QUOTE(JamesM @ Dec 9 2021, 01:01 AM)
QUOTE(wonkipop @ Dec 8 2021, 11:34 PM)
its fascinating the way they kept moving that can closer and closer to the fan bleed port?
what was happening there. first the frunk.
i dug up some stuff recently that makes me think the EPA was taking a real close look at VW in mid 73. they got charged with the first emission cheat. it got hushed up at the time and settled real quick behind the scenes. but one particular VW model for 74 got delayed. can't find out which one. but i've got a fair idea. there is a fair chance the EPA started taking a real close look at VW model range for 74. all aspects thereof?
there is always a reason they suddenly change something they have been doing for 3-4 years and then start fidgeting with it.
My guess is it also may have been related to the production cost cutting that started occurring with the 74 cars as well. Moving the charcoal canister back to the engine bay reduced the materials used (and complexity) to run the 2 larger vacuum lines from the engine bay to the frunk along the driver side long. Coincidently (or possibly not) the changeover seems to align pretty close to when they transitioned from the glass faced gauges to the cheaper plastic face gauges.
yes, its more economical for sure.
but there is one more thing to it.
they alter the plumbing.
there is a whole thread over in originality section about this.
i had to take on mr. bowlsby.
i'm pretty sure i might/could be right. but i'm not being opinionated. because you could always be wrong.
i just dug up some stuff.
they messed with the can for a number of reasons?
including basically realising that the VW set up with the can closer to the engine was cheaper and it worked. whereas earlier 914s follow the 911 layout. which was expensive and didn't work?
for some reason both 911s and 914s had the can moved to the rear of the car in 73 for the 74 model year. but VW altered nothing on the rest of their range.
and the EPA had one particular 74 VW model under the microscope.
the can and what VW were "caught" out about were two separate things?, but i think once you get caught the "cops" start going through you. out come the drug dogs to sniff your car etc. you know the scenario. "get out of the car - stand over there". its a right, lets have a good look at this thing?
i know this much it involved thermo switches for cold starts. VW declared these switches in 73 for 74 models. the EPA ruled them a cheat. VW admitted to their use on 73 models. i think it was for type 3s with injection. EPA ruled unacceptable for 74.
.....but they weren't making type 3s for 74. they only had 412s and 914s running L jet.
so i think L jet got pinged early on in approval process. its a guess. or they might have picked up on 74MY 2.0s with Djet as per type 3s. except we know they were knocking out 2.0 L from the start of MY74. they didn't seem to have a hiccup/
the clue is that L jet gets delayed. its a late start. nov 73.
maybe technical difficulties with L jet made it late for other reasons?
i dunno know. but i think if someone had the time and the access to VW museum archives they could probably find out. all you can really find is a trace of it in other things like the EPA or CARB.