QUOTE(porschetub @ Oct 22 2017, 09:13 PM)
You are kidding....right,like walking a horse to water after it has died from lack of.
The sample will be so confusing with so many contaminates like copper ,tin and most likely ferrous metals.
Total waste of money,by the way in my last job I oil sampled oil every 3000hrs on a large marine engine .
The assumption put forth by the cars owner is that "worn out" oil caused the engine failure.
You have listed metals that are generally associated with engine wear.
In order to prove or disprove "worn out" oil caused the failure, I'd be looking at properties related to oil quality not engine wear. Elements like Potassium, Boron, Sodium, Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Zinc and Barium are engine oil additives.
Also important are viscosity, fuel contimanation, antifreeze, water, insolubles ( formed by oxidation of oil )
If all of the above is within acceptable limits, "worn out" oil didn't cause the failure. If the root cause of the failure isn't addressed, the motor will come apart again. Even worse, if the root cause of failure is unknowingly eliminated by accident or by using a different set of parts, the owner will happily go on changing oil thinking the problem was solved when it hasn't.