Well someone fuched up a nice car.

That thing is fugly.

John

UGH !!!!! DOUBLE UGH !!!!!

That was me trying to post the last 3 pics. Not sure what happened.

The yellow slant nose might look better without the rear window slats. It looked to be nicely done.

The red one is mine doing the AX with an instructor. Forgot to deflate tires for the ride home. Thing rode like a tank.

I like it! I bet it goes fast.

Owner told me it is an original six. It's also for sale 25k. Not my style either. One weird thing is the complete engine lid & trunk lid are still under the louver panel. He wanted to copy a Ferrari F40.

I looked at the car. It is not an original six. It has a 475 VIN number.

That's a relief. Still, why ruin a 914 to tell the world you have a tiny winkie.

He was unsuccessful.

He told me it was an original 6, and I pointed immediately to the vin tag and said, "they didn't make the 6 in 75...or ever with a vin that starts with a '4' "

He didn't respond.

I can appreciate the engineering that went into the back window, trunk, and engine bay. They all opened up real nicely. The interior was also clean and nice.

It's not my cup of tea, and I imagine he's going to have a lot of problems finding a buyer at 25k

I think the window looks identical to a late 80's Camaro.

While we are on the subject of "why do that". Here is another one.

Strosek has made a lot of money building those things. Then again so did DP, and Gemballa.



there's no accounting for taste

Sending more pics. The next one was at the AX.

Camera couldn't keep up w Paul's car

Group thank you for all the teener's votes.

The Beast

if anyone wants a picture, PM me your email.

if anyone wants a picture, PM me your email.

Look at them BUBs on that orange car furthest in the background... They gotta go