: Timonium MD 21093
Member No.: 8,696
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



It is my dream to purchase a kit from jake. I have multiple engines i could build from. If you had these four choices what would you pick and why??

this car is a daily driver year round with aggressive" street driving. Mostly highway. Needs to be reliable and cost effective. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cupomeat
post Jul 31 2009, 12:56 PM
Post #2


missing my NY 914 in VA
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,336
Joined: 26-November 07
From: Oakton VA
Member No.: 8,376
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Sorry, I voted before I fully understood the question.

Generally, I would preserve the 2.0L with D-Jet and the 1.8 with L-Jet and rebuild the 1.8 with Carbs.

The 2.0 with D-jet is a fine motor and the 1.8 with L-jet is getting tough to find a working one.

You will always find engines with Carbs as so many of us have ditched FI (at one point) for good or bad reasons.

So, I say the 1.8 with Carbs.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
blackmoon
post Jul 31 2009, 01:10 PM
Post #3


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 27-May 08
From: Cal Bay Area
Member No.: 9,106
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Cupomeat @ Jul 31 2009, 11:56 AM) *

Sorry, I voted before I fully understood the question.

Generally, I would preserve the 2.0L with D-Jet and the 1.8 with L-Jet and rebuild the 1.8 with Carbs.

The 2.0 with D-jet is a fine motor and the 1.8 with L-jet is getting tough to find a working one.

You will always find engines with Carbs as so many of us have ditched FI (at one point) for good or bad reasons.

So, I say the 1.8 with Carbs.



I went with the 2270 kit (in progress) with carb's from Jake. Eventually and some more money, I will convert back to aftermaket fuel injection system, my 2-bits
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Jul 31 2009, 01:14 PM
Post #4


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



The 2.0 d-jet has good spunk and it "Needs to be reliable and cost effective." is your best bet.

The 2.0 carbs will have more spunk with a cam, headwork, valvetrain, oil pump, header, etc. Mileage might go down a bit, heavy foot a quite bit more....no cam it will be worse than d-jet.

Working L-jet, I got one here, original to my teen. I may never use it again, but I'm keeping it because it is "correct".

1.8 carb can be made a screamer. It could be the better case for a 2.0 build, unless you're anal about having a GA code case.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
carlilg
post Jul 31 2009, 01:14 PM
Post #5


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 6-June 07
From: socal
Member No.: 7,790



I just bought a 1.7 as a core and plan to do a 2270 with that and save the 2.0 D-Jet that is in the car, as it is a bone stock '73 2.0, and I hate to do anything to a clean original car that can't be undone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jul 31 2009, 01:26 PM
Post #6


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,444
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Neither of Joes current engines are in running shape currently. They are both excellent rebuildable cores though.


A kit from Jake will have new heads (I think that they all feature that now) so it really does not matter which engine you use. So I would use the 1.8 as the core and sell the 2.0 as seed money.

Oh, and EFI that will work with a 2270 or a fast 2056 will set up back a pretty penny. I say carbs.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zymurgist
post Jul 31 2009, 01:46 PM
Post #7


"Ace" Mechanic
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,411
Joined: 9-June 05
From: Hagerstown, MD
Member No.: 4,238
Region Association: None



I'm a 2.0 D-Jet fan, because that's what I know. However, if I were planning on doing a Jake kit, I would go with carbs, because that's what Jake recommends.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hcdmueller
post Jul 31 2009, 02:09 PM
Post #8


?????????????
***

Group: Members
Posts: 542
Joined: 4-February 06
From: UK
Member No.: 5,527
Region Association: England



If you want a reliable daily driver and have working stock injection D or L jet go with a 2056 kit with the cam that allows the stock injection. Carbs need adjustment regularly. I am not that great with carbs and don't want to mess with them all the time. I will be going to EFI as soon as I can. Even a 2056 with stock injection is a huge improvement.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Todd Enlund
post Jul 31 2009, 03:09 PM
Post #9


Resident Photoshop Guru
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,251
Joined: 24-August 07
From: Laurelhurst (Portland), Oregon
Member No.: 8,032
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Joe, I think you might want to rephrase your question.

My understanding is: Which of the 4 would you sacrifice for a rebuild? I chose the 1.8 carbed engine, because it is worth the least. The only catch is, I believe that you need a 2.0 crank as a core for one of Jake's kits.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Jul 31 2009, 03:22 PM
Post #10


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



if you are getting a kit, then are you going back to stock 2.0 displacement or going to 2056/2270?

if you are going back to stock, then stock, 2.0 Djet is the way to go...

if you are getting a kit to make it more than 2.0... either CASE will work... they are the same.

the heads are not, tho.

I'd probably use the 1.8 case, 1.8 heads(ports opened and spark plug position changed)... on a 2270 or 2056 with carbs and better than stock cam... then later build a stock rebuild of your 2.0 with djet for "authenticity"


I think jake even builds a 2056 kit that uses the stock Djet... but I'm not sure about that.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jsayre914
post Jul 31 2009, 04:31 PM
Post #11


Speed Up !!!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,188
Joined: 10-February 08
From: Timonium MD 21093
Member No.: 8,696
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Thanks for your input..

in response to the questions: I am trying to keep cost down, and i really like fuel injection alot (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) i would be willing to sacrifice a little power but i want to get my monies worth out of the kit.

i no longer have d-jet, i sold it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/chair.gif) i do not have carbs either

what i have is this, and anything eles i would be paying out of pocket:


>complete running 1.8 with l-jet.
>2.0 running minus the djet

i am not worried about putting this car back to originality. Im not worried about engine codes etc. Im just having fun with it. I have never experienced carbs, my understanding is they need a lot of tweeking and they dont like winter.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tat2dphreak
post Jul 31 2009, 04:38 PM
Post #12


stoya, stoya, stoya
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 8,797
Joined: 6-June 03
From: Wylie, TX
Member No.: 792
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE
I have never experienced carbs, my understanding is they need a lot of tweeking and they dont like winter



I'll say "no, not really" and "true"

they don't really take much tweaking once you get them right. but they don't dig on cold either.

if you like FI, go FI, and if you don't care about originality, go with a megasquirt and mark's distributorless ignition.... you either have to learn FI or learn carbs, may as well go with the one that is more future-proof.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
type47
post Jul 31 2009, 04:46 PM
Post #13


Viermeister
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,254
Joined: 7-August 03
From: Vienna, VA
Member No.: 994
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



You don't offer my choice: 2056 with microsquirt (or some digital FI system). Ditch the antiquated D-jet system and be a pioneer into the digital world. At least then I will be able to learn from your install as this is my plan.... after I get the roller rolling, after I finish the kitchen, after I get the Vanagon back on the road for a DD, after I get the walkway finished, after I get the planning for the MAMER/ECC, get the picture? in 2020! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jul 31 2009, 04:49 PM
Post #14


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



If you choose your camshaft correctly, and choose your injectors correctly...L-jet can be setup to support a much larger motor.
So can D-jet.

So, I would say go up to the 2056 and run the L-jet FI system that you have....you will want to get a NEW set of 2.0 liter injectors...all the rest will be the same.

This is not bench engineering...its just a fact. Both systems can and do support larger motors with a little bit of proper tuning.
You own the Ljet FI system, so use that...


Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Owensby
post Jul 31 2009, 05:25 PM
Post #15


JoeO
***

Group: Members
Posts: 527
Joined: 7-January 06
From: Spartanburg, SC
Member No.: 5,385
Region Association: South East States



Whichever way you decide- make sure that you have the correct cam. The cams for the carbed engines do not idle as well on a FI system. The FI cams do not give the full benefit to the carbs. Needs to be a system. JoeO
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr Evil
post Jul 31 2009, 05:51 PM
Post #16


Send me your transmission!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 22,999
Joined: 21-November 03
From: Loveland, OH 45140
Member No.: 1,372
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I think you need a 2.0 cam for the kit, no?

Joe should not to anything other than a stock FI system as he is not familiar with high tech stuff like that. Maybe in the future, if I have time. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)

I would go with the 2.0 made to a 2056 or 2270. Sell the heads, pistons and cylinders off of it. As well as any other parts you need. You can use an L-jet system to run these engines, and L-jet is even considered by many to be a better system when it is maintained.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jul 31 2009, 05:57 PM
Post #17


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



The camshaft can actually have a little bit more overlap.
Not to much because it creates air flutter in the plenum that actually closes the flapper door on the Air Meter.

Ljet is not better than Djet...at least not using that antique Air meter box.

Still, use it, it will work quite well.
You can use the heads from either a 2.0 liter or a 1.8 liter motor.
You can buy the kit and have a snappy little 2056.

Jake has a perfect FI cam for this...its not stock, but people have had good results with it.

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sww914
post Aug 1 2009, 02:22 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,439
Joined: 4-June 06
Member No.: 6,146
Region Association: None



If it were me and money was short, I'd plug in the running 1.8 to drive it around and build a carb'd cammed 2056 screamer later. If the money isn't too different so you get quite a few more HP for not too much more money I'd go with a screamer 2270. I haven't priced Jake's kits lately because I'm not building a hot 4 cyl for awhile unless something bad happens to my anemic, perfectly reliable 1.7 that gets 30mpg.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dw914er
post Aug 1 2009, 02:32 AM
Post #19


Planning Cities
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,364
Joined: 1-March 08
From: Yucaipa, CA
Member No.: 8,763
Region Association: Southern California



I would probably sacrifice the 1.8 core if you were going to have Jake build it for you, though Steve's suggestion isn't bad either. I personally like the stock FI unit, only issues ive had was a leak when i first started getting the car running after a few years of sitting, and a points issue. But since then, its been solid, reliable, good in warm, cold, etc. But if your kicking up the hp a notch, a aftermarket fi unit or carbs is probably the way to go. But i figure if its Jake's motor/kit, he will know what will be best to do.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Aug 1 2009, 09:03 AM
Post #20


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,588
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



I don't understand. Are you asking us which engine you should build or which core you should build from?

Plenty of smiles to be had from a 2056. I think Rich D in the Washington area has a very nicely built one for sale too...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 05:56 PM