Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Specs on stock 2.0 cam, looking.....
Sleepin
post Aug 5 2009, 09:52 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,647
Joined: 20-November 07
From: Grand Junction, Co.
Member No.: 8,357
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I searched, and could not find..... does anyone have the specs on a stock 2.0L cam?

Thanks,

Eric
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Aug 5 2009, 09:57 PM
Post #2


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,574
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



Its in the haynes manual...sorry mine is in the shop

Rich
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
TravisNeff
post Aug 5 2009, 10:13 PM
Post #3


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,082
Joined: 20-March 03
From: Mesa, AZ
Member No.: 447
Region Association: Southwest Region



valve timing from Haynes:

intake opens at 12 degrees BTDC
intake closes at 42 degrees ABDC
exhaust opens at 43 degrees BBDC
exhaust closes at 4 degrees ATDC
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jcd914
post Aug 5 2009, 10:27 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,081
Joined: 7-February 08
From: Sacramento, CA
Member No.: 8,684
Region Association: Northern California



Not that this answers your question but here it is
I was told that the actual cam specs (the profile the cam was ground to) changed several times during the life of the 914 but the part number never changed. The changes were for emissions compliance and earlier cams had a better performance profile than latter cams. I don't know any of this for fact and I have always placed cam choice in the hands of a professional I trusted. In the past that was Elgin cams but I would probably consult with Jake if I were building and engine today.

Jim
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe Ricard
post Aug 6 2009, 06:02 AM
Post #5


CUMONIWANNARACEU
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,811
Joined: 5-January 03
From: Gautier, MS
Member No.: 92



There is only one reason to keep the stock Cam in a motor. and that would be to stay in stock class in SCCA.

I think this would be a stupid desicion.

If you want to drive and enjoy the car and you are not racing it in sanctioned events then one of Raby's cams will fit your needs. Will run cooler make more power and probably get better MPG.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ME733
post Aug 7 2009, 11:12 AM
Post #6


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 842
Joined: 25-June 08
From: Atlanta Ga.
Member No.: 9,209
Region Association: South East States



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) well ...would you consider, in your recommendation, that a stock cam is stupid....wheather or not , this person intends to use the O.E.M. fuel injection setup.?..A camshaft with too much overlap,causes , pulsations, in the intake runners, which the intake AIR flapper (controlling fuel delivery) interpets as ...(need more fuel,need less fuel) as the pulsations bounce the flaper back and fourth.).this can be a serious problem at idle...Consider?.. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) .
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
eric914
post Aug 7 2009, 03:26 PM
Post #7


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 381
Joined: 28-January 04
From: Waynesville OH
Member No.: 1,613
Region Association: Upper MidWest



Call Jake up. He has a replacement for the stock cam that plays nice with the fuel injection and gives a bump in performance.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cap'n Krusty
post Aug 7 2009, 05:45 PM
Post #8


Cap'n Krusty
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 10,794
Joined: 24-June 04
From: Santa Maria, CA
Member No.: 2,246
Region Association: Central California



While I have no experience with Jake's cam, I can tell you that the WebCam replacement for the stock cam (not their stock regrind) is CRAP...... They say the little mod they made gives you more power and will run fine, but you have MAJOR idle emission problems and a huge flat spot off idle. Go with Jake, go stock, but avoid cams that they say will give your more power and work just like stock.

The Cap'n
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2024 - 08:55 PM