NVH treatments have come a long way. The industry still uses bake on mastic patches and/or Liquid Applied Sound Deadner (LASD) via robotics.
Constrained layer damping like Dynamat will be the most effective at reducing noise. Especially for the low frequency structural noise that will originate from the vibration of the 914 floor pan.
The downside for OEM's is that constrained layer damping is heavier (negative for fuel economy) and more expensive than spot applied LASD. Constrained layer usage is strategic. Usually used were LASD isn't enough, or cannot be applied easily by robotics.
Other Liquid Applied Sound Barrier (LASB) products are typically only effective for high frequency airborne noise sources. Products like Lizzard Skin, or bed liner sprays will help, but won't be as effective as constrained layer products. LASB's are lighter than constrained layer products and will offer some noise reduction for higher frequency airborne noise that would tend to reflect off a bare metal surface. LASB's won't do anything for low frequency structural borne noise.
Everything in life is a trade-off. Only you can decide but there are better options than the OEM tar/mastic which was prone to holding moisture under it.
Short background on NVH:
https://insights.basf.com/home/article/read...nd-lasb-systems