QUOTE(ddire333 @ Apr 5 2022, 07:38 AM)
QUOTE(Jim C @ Apr 5 2022, 12:34 PM)
I have reinstalled the carbon canister in the engine compartment of my '76, however, I can't figure out where the connection to the cooling fan housing gets made. I have found what appears to be a port of some kind in front of the fan housing just right of center, but it is too stubby for a hose to stay on. So, where does the canister get its airflow from? Is there a fan housing fitting I'm missing or not seeing?
That stumped me as well as all the drawings show connection to the fan housing, but my housing had no where to connect (1974 2lt). I looked for days. Then I notice a connection in the engine tin po had blanked off (near the alternator adjustment cut out) I connected to that and assume that is correct location as no other option.
that might mean you have a 74 with the canister in the front on the fuel tank.
thats the port used i believe on left of engine fan shroud.
port on right of engine bay near ECU (at least for 1.8s) is for the engine bay canister which happened nov 1973.
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...57407&st=20there is some overlap with 1.8s and i think all have the port on the right side.
for the few weeks or maybe first month of production of 1.8s in 1973 they had a front can and the hose was run across the front of fan to go up left side of car.
when it comes to 2 L i am less sure what they did with the engine bay can layout.
@JeffBowlsby would know
but there are two batches of 74 2.0L a bunch that get built from aug 73 to late oct 73.
front cans.
then all they build are 1.8s from nov 73 to around about end of jan/start of feb 74.
then second batch of 74 2.0s get done and production becomes mixed with output of 1.8s and 2.0s. so they might have changed the port on the fan for 2.0s or they might not have. needs someone who knows 2.0s to comment.
there has been some debate re can plumbing for engine bay layout.
i believe there are some hose diagrams circulating which are incorrect.
at least when it comes to 1.8s.
they definitely did change which hose went where with the engine bay can in those.
revised the layout to become the VW method.
but again i can't comment on 2.0L cars. i only know the 1.8.
if the port is plugged with a separate second plug you know its an owner has removed the hose and can.
if the port or nipple is there but its still go solid material in it then its factory original and did not use that nipple or port. these engines were somewhat universal castings both for 914s and other VWs. certain holes in the cast nipples were drilled for certain applications.