Looking at the muffler I have to admit there is a challenge here, but it would be nice to pull air out from beneath the car and to generate downforce without resorting to an actual spoiler. I don't see them,so am wondering if it is a cSe of beating your head against the wall. I followed after a nice example on a 944 last weekend. Engine is in the front and I don't know if it helps. Not interested in posing, I want to suck air and shoot it upwards. Pointers would be welcome.
Elliot Cannon
Oct 7 2014, 01:18 AM
If you want true down force at the rear, you need a wing. A spoiler decays lift and doesn't necessarily provide down force. It's been my experience that the 914 (at least mine) at speed needs more down force in the front. Diffusers I know absolutely nothing about.
maf914
Oct 7 2014, 06:02 AM
There is an article in the October 2014 issue of Excellence magazine with a nice orange 1977 air cooled 911 set up for track days. It has a full rear under floor with diffuser. It looks good, but the article doesn't really go into detail about the performance of the diffuser or cooling issues with the engine.
I remember reading that the Porsche factory and Porsche customer teams had to make compromises with the 956/962 cars under floors and diffusers. Completely enclosed for max down force during qualifying or open louvers to allow airflow for engine cooling during the race. The air cooled engine configuration, as well as the flat six arrangement, was a liability. With water cooled engines the heat could be managed in other ways without compromising the diffuser and under floor.
worn
Oct 7 2014, 08:10 AM
QUOTE(maf914 @ Oct 7 2014, 04:02 AM)
There is an article in the October 2014 issue of Excellence magazine with a nice orange 1977 air cooled 911 set up for track days. It has a full rear under floor with diffuser. It looks good, but the article doesn't really go into detail about the performance of the diffuser or cooling issues with the engine.
I remember reading that the Porsche factory and Porsche customer teams had to make compromises with the 956/962 cars under floors and diffusers. Completely enclosed for max down force during qualifying or open louvers to allow airflow for engine cooling during the race. The air cooled engine configuration, as well as the flat six arrangement, was a liability. With water cooled engines the heat could be managed in other ways without compromising the diffuser and under floor.
Yeah, that was sort of my thinking, the air has to flow from top down in the engine and that is that. So I am guessing a good front air dam would be more effective overall. Except I keep hitting them on driveways and practically anything around me.
mgp4591
Oct 7 2014, 09:53 AM
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ Oct 7 2014, 01:18 AM)
If you want true down force at the rear, you need a wing. A spoiler decays lift and doesn't necessarily provide down force. It's been my experience that the 914 (at least mine) at speed needs more down force in the front. Diffusers I know absolutely nothing about.
I also had someone on this site claim that our cars get light in the rear over 100 mph. Mine hasn't been over 20 (until it's built) so I have no idea... any experience with this? How about ways to increase downforce in front without creating too much drag?
stownsen914
Oct 7 2014, 11:07 AM
I put a diffuser on the back of my 914 racecar. It required a large amount of work to fit, including custom headers and exhaust, redirecting exhausted cooling air from the cylinders/heads out the side of the car instead of out the bottom (which is now covered by flat bottom and the diffuser), redirecting the shift linkage, lowering the car to a silly low ride height to take advantage of underbody aero, etc., etc.
It was fun engineering it. I still need to put some data acquisition on the car to illustrate what if any benefit I'm actually getting out of all this.
Scott
Elliot Cannon
Oct 7 2014, 12:07 PM
QUOTE(mgp4591 @ Oct 7 2014, 08:53 AM)
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ Oct 7 2014, 01:18 AM)
If you want true down force at the rear, you need a wing. A spoiler decays lift and doesn't necessarily provide down force. It's been my experience that the 914 (at least mine) at speed needs more down force in the front. Diffusers I know absolutely nothing about.
I also had someone on this site claim that our cars get light in the rear over 100 mph. Mine hasn't been over 20 (until it's built) so I have no idea... any experience with this? How about ways to increase downforce in front without creating too much drag?
I have absolutely no experience as a race car driver so I have very little time above 100mph. I just remember the Yellow Zonker at 125 seemed to me to be very loose in the front. The looseness of the front end seemed to be inversely proportional to the tightness of my sphincter. I was gripping the seat cushion so tight it kind of made the five point harness redundant.
effutuo101
Oct 7 2014, 12:26 PM
I think Dana did one. If memory serves, a front air dam and rear spoiler are the way to go. For the rear, you are simply pushing the cortex further back so the rear doesn't lift. My wife maxed out my old 2.0 and had no issues with stability over the century mark.
effutuo101
Oct 7 2014, 12:27 PM
I think max speed is what, 130 in stock config?
mgp4591
Oct 7 2014, 12:44 PM
How about a rear underspoiler, kinda like the 944 Turbo? And a splitter for the front to keep that end stable...
whatabout1
Oct 7 2014, 12:49 PM
I remember a story of a Porsche team that tried reversing the cooling fan to create down force.
Must not have worked....
worn
Oct 7 2014, 01:11 PM
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ Oct 7 2014, 10:07 AM)
QUOTE(mgp4591 @ Oct 7 2014, 08:53 AM)
QUOTE(Elliot Cannon @ Oct 7 2014, 01:18 AM)
If you want true down force at the rear, you need a wing. A spoiler decays lift and doesn't necessarily provide down force. It's been my experience that the 914 (at least mine) at speed needs more down force in the front. Diffusers I know absolutely nothing about.
I also had someone on this site claim that our cars get light in the rear over 100 mph. Mine hasn't been over 20 (until it's built) so I have no idea... any experience with this? How about ways to increase downforce in front without creating too much drag?
I have absolutely no experience as a race car driver so I have very little time above 100mph. I just remember the Yellow Zonker at 125 seemed to me to be very loose in the front. The looseness of the front end seemed to be inversely proportional to the tightness of my sphincter. I was gripping the seat cushion so tight it kind of made the five point harness redundant.
Well that is the kind of detailed technical data I was...well, ...Thanks Elliot!
worn
Oct 7 2014, 01:13 PM
QUOTE(mgp4591 @ Oct 7 2014, 10:44 AM)
How about a rear underspoiler, kinda like the 944 Turbo? And a splitter for the front to keep that end stable...
That was the example that had me started. Thanks.
worn
Oct 7 2014, 01:14 PM
QUOTE(whatabout1 @ Oct 7 2014, 10:49 AM)
I remember a story of a Porsche team that tried reversing the cooling fan to create down force.
Must not have worked....
Hmmm. At some point on this board there was talk of 917 fans shooting into the sky due to hub failure. So I am thinking those at least were (when working) thrusting air down.
A incredibly effective method,channeling the air to the low pressure area.
damesandhotrods
Oct 7 2014, 01:41 PM
If you want downforce I’d say buy a wing and either book some wind tunnel time or buy some data acquisition equipment. Because there will be some tuning involved. Considering all of the science involved in making ground effects actually work I have a feeling any diffuser and skirts you add will only be cosmetic.
Or build a replica to get that downforce feeling. The idea of a car with low drag and sufficient downforce at public road speed is good one. Gravity will provide the downforce and a teardrop shape will reduce drag. Study aerodynamics.
I read that page many times. What I do not get though is why the big axx spoiler produces less downforce than stock. Willing to believe but surprised.
It is very simple. The wing is in dirty airflow, and the angle of attack is probably less than optimal. A wing needs to be set up and tuned. And you can’t just stick it anywhere. Learn from teenage tuner crowd…
mgp4591
Oct 7 2014, 09:00 PM
My understanding of a diffuser is to reduce drag by increasing the percentage of laminar airflow from under the rear of the car, effectively (after tuning and research) helping the air pull the rear end down by keeping the air attached to the surface. You also see alot of cars that have upward facing vents behind the rear wheels to help that turbulent air exit out and up, hopefully pushing the rear end down. At what speed all this work is effective I have no idea so I'd guess you'd have to look at successful example (supercar or racer) and find out from that source what works. Of course the rest of their design has to be taken into consideration also but I'd think that some copying wouldn't hurt... Any and all comments are welcome as I well may be up in the night on this.
mgp4591
Oct 7 2014, 09:13 PM
Or we can google images and results of wind tunnel testing on a brick with vortex generators installed...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.